Marrakech Action Plan for Statistics, Partnership in Statistics for Development in the 21st Century, and Trust Fund for Statistical Capacity Building
This is the Global Program Review (GPR) of three related global partnership programs that aim to develop statistical capacity in developing countries the Marrakech Action Plan for Statistics (MAPS), the Partnership in Statistics for Development in...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Book |
| Language: | English en_US |
| Published: |
World Bank, Washington, DC
2017
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/384281468162542587/Marrakech-action-plan-for-statistics-partnership-in-statistics-for-development-in-the-21st-century-trust-fund-for-statistical-capacity-building http://hdl.handle.net/10986/27349 |
| Summary: | This is the Global Program Review (GPR)
of three related global partnership programs that aim to
develop statistical capacity in developing countries the
Marrakech Action Plan for Statistics (MAPS), the Partnership
in Statistics for Development in the 21st Century (PARIS21),
and the Trust Fund for Statistical Capacity Building
(TFSCB). The three programs have been reviewed together in a
single GPR because they have similar objectives, because the
World Bank has been heavily involved in all three programs,
and because of the potential to learn cross-cutting lessons
of experience in relation to statistical capacity building
(SCB). This GPR has also reviewed relevant internal
materials (progress reports, results frameworks, minutes of
governing body meetings, etc.) and other information
available on the web. In addition, IEG has independently
obtained opinions and views on the three programs by
interviewing staff of the Bank and the PARIS21 Secretariat,
and selected members of the PARIS21 Board at the 2010 Board
meeting in Paris, France. This Independent Evaluation Group
(IEG) review has identified a number of weaknesses in the
external evaluations. First, while all three external
evaluations clearly state that the assessment of program
effectiveness was in their terms of reference, the focus was
predominantly on processes and activities, with insufficient
emphasis given to outputs and outcomes. While this may be
justified by technical and conceptual challenges, the
evaluations could have identified concrete ways in which the
programs have contributed to the improvement in statistics
and statistical capacity. Second, while all three
evaluations share the common concern on the inadequate
implementation of National Strategy for the Development of
Statistics (NSDSs), they did not provide useful insights on
how or to what extent NSDSs have helped with the development
of national visions for statistical development. Third,
there could have been a sharper focus and more specific
recommendations on the notable lack of progress in the use
of statistics in sub-Saharan Africa. Lastly, it would have
been useful to have more systematic cross-references to the
results of the analyses in the three evaluations. |
|---|