Country Partnership Framework for Mauritius for the Period of FY17-FY21
The Country Partnership Framework (CPF) for Mauritius covers FY17-21. The previous Country Partnership Strategy (CPS) was originally intended to cover FY07-13 but was extended through FY15 at the time of the CPS Progress Report. The CPF is informed...
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Report |
| Language: | English en_US |
| Published: |
World Bank, Washington, DC
2017
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/648161499047236511/Mauritius-Country-partnership-framework-for-the-period-of-FY17-FY21 http://hdl.handle.net/10986/27566 |
| Summary: | The Country Partnership Framework (CPF)
for Mauritius covers FY17-21. The previous Country
Partnership Strategy (CPS) was originally intended to cover
FY07-13 but was extended through FY15 at the time of the CPS
Progress Report. The CPF is informed by the Systematic
Country Diagnostic (SCD) that was circulated to the Board in
July 2015. Elections in December 2014 led to the formation
of a new Government and this CPF is aligned strategically
with the Government Programme 2015-2019, Achieving
Meaningful Change, that was presented to Parliament on
January 27, 2015. The CPF seeks to maximize over a five-year
period the comparative advantages of the World Bank Group
(WBG), through packages of innovative public and private
financing options based on cutting edge global knowledge and
experience. The CPS provided strategic support around the
Government of Mauritius’ (GoM) four pillars of reform : (i)
fiscal consolidation and improving public sector efficiency;
(ii) improving trade competitiveness; (iii) improving the
business climate; and (iv) democratizing the economy through
participation, inclusion and sustainability. The report
evaluates the achievements of CPS program outcomes as laid
out in the results matrix; assesses the WBG’s performance in
designing and implementing the CPS program, and draws
lessons for the preparation of the forthcoming Country
Partnership Framework (CPF). The CPS pillars were relevant
and well aligned in addressing Government priorities and
country needs. Flexibility in the design of the strategy
facilitated rapid response to changing needs and the Bank
was able to respond promptly and effectively to unexpected
events such as the triple trade shocks, global financial
crisis and political transition. |
|---|