Serbia - Right-Sizing the Government Wage Bill
Serbia's public sector wage bill constitutes a significant share of total government expenditure. At present, it is significantly higher than in most neighboring European Union (EU) member countries. This is largely due to higher average level...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Public Expenditure Review |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
World Bank
2012
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://www-wds.worldbank.org/external/default/main?menuPK=64187510&pagePK=64193027&piPK=64187937&theSitePK=523679&menuPK=64187510&searchMenuPK=64187283&siteName=WDS&entityID=000334955_20101104023105 http://hdl.handle.net/10986/2923 |
| id |
okr-10986-2923 |
|---|---|
| recordtype |
oai_dc |
| repository_type |
Digital Repository |
| institution_category |
Foreign Institution |
| institution |
Digital Repositories |
| building |
World Bank Open Knowledge Repository |
| collection |
World Bank |
| language |
English |
| topic |
ACCOUNTABILITY ACCOUNTING ADVERSE SELECTION ATTRITION AVERAGE WAGE AVERAGE WAGES BUDGET EXECUTION BUDGET PROCESS CIVIL SERVANT CIVIL SERVANTS CLERKS COLLECTIVE BARGAINING COMPETITIVE PRESSURES CRIME DISMISSAL EARNING ECONOMIC CONDITIONS EMPLOYEE EMPLOYER CONTRIBUTIONS EMPLOYMENT POLICIES EMPLOYMENT SERVICES EQUAL PAY EQUALIZATION FEDERAL GOVERNMENT FINANCIAL INCENTIVES FISCAL RESPONSIBILITY GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS GOVERNMENT SPENDING GROSS WAGES HEALTH INSURANCE HOUSING HUMAN RESOURCE HUMAN RESOURCES INCOME INCOME TAXES INFLATION INFORMAL SECTOR INSURANCE JOB SECURITY JOBS JUDICIARY LABOR FORCE LABOR LAW LABOR MARKET LABOR RELATIONS LAWS LAWYERS LOCAL BUDGETS LOCAL FINANCE LOCAL GOVERNMENT LOCAL GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES LOCAL GOVERNMENTS LOCAL LEVEL MINIMUM WAGE MINISTER MINISTRIES OF FINANCE MUNICIPAL COUNCILS MUNICIPAL GOVERNMENTS MUNICIPALITIES MUNICIPALITY NOMINAL WAGES OCCUPATION OCCUPATIONS OUTPUTS PAYROLL TAX POLICE POLITICIANS POVERTY REDUCTION PRIMARY LEVEL PRIMARY SCHOOL PRIVATE EMPLOYMENT PRIVATE FIRMS PRIVATE SECTOR PRIVATE SECTOR WAGES PRIVATE SECTORS PRIVATIZATION PRODUCTIVITY PROVISIONS PUBLIC PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION PUBLIC EDUCATION PUBLIC EMPLOYEES PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT PUBLIC ENTERPRISES PUBLIC EXPENDITURE PUBLIC EXPENDITURE REVIEW PUBLIC SECTOR PUBLIC SECTOR COMPENSATION PUBLIC SECTOR DOWNSIZING PUBLIC SECTOR EMPLOYMENT PUBLIC SECTOR HUMAN RESOURCE PUBLIC SECTOR HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PUBLIC SECTOR INSTITUTIONS PUBLIC SECTOR STAFF PUBLIC SECTOR UNIONS PUBLIC SECTOR WAGE PUBLIC SECTOR WAGE BILL PUBLIC SECTOR WAGES PUBLIC SECTOR WORKER PUBLIC SECTOR WORKERS PUBLIC SERVICE PUBLIC SERVICE EMPLOYEES PUBLIC SERVICES PUBLIC SPENDING REAL WAGE REAL WAGES RETIREMENT SAVINGS SELF EMPLOYMENT SERVANTS SERVICE SECTOR SEVERANCE PAYMENT SEVERANCE PAYMENTS STRUCTURAL REFORMS TAX TEMPORARY WORKERS TOTAL EMPLOYMENT TOTAL WAGE TRADE UNIONS TRANSPARENCY TREASURY UNEMPLOYED URBAN AREAS VOTERS WAGE ADJUSTMENT WAGE BILL WAGE DATA WAGE DETERMINATION WAGE INCREASES WAGE LEVELS WAGE NEGOTIATION WAGE PREMIUM WAGE STRUCTURE WORK FORCE WORKERS |
| spellingShingle |
ACCOUNTABILITY ACCOUNTING ADVERSE SELECTION ATTRITION AVERAGE WAGE AVERAGE WAGES BUDGET EXECUTION BUDGET PROCESS CIVIL SERVANT CIVIL SERVANTS CLERKS COLLECTIVE BARGAINING COMPETITIVE PRESSURES CRIME DISMISSAL EARNING ECONOMIC CONDITIONS EMPLOYEE EMPLOYER CONTRIBUTIONS EMPLOYMENT POLICIES EMPLOYMENT SERVICES EQUAL PAY EQUALIZATION FEDERAL GOVERNMENT FINANCIAL INCENTIVES FISCAL RESPONSIBILITY GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS GOVERNMENT SPENDING GROSS WAGES HEALTH INSURANCE HOUSING HUMAN RESOURCE HUMAN RESOURCES INCOME INCOME TAXES INFLATION INFORMAL SECTOR INSURANCE JOB SECURITY JOBS JUDICIARY LABOR FORCE LABOR LAW LABOR MARKET LABOR RELATIONS LAWS LAWYERS LOCAL BUDGETS LOCAL FINANCE LOCAL GOVERNMENT LOCAL GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES LOCAL GOVERNMENTS LOCAL LEVEL MINIMUM WAGE MINISTER MINISTRIES OF FINANCE MUNICIPAL COUNCILS MUNICIPAL GOVERNMENTS MUNICIPALITIES MUNICIPALITY NOMINAL WAGES OCCUPATION OCCUPATIONS OUTPUTS PAYROLL TAX POLICE POLITICIANS POVERTY REDUCTION PRIMARY LEVEL PRIMARY SCHOOL PRIVATE EMPLOYMENT PRIVATE FIRMS PRIVATE SECTOR PRIVATE SECTOR WAGES PRIVATE SECTORS PRIVATIZATION PRODUCTIVITY PROVISIONS PUBLIC PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION PUBLIC EDUCATION PUBLIC EMPLOYEES PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT PUBLIC ENTERPRISES PUBLIC EXPENDITURE PUBLIC EXPENDITURE REVIEW PUBLIC SECTOR PUBLIC SECTOR COMPENSATION PUBLIC SECTOR DOWNSIZING PUBLIC SECTOR EMPLOYMENT PUBLIC SECTOR HUMAN RESOURCE PUBLIC SECTOR HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PUBLIC SECTOR INSTITUTIONS PUBLIC SECTOR STAFF PUBLIC SECTOR UNIONS PUBLIC SECTOR WAGE PUBLIC SECTOR WAGE BILL PUBLIC SECTOR WAGES PUBLIC SECTOR WORKER PUBLIC SECTOR WORKERS PUBLIC SERVICE PUBLIC SERVICE EMPLOYEES PUBLIC SERVICES PUBLIC SPENDING REAL WAGE REAL WAGES RETIREMENT SAVINGS SELF EMPLOYMENT SERVANTS SERVICE SECTOR SEVERANCE PAYMENT SEVERANCE PAYMENTS STRUCTURAL REFORMS TAX TEMPORARY WORKERS TOTAL EMPLOYMENT TOTAL WAGE TRADE UNIONS TRANSPARENCY TREASURY UNEMPLOYED URBAN AREAS VOTERS WAGE ADJUSTMENT WAGE BILL WAGE DATA WAGE DETERMINATION WAGE INCREASES WAGE LEVELS WAGE NEGOTIATION WAGE PREMIUM WAGE STRUCTURE WORK FORCE WORKERS World Bank Serbia - Right-Sizing the Government Wage Bill |
| geographic_facet |
Europe and Central Asia Europe Serbia |
| description |
Serbia's public sector wage bill
constitutes a significant share of total government
expenditure. At present, it is significantly higher than in
most neighboring European Union (EU) member countries. This
is largely due to higher average levels of compensation,
rather than higher levels of staffing. While wage spending
has fallen recently this is not the occasion to be sanguine
about the Government's wage and employment policies.
There are two reasons. First, continuing control over the
wage bill is a key part of the Government's overall
deficit reduction strategy. Given the Government's
reluctance to raise taxes and the difficulty it confronts in
reducing other major categories of expenditures
(particularly pensions), restraining the wage bill is
critical to fiscal sustainability. In connection with its
standby arrangement with the International Monetary Fund
(IMF), the government is committed to enacting fiscal
responsibility legislation which would cap wage bill
spending at eight percent of gross domestic product (GDP)
over the medium term. To date, the Government has been
relying on blunt instruments to achieve this target; most
importantly a freeze on nominal wages and a partial freeze
on the creation of new positions, both introduced in 2009.
As the current recession eases, pressures to increase wages
are mounting. The wage freeze is becoming politically
unsustainable. More nuanced methods of restraining the wage
bill are required. Second, over the longer term, the present
policy of continuous wage and position freezes would
undermine the quality of public administration. Persistent
wage freezes would make it difficult to attract and retain
competent staff. Persistent position freezes would lock in
existing patterns of over- and under staffing. On the other
hand, a reversion to the former system of ad hoc adjustments
in staffing and wages could set the stage for unsustainable
wage bill growth in the future. Structural reforms are
therefore required. |
| format |
Economic & Sector Work :: Public Expenditure Review |
| author |
World Bank |
| author_facet |
World Bank |
| author_sort |
World Bank |
| title |
Serbia - Right-Sizing the Government Wage Bill |
| title_short |
Serbia - Right-Sizing the Government Wage Bill |
| title_full |
Serbia - Right-Sizing the Government Wage Bill |
| title_fullStr |
Serbia - Right-Sizing the Government Wage Bill |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Serbia - Right-Sizing the Government Wage Bill |
| title_sort |
serbia - right-sizing the government wage bill |
| publisher |
World Bank |
| publishDate |
2012 |
| url |
http://www-wds.worldbank.org/external/default/main?menuPK=64187510&pagePK=64193027&piPK=64187937&theSitePK=523679&menuPK=64187510&searchMenuPK=64187283&siteName=WDS&entityID=000334955_20101104023105 http://hdl.handle.net/10986/2923 |
| _version_ |
1764386165450866688 |
| spelling |
okr-10986-29232021-04-23T14:02:05Z Serbia - Right-Sizing the Government Wage Bill World Bank ACCOUNTABILITY ACCOUNTING ADVERSE SELECTION ATTRITION AVERAGE WAGE AVERAGE WAGES BUDGET EXECUTION BUDGET PROCESS CIVIL SERVANT CIVIL SERVANTS CLERKS COLLECTIVE BARGAINING COMPETITIVE PRESSURES CRIME DISMISSAL EARNING ECONOMIC CONDITIONS EMPLOYEE EMPLOYER CONTRIBUTIONS EMPLOYMENT POLICIES EMPLOYMENT SERVICES EQUAL PAY EQUALIZATION FEDERAL GOVERNMENT FINANCIAL INCENTIVES FISCAL RESPONSIBILITY GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS GOVERNMENT SPENDING GROSS WAGES HEALTH INSURANCE HOUSING HUMAN RESOURCE HUMAN RESOURCES INCOME INCOME TAXES INFLATION INFORMAL SECTOR INSURANCE JOB SECURITY JOBS JUDICIARY LABOR FORCE LABOR LAW LABOR MARKET LABOR RELATIONS LAWS LAWYERS LOCAL BUDGETS LOCAL FINANCE LOCAL GOVERNMENT LOCAL GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES LOCAL GOVERNMENTS LOCAL LEVEL MINIMUM WAGE MINISTER MINISTRIES OF FINANCE MUNICIPAL COUNCILS MUNICIPAL GOVERNMENTS MUNICIPALITIES MUNICIPALITY NOMINAL WAGES OCCUPATION OCCUPATIONS OUTPUTS PAYROLL TAX POLICE POLITICIANS POVERTY REDUCTION PRIMARY LEVEL PRIMARY SCHOOL PRIVATE EMPLOYMENT PRIVATE FIRMS PRIVATE SECTOR PRIVATE SECTOR WAGES PRIVATE SECTORS PRIVATIZATION PRODUCTIVITY PROVISIONS PUBLIC PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION PUBLIC EDUCATION PUBLIC EMPLOYEES PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT PUBLIC ENTERPRISES PUBLIC EXPENDITURE PUBLIC EXPENDITURE REVIEW PUBLIC SECTOR PUBLIC SECTOR COMPENSATION PUBLIC SECTOR DOWNSIZING PUBLIC SECTOR EMPLOYMENT PUBLIC SECTOR HUMAN RESOURCE PUBLIC SECTOR HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PUBLIC SECTOR INSTITUTIONS PUBLIC SECTOR STAFF PUBLIC SECTOR UNIONS PUBLIC SECTOR WAGE PUBLIC SECTOR WAGE BILL PUBLIC SECTOR WAGES PUBLIC SECTOR WORKER PUBLIC SECTOR WORKERS PUBLIC SERVICE PUBLIC SERVICE EMPLOYEES PUBLIC SERVICES PUBLIC SPENDING REAL WAGE REAL WAGES RETIREMENT SAVINGS SELF EMPLOYMENT SERVANTS SERVICE SECTOR SEVERANCE PAYMENT SEVERANCE PAYMENTS STRUCTURAL REFORMS TAX TEMPORARY WORKERS TOTAL EMPLOYMENT TOTAL WAGE TRADE UNIONS TRANSPARENCY TREASURY UNEMPLOYED URBAN AREAS VOTERS WAGE ADJUSTMENT WAGE BILL WAGE DATA WAGE DETERMINATION WAGE INCREASES WAGE LEVELS WAGE NEGOTIATION WAGE PREMIUM WAGE STRUCTURE WORK FORCE WORKERS Serbia's public sector wage bill constitutes a significant share of total government expenditure. At present, it is significantly higher than in most neighboring European Union (EU) member countries. This is largely due to higher average levels of compensation, rather than higher levels of staffing. While wage spending has fallen recently this is not the occasion to be sanguine about the Government's wage and employment policies. There are two reasons. First, continuing control over the wage bill is a key part of the Government's overall deficit reduction strategy. Given the Government's reluctance to raise taxes and the difficulty it confronts in reducing other major categories of expenditures (particularly pensions), restraining the wage bill is critical to fiscal sustainability. In connection with its standby arrangement with the International Monetary Fund (IMF), the government is committed to enacting fiscal responsibility legislation which would cap wage bill spending at eight percent of gross domestic product (GDP) over the medium term. To date, the Government has been relying on blunt instruments to achieve this target; most importantly a freeze on nominal wages and a partial freeze on the creation of new positions, both introduced in 2009. As the current recession eases, pressures to increase wages are mounting. The wage freeze is becoming politically unsustainable. More nuanced methods of restraining the wage bill are required. Second, over the longer term, the present policy of continuous wage and position freezes would undermine the quality of public administration. Persistent wage freezes would make it difficult to attract and retain competent staff. Persistent position freezes would lock in existing patterns of over- and under staffing. On the other hand, a reversion to the former system of ad hoc adjustments in staffing and wages could set the stage for unsustainable wage bill growth in the future. Structural reforms are therefore required. 2012-03-19T10:24:52Z 2012-03-19T10:24:52Z 2010-10-12 http://www-wds.worldbank.org/external/default/main?menuPK=64187510&pagePK=64193027&piPK=64187937&theSitePK=523679&menuPK=64187510&searchMenuPK=64187283&siteName=WDS&entityID=000334955_20101104023105 http://hdl.handle.net/10986/2923 English CC BY 3.0 IGO http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo/ World Bank World Bank Economic & Sector Work :: Public Expenditure Review Europe and Central Asia Europe Serbia |