Direct Democracy and Resource Allocation : Experimental Evidence from Afghanistan
Direct democracy is designed to better align policy outcomes with citizen preferences. To test this proposition, we randomized whether 250 villages across Afghanistan selected projects by secret-ballot referenda or by consultation meetings. We find that referenda reduce the influence of local elites...
Main Authors: | Beath, Andrew, Christia, Fotini, Enikolopov, Ruben |
---|---|
Format: | Journal Article |
Published: |
Elsevier
2018
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/10986/29340 |
Similar Items
-
Direct Democracy and Resource Allocation : Experimental Evidence from Afghanistan
by: Beath, Andrew, et al.
Published: (2012) -
Do Elected Councils Improve Governance? Experimental Evidence on Local Institutions in Afghanistan
by: Beath, Andrew, et al.
Published: (2013) -
Electoral Rules and Political Selection : Theory and Evidence from a Field Experiment in Afghanistan
by: Beath, Andrew, et al.
Published: (2015) -
Randomized Impact Evaluation of Afghanistan's National Solidarity Programme : Final Report
by: Beath, Andrew, et al.
Published: (2014) -
The National Solidarity Program : Assessing the Effects of Community-Driven Development in Afghanistan
by: Beath, Andrew, et al.
Published: (2015)