Verification in Results-Based Financing for Health : Summary of Findings and Recommendations from a Cross-Case Analysis
Despite the increasing popularity of Results Based Financing, there is little evidence or documentation of different verification strategies and how strategies relate to the verification results. Documentation of implementation processes including...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Working Paper |
Language: | English en_US |
Published: |
World Bank, Washington, DC
2017
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/504661485897909610/Verification-in-results-based-financing-for-health http://hdl.handle.net/10986/26040 |
id |
okr-10986-26040 |
---|---|
recordtype |
oai_dc |
spelling |
okr-10986-260402021-05-25T08:57:13Z Verification in Results-Based Financing for Health : Summary of Findings and Recommendations from a Cross-Case Analysis Vergeer, Petronella Heard, Anna Josephson, Erik Fleisher, Lisa verification results-based financing performance-based financing health systems reform Despite the increasing popularity of Results Based Financing, there is little evidence or documentation of different verification strategies and how strategies relate to the verification results. Documentation of implementation processes including those pertaining to verification of outputs/results is lacking in World Bank-financed RBF projects in the health sector. The overall objective of this cross-case analysis is to expand knowledge about verification processes andpractices to address the design and implementation needs of RBF projects. This study adds toavailable knowledge by comparing the characteristics of verification strategies as well as available data on costs (using level of effort as a proxy), savings, and verification results to date in six countries: Afghanistan, Argentina, Burundi, Panama, Rwanda, and the UK. These case studies were purposively selected to explore a number of factors, including: how a variety of results are verified; how the verification strategy is being implemented at different levels in the health system; and the implications of having different types of actors (that is, third-party versus internal verifiers) involved in the verification process. In this cross-case analysis, the discussion of similarities and differences in verification methods across the six cases as well as the analysis of findings is guided by a conceptual framework developed for this study. This study presents seventeen key findings, and nine recommendations. 2017-02-13T20:15:52Z 2017-02-13T20:15:52Z 2016-12 Working Paper http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/504661485897909610/Verification-in-results-based-financing-for-health http://hdl.handle.net/10986/26040 English en_US Health, Nutrition and Population Discussion Paper; CC BY 3.0 IGO http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo World Bank World Bank, Washington, DC Publications & Research Publications & Research :: Working Paper |
repository_type |
Digital Repository |
institution_category |
Foreign Institution |
institution |
Digital Repositories |
building |
World Bank Open Knowledge Repository |
collection |
World Bank |
language |
English en_US |
topic |
verification results-based financing performance-based financing health systems reform |
spellingShingle |
verification results-based financing performance-based financing health systems reform Vergeer, Petronella Heard, Anna Josephson, Erik Fleisher, Lisa Verification in Results-Based Financing for Health : Summary of Findings and Recommendations from a Cross-Case Analysis |
relation |
Health, Nutrition and Population Discussion Paper; |
description |
Despite the increasing popularity of
Results Based Financing, there is little evidence or
documentation of different verification strategies and how
strategies relate to the verification results. Documentation
of implementation processes including those pertaining to
verification of outputs/results is lacking in World
Bank-financed RBF projects in the health sector. The overall
objective of this cross-case analysis is to expand knowledge
about verification processes andpractices to address the
design and implementation needs of RBF projects. This study
adds toavailable knowledge by comparing the characteristics
of verification strategies as well as available data on
costs (using level of effort as a proxy), savings, and
verification results to date in six countries: Afghanistan,
Argentina, Burundi, Panama, Rwanda, and the UK. These case
studies were purposively selected to explore a number of
factors, including: how a variety of results are verified;
how the verification strategy is being implemented at
different levels in the health system; and the implications
of having different types of actors (that is, third-party
versus internal verifiers) involved in the verification
process. In this cross-case analysis, the discussion of
similarities and differences in verification methods across
the six cases as well as the analysis of findings is guided
by a conceptual framework developed for this study. This
study presents seventeen key findings, and nine recommendations. |
format |
Working Paper |
author |
Vergeer, Petronella Heard, Anna Josephson, Erik Fleisher, Lisa |
author_facet |
Vergeer, Petronella Heard, Anna Josephson, Erik Fleisher, Lisa |
author_sort |
Vergeer, Petronella |
title |
Verification in Results-Based Financing for Health : Summary of Findings and Recommendations from a Cross-Case Analysis |
title_short |
Verification in Results-Based Financing for Health : Summary of Findings and Recommendations from a Cross-Case Analysis |
title_full |
Verification in Results-Based Financing for Health : Summary of Findings and Recommendations from a Cross-Case Analysis |
title_fullStr |
Verification in Results-Based Financing for Health : Summary of Findings and Recommendations from a Cross-Case Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed |
Verification in Results-Based Financing for Health : Summary of Findings and Recommendations from a Cross-Case Analysis |
title_sort |
verification in results-based financing for health : summary of findings and recommendations from a cross-case analysis |
publisher |
World Bank, Washington, DC |
publishDate |
2017 |
url |
http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/504661485897909610/Verification-in-results-based-financing-for-health http://hdl.handle.net/10986/26040 |
_version_ |
1764460791884414976 |