Why Are So Many Water Points in Nigeria Non-Functional? : An Empirical Analysis of Contributing Factors

This paper utilizes information from the 2015 Nigeria National Water and Sanitation Survey to identify the extent, timing, as well as reasons for the failure of water points. The paper finds that more than 38 percent of all improved water points ar...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Andres, Luis, Chellaraj, Gnanaraj, Das Gupta, Basab, Grabinsky, Jonathan, Joseph, George
Format: Working Paper
Language:English
Published: World Bank, Washington, DC 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/363491522264585702/Why-are-so-many-water-points-in-Nigeria-non-functional-an-empirical-analysis-of-contributing-factors
http://hdl.handle.net/10986/29568
id okr-10986-29568
recordtype oai_dc
spelling okr-10986-295682021-06-08T14:42:45Z Why Are So Many Water Points in Nigeria Non-Functional? : An Empirical Analysis of Contributing Factors Andres, Luis Chellaraj, Gnanaraj Das Gupta, Basab Grabinsky, Jonathan Joseph, George WATER AND SANITATION DRINKING WATER RURAL WATER SUPPLY ACCESS TO WATER SAFE WATER SUPPLY This paper utilizes information from the 2015 Nigeria National Water and Sanitation Survey to identify the extent, timing, as well as reasons for the failure of water points. The paper finds that more than 38 percent of all improved water points are nonfunctional. The results indicate that nearly 27 percent of the water points are likely to fail in the first year of construction, while nearly 40 percent are likely to fail in the long run (after 8-10 years). The paper considers the reasons behind these failures, looking at whether they can or cannot be controlled. During the first year, a water point's location -- the political region and underlying hydrogeology -- has the greatest impact on functionality. Other factors—specifically, those that can be controlled in the design, implementation, and operational stages -- also contribute significantly. As water points age, their likelihood of failure is best predicted by factors that cannot be modified, as well as by the technology used. The paper concludes that, to improve the sustainability of water points, much can be done at the design, implementation, and operational stages. Over time, technology upgrades are important. 2018-03-30T19:50:07Z 2018-03-30T19:50:07Z 2018-03 Working Paper http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/363491522264585702/Why-are-so-many-water-points-in-Nigeria-non-functional-an-empirical-analysis-of-contributing-factors http://hdl.handle.net/10986/29568 English Policy Research Working Paper;No. 8388 CC BY 3.0 IGO http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo World Bank World Bank, Washington, DC Publications & Research Publications & Research :: Policy Research Working Paper Africa Nigeria
repository_type Digital Repository
institution_category Foreign Institution
institution Digital Repositories
building World Bank Open Knowledge Repository
collection World Bank
language English
topic WATER AND SANITATION
DRINKING WATER
RURAL WATER SUPPLY
ACCESS TO WATER
SAFE WATER SUPPLY
spellingShingle WATER AND SANITATION
DRINKING WATER
RURAL WATER SUPPLY
ACCESS TO WATER
SAFE WATER SUPPLY
Andres, Luis
Chellaraj, Gnanaraj
Das Gupta, Basab
Grabinsky, Jonathan
Joseph, George
Why Are So Many Water Points in Nigeria Non-Functional? : An Empirical Analysis of Contributing Factors
geographic_facet Africa
Nigeria
relation Policy Research Working Paper;No. 8388
description This paper utilizes information from the 2015 Nigeria National Water and Sanitation Survey to identify the extent, timing, as well as reasons for the failure of water points. The paper finds that more than 38 percent of all improved water points are nonfunctional. The results indicate that nearly 27 percent of the water points are likely to fail in the first year of construction, while nearly 40 percent are likely to fail in the long run (after 8-10 years). The paper considers the reasons behind these failures, looking at whether they can or cannot be controlled. During the first year, a water point's location -- the political region and underlying hydrogeology -- has the greatest impact on functionality. Other factors—specifically, those that can be controlled in the design, implementation, and operational stages -- also contribute significantly. As water points age, their likelihood of failure is best predicted by factors that cannot be modified, as well as by the technology used. The paper concludes that, to improve the sustainability of water points, much can be done at the design, implementation, and operational stages. Over time, technology upgrades are important.
format Working Paper
author Andres, Luis
Chellaraj, Gnanaraj
Das Gupta, Basab
Grabinsky, Jonathan
Joseph, George
author_facet Andres, Luis
Chellaraj, Gnanaraj
Das Gupta, Basab
Grabinsky, Jonathan
Joseph, George
author_sort Andres, Luis
title Why Are So Many Water Points in Nigeria Non-Functional? : An Empirical Analysis of Contributing Factors
title_short Why Are So Many Water Points in Nigeria Non-Functional? : An Empirical Analysis of Contributing Factors
title_full Why Are So Many Water Points in Nigeria Non-Functional? : An Empirical Analysis of Contributing Factors
title_fullStr Why Are So Many Water Points in Nigeria Non-Functional? : An Empirical Analysis of Contributing Factors
title_full_unstemmed Why Are So Many Water Points in Nigeria Non-Functional? : An Empirical Analysis of Contributing Factors
title_sort why are so many water points in nigeria non-functional? : an empirical analysis of contributing factors
publisher World Bank, Washington, DC
publishDate 2018
url http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/363491522264585702/Why-are-so-many-water-points-in-Nigeria-non-functional-an-empirical-analysis-of-contributing-factors
http://hdl.handle.net/10986/29568
_version_ 1764469738543513600