Credit Risk Dynamics of Infrastructure Investment : Considerations for Financial Regulators
Prudential regulation of infrastructure investment plays an important role in creating an enabling environment for mobilizing long-term finance from institutional investors, such as insurance companies, and, thus, gives critical support to sustaina...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Working Paper |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
World Bank, Washington, DC
2018
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/125511521722022110/Credit-risk-dynamics-of-infrastructure-investment-considerations-for-financial-regulators http://hdl.handle.net/10986/29553 |
| id |
okr-10986-29553 |
|---|---|
| recordtype |
oai_dc |
| spelling |
okr-10986-295532021-06-14T10:10:38Z Credit Risk Dynamics of Infrastructure Investment : Considerations for Financial Regulators Jobst, Andreas A. PROJECT FINANCE CREDIT RISK INFRASTRUCTURE INVESTMENT INSURANCE REGULATION BANKING REGULATION INSURANCE CAPITAL SOLVENCY REGIME BASEL III Prudential regulation of infrastructure investment plays an important role in creating an enabling environment for mobilizing long-term finance from institutional investors, such as insurance companies, and, thus, gives critical support to sustainable development. Infrastructure projects are asset-intensive and generate predictable and stable cash flows over the long term, with low correlation to other assets; hence they provide a natural match for insurers' liabilities-driven investment strategies. The historical default experience of infrastructure debt suggests a "hump-shaped" credit risk profile, which converges to investment grade quality within a few years after financial close -- supported by a consistently high recovery rate with limited cross-country variation in non-accrual events. However, the resilient credit performance of infrastructure -- also in emerging market and developing economies -- is not reflected in the standardized approaches for credit risk in most regulatory frameworks. Capital charges would decline significantly for a differentiated regulatory treatment of infrastructure debt as a separate asset class. Supplementary analysis suggests that also banks would benefit from greater differentiation, but only over shorter risk horizons, encouraging a more efficient allocation of capital by shifting the supply of long-term funding to insurers. 2018-03-30T16:37:48Z 2018-03-30T16:37:48Z 2018-03 Working Paper http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/125511521722022110/Credit-risk-dynamics-of-infrastructure-investment-considerations-for-financial-regulators http://hdl.handle.net/10986/29553 English Policy Research Working Paper;No. 8373 CC BY 3.0 IGO http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo World Bank World Bank, Washington, DC Publications & Research Publications & Research :: Policy Research Working Paper |
| repository_type |
Digital Repository |
| institution_category |
Foreign Institution |
| institution |
Digital Repositories |
| building |
World Bank Open Knowledge Repository |
| collection |
World Bank |
| language |
English |
| topic |
PROJECT FINANCE CREDIT RISK INFRASTRUCTURE INVESTMENT INSURANCE REGULATION BANKING REGULATION INSURANCE CAPITAL SOLVENCY REGIME BASEL III |
| spellingShingle |
PROJECT FINANCE CREDIT RISK INFRASTRUCTURE INVESTMENT INSURANCE REGULATION BANKING REGULATION INSURANCE CAPITAL SOLVENCY REGIME BASEL III Jobst, Andreas A. Credit Risk Dynamics of Infrastructure Investment : Considerations for Financial Regulators |
| relation |
Policy Research Working Paper;No. 8373 |
| description |
Prudential regulation of infrastructure
investment plays an important role in creating an enabling
environment for mobilizing long-term finance from
institutional investors, such as insurance companies, and,
thus, gives critical support to sustainable development.
Infrastructure projects are asset-intensive and generate
predictable and stable cash flows over the long term, with
low correlation to other assets; hence they provide a
natural match for insurers' liabilities-driven
investment strategies. The historical default experience of
infrastructure debt suggests a "hump-shaped"
credit risk profile, which converges to investment grade
quality within a few years after financial close --
supported by a consistently high recovery rate with limited
cross-country variation in non-accrual events. However, the
resilient credit performance of infrastructure -- also in
emerging market and developing economies -- is not reflected
in the standardized approaches for credit risk in most
regulatory frameworks. Capital charges would decline
significantly for a differentiated regulatory treatment of
infrastructure debt as a separate asset class. Supplementary
analysis suggests that also banks would benefit from greater
differentiation, but only over shorter risk horizons,
encouraging a more efficient allocation of capital by
shifting the supply of long-term funding to insurers. |
| format |
Working Paper |
| author |
Jobst, Andreas A. |
| author_facet |
Jobst, Andreas A. |
| author_sort |
Jobst, Andreas A. |
| title |
Credit Risk Dynamics of Infrastructure Investment : Considerations for Financial Regulators |
| title_short |
Credit Risk Dynamics of Infrastructure Investment : Considerations for Financial Regulators |
| title_full |
Credit Risk Dynamics of Infrastructure Investment : Considerations for Financial Regulators |
| title_fullStr |
Credit Risk Dynamics of Infrastructure Investment : Considerations for Financial Regulators |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Credit Risk Dynamics of Infrastructure Investment : Considerations for Financial Regulators |
| title_sort |
credit risk dynamics of infrastructure investment : considerations for financial regulators |
| publisher |
World Bank, Washington, DC |
| publishDate |
2018 |
| url |
http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/125511521722022110/Credit-risk-dynamics-of-infrastructure-investment-considerations-for-financial-regulators http://hdl.handle.net/10986/29553 |
| _version_ |
1764469700784291840 |