Serbia - Right-Sizing the Government Wage Bill
Serbia's public sector wage bill constitutes a significant share of total government expenditure. At present, it is significantly higher than in most neighboring European Union (EU) member countries. This is largely due to higher average level...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Public Expenditure Review |
Language: | English |
Published: |
World Bank
2012
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www-wds.worldbank.org/external/default/main?menuPK=64187510&pagePK=64193027&piPK=64187937&theSitePK=523679&menuPK=64187510&searchMenuPK=64187283&siteName=WDS&entityID=000334955_20101104023105 http://hdl.handle.net/10986/2923 |
Summary: | Serbia's public sector wage bill
constitutes a significant share of total government
expenditure. At present, it is significantly higher than in
most neighboring European Union (EU) member countries. This
is largely due to higher average levels of compensation,
rather than higher levels of staffing. While wage spending
has fallen recently this is not the occasion to be sanguine
about the Government's wage and employment policies.
There are two reasons. First, continuing control over the
wage bill is a key part of the Government's overall
deficit reduction strategy. Given the Government's
reluctance to raise taxes and the difficulty it confronts in
reducing other major categories of expenditures
(particularly pensions), restraining the wage bill is
critical to fiscal sustainability. In connection with its
standby arrangement with the International Monetary Fund
(IMF), the government is committed to enacting fiscal
responsibility legislation which would cap wage bill
spending at eight percent of gross domestic product (GDP)
over the medium term. To date, the Government has been
relying on blunt instruments to achieve this target; most
importantly a freeze on nominal wages and a partial freeze
on the creation of new positions, both introduced in 2009.
As the current recession eases, pressures to increase wages
are mounting. The wage freeze is becoming politically
unsustainable. More nuanced methods of restraining the wage
bill are required. Second, over the longer term, the present
policy of continuous wage and position freezes would
undermine the quality of public administration. Persistent
wage freezes would make it difficult to attract and retain
competent staff. Persistent position freezes would lock in
existing patterns of over- and under staffing. On the other
hand, a reversion to the former system of ad hoc adjustments
in staffing and wages could set the stage for unsustainable
wage bill growth in the future. Structural reforms are
therefore required. |
---|