Learning from Experiences with Implementation and Financing of Recovery and Peacebuilding Assessments, 1999–2017
The 2008 Joint Declaration on Post-Crisis Assessments and Recovery Planning envisions a common platform for action for the European Union (EU), the United Nations (UN), and the World Bank. The most prominent result was a shared methodology for post...
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Working Paper |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
World Bank, Washington, DC
2018
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/424491518076620208/Learning-from-experiences-with-implementation-and-financing-of-recovery-and-peacebuilding-assessments-1999-2017 http://hdl.handle.net/10986/29347 |
| Summary: | The 2008 Joint Declaration on
Post-Crisis Assessments and Recovery Planning envisions a
common platform for action for the European Union (EU), the
United Nations (UN), and the World Bank. The most prominent
result was a shared methodology for post-disaster needs
assessments (PDNAs) and post-conflict needs assessments
(PCNAs), the latter of which has evolved over time into the
present approach to recovery and peacebuilding assessments
(RPBAs). The most recent review of this experience,
completed in 2016 (Garrasi and Allen 2016), concluded that
the host governments and the three partner institutions had
not consistently followed up their assessments with coherent
action. The goal of this review was effectively to identify
lessons learned on what works for implementation and
financing. This paper is arranged as follows: Section 2
discusses on How to assess the effectiveness and
appropriateness of implementation and financing
arrangements; Section 3 explains the contextual variables
that shape what works, where, and why, drawing upon
variations between the case study countries; and Section 4
gives the options and potential approaches for the RPBA
process, governance and coordination, institutional
alignment and financing. |
|---|