Direct Democracy and Resource Allocation : Experimental Evidence from Afghanistan
Direct democracy is designed to better align policy outcomes with citizen preferences. To test this proposition, we randomized whether 250 villages across Afghanistan selected projects by secret-ballot referenda or by consultation meetings. We find that referenda reduce the influence of local elites...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Journal Article |
Published: |
Elsevier
2018
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/10986/29340 |
id |
okr-10986-29340 |
---|---|
recordtype |
oai_dc |
spelling |
okr-10986-293402021-05-25T10:54:44Z Direct Democracy and Resource Allocation : Experimental Evidence from Afghanistan Beath, Andrew Christia, Fotini Enikolopov, Ruben POLITICAL INSTITUTIONS ELECTORAL SYSTEM DIRECT DEMOCRACY FIELD EXPERIMENT CITIZEN ENGAGEMENT STAKEHOLDER INTERESTS Direct democracy is designed to better align policy outcomes with citizen preferences. To test this proposition, we randomized whether 250 villages across Afghanistan selected projects by secret-ballot referenda or by consultation meetings. We find that referenda reduce the influence of local elites over both project type and location. Consistent with previous experimental results, we also find that referenda improve villagers' perceptions of the local economy and of the quality of local governance. However, we find no systematic evidence that selecting projects via referenda increases the average impact of such projects. 2018-02-08T17:29:13Z 2018-02-08T17:29:13Z 2017-01 Journal Article Journal of Development Economics 0304-3878 http://hdl.handle.net/10986/29340 CC BY-NC-ND 3.0 IGO http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/igo World Bank Elsevier Publications & Research :: Journal Article Publications & Research South Asia Afghanistan |
repository_type |
Digital Repository |
institution_category |
Foreign Institution |
institution |
Digital Repositories |
building |
World Bank Open Knowledge Repository |
collection |
World Bank |
topic |
POLITICAL INSTITUTIONS ELECTORAL SYSTEM DIRECT DEMOCRACY FIELD EXPERIMENT CITIZEN ENGAGEMENT STAKEHOLDER INTERESTS |
spellingShingle |
POLITICAL INSTITUTIONS ELECTORAL SYSTEM DIRECT DEMOCRACY FIELD EXPERIMENT CITIZEN ENGAGEMENT STAKEHOLDER INTERESTS Beath, Andrew Christia, Fotini Enikolopov, Ruben Direct Democracy and Resource Allocation : Experimental Evidence from Afghanistan |
geographic_facet |
South Asia Afghanistan |
description |
Direct democracy is designed to better align policy outcomes with citizen preferences. To test this proposition, we randomized whether 250 villages across Afghanistan selected projects by secret-ballot referenda or by consultation meetings. We find that referenda reduce the influence of local elites over both project type and location. Consistent with previous experimental results, we also find that referenda improve villagers' perceptions of the local economy and of the quality of local governance. However, we find no systematic evidence that selecting projects via referenda increases the average impact of such projects. |
format |
Journal Article |
author |
Beath, Andrew Christia, Fotini Enikolopov, Ruben |
author_facet |
Beath, Andrew Christia, Fotini Enikolopov, Ruben |
author_sort |
Beath, Andrew |
title |
Direct Democracy and Resource Allocation : Experimental Evidence from Afghanistan |
title_short |
Direct Democracy and Resource Allocation : Experimental Evidence from Afghanistan |
title_full |
Direct Democracy and Resource Allocation : Experimental Evidence from Afghanistan |
title_fullStr |
Direct Democracy and Resource Allocation : Experimental Evidence from Afghanistan |
title_full_unstemmed |
Direct Democracy and Resource Allocation : Experimental Evidence from Afghanistan |
title_sort |
direct democracy and resource allocation : experimental evidence from afghanistan |
publisher |
Elsevier |
publishDate |
2018 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10986/29340 |
_version_ |
1764469103510159360 |