Infrastructure Finance in Armenia

In order to sustain economic growth, Armenia needs to invest in infrastructure – much of this on a commercial basis given the limited fiscal space available and high level of public debt. The private sector has actively participated in infrastructu...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: World Bank Group
Format: Policy Note
Language:English
Published: World Bank, Washington, DC 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/575401530192599240/Infrastructure-finance-in-Armenia-policy-note
http://hdl.handle.net/10986/30271
id okr-10986-30271
recordtype oai_dc
spelling okr-10986-302712021-05-25T09:17:06Z Infrastructure Finance in Armenia World Bank Group INFRASTRUCTURE FINANCE INFRASTRUCTURE NEEDS INVESTMENT CLIMATE FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION PUBLIC INVESTMENT PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS In order to sustain economic growth, Armenia needs to invest in infrastructure – much of this on a commercial basis given the limited fiscal space available and high level of public debt. The private sector has actively participated in infrastructure investment in Armenia, notably by way of divestiture, concessions, lease, and management contracts. Beyond direct state funding from current tax revenues, infrastructure investment can be commercially financed through a mix of (a) public finance (borrowing guaranteed by the state), (b) corporate finance (loans to corporate borrowers), (c) project finance (loans to project companies repaid from future cash flows).This entails, successively: (i) identifying whether parts of an infrastructure development program can be financed on commercial terms; (ii) when commercial financing is not viable, undertake upstream reforms to strengthen policies, regulations, institutions and capacity; (iii) if reforms are not sufficient, explore the possibility of deploying concessional and public resources to strengthen the bankability of priority investments; and finally (iv) where commercial financing is not feasible despite sector reform and risk mitigation, mobilize public and concessional resources. Armenia’s infrastructure finance agenda touches upon three key dimensions: (a) the origination of an abundant, mature pipeline of bankable infrastructure projects, (b) a business climateconducive to commercial investment in infrastructure, and (c) the availability of long-term financing for infrastructure projects. The country needs to systematize its pipeline of infrastructure projects and strengthen the origination of transactions. The existing regulatory framework needs to incorporate specific provisions for PPPs, and practices need to be improved. Going forward, financing from multilateral and bilateral sources will need to be complemented by other sources, notably international and domestic commercial banks. Local banks have increased long-term lending in recent years, but still only have limited involvement in infrastructure finance. Internationally, states have attempted various types of interventions in support of infrastructure finance. First, the state may support priority projects that are economically viable, but whose financial returns are not high enough, or are sufficiently predictable, to attract the interest of private sector investors. Such schemes, involving financial viability support (FVS), are generally incorporated in the host country’s PPP framework, and can take different forms, such viability gap funds (VGF) and availability payment (AP) schemes. Given the size of the economy, and the dearth of bankable projects, priority should be given to assessing the feasibility of financial viability support, and possibly wholesale financial sectorinterventions, rather than retail interventions. 2018-08-21T15:46:23Z 2018-08-21T15:46:23Z 2017-12 Policy Note http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/575401530192599240/Infrastructure-finance-in-Armenia-policy-note http://hdl.handle.net/10986/30271 English CC BY 3.0 IGO http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo World Bank World Bank, Washington, DC Economic & Sector Work :: Policy Notes Economic & Sector Work Europe and Central Asia Armenia
repository_type Digital Repository
institution_category Foreign Institution
institution Digital Repositories
building World Bank Open Knowledge Repository
collection World Bank
language English
topic INFRASTRUCTURE FINANCE
INFRASTRUCTURE NEEDS
INVESTMENT CLIMATE
FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION
PUBLIC INVESTMENT
PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS
spellingShingle INFRASTRUCTURE FINANCE
INFRASTRUCTURE NEEDS
INVESTMENT CLIMATE
FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION
PUBLIC INVESTMENT
PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS
World Bank Group
Infrastructure Finance in Armenia
geographic_facet Europe and Central Asia
Armenia
description In order to sustain economic growth, Armenia needs to invest in infrastructure – much of this on a commercial basis given the limited fiscal space available and high level of public debt. The private sector has actively participated in infrastructure investment in Armenia, notably by way of divestiture, concessions, lease, and management contracts. Beyond direct state funding from current tax revenues, infrastructure investment can be commercially financed through a mix of (a) public finance (borrowing guaranteed by the state), (b) corporate finance (loans to corporate borrowers), (c) project finance (loans to project companies repaid from future cash flows).This entails, successively: (i) identifying whether parts of an infrastructure development program can be financed on commercial terms; (ii) when commercial financing is not viable, undertake upstream reforms to strengthen policies, regulations, institutions and capacity; (iii) if reforms are not sufficient, explore the possibility of deploying concessional and public resources to strengthen the bankability of priority investments; and finally (iv) where commercial financing is not feasible despite sector reform and risk mitigation, mobilize public and concessional resources. Armenia’s infrastructure finance agenda touches upon three key dimensions: (a) the origination of an abundant, mature pipeline of bankable infrastructure projects, (b) a business climateconducive to commercial investment in infrastructure, and (c) the availability of long-term financing for infrastructure projects. The country needs to systematize its pipeline of infrastructure projects and strengthen the origination of transactions. The existing regulatory framework needs to incorporate specific provisions for PPPs, and practices need to be improved. Going forward, financing from multilateral and bilateral sources will need to be complemented by other sources, notably international and domestic commercial banks. Local banks have increased long-term lending in recent years, but still only have limited involvement in infrastructure finance. Internationally, states have attempted various types of interventions in support of infrastructure finance. First, the state may support priority projects that are economically viable, but whose financial returns are not high enough, or are sufficiently predictable, to attract the interest of private sector investors. Such schemes, involving financial viability support (FVS), are generally incorporated in the host country’s PPP framework, and can take different forms, such viability gap funds (VGF) and availability payment (AP) schemes. Given the size of the economy, and the dearth of bankable projects, priority should be given to assessing the feasibility of financial viability support, and possibly wholesale financial sectorinterventions, rather than retail interventions.
format Policy Note
author World Bank Group
author_facet World Bank Group
author_sort World Bank Group
title Infrastructure Finance in Armenia
title_short Infrastructure Finance in Armenia
title_full Infrastructure Finance in Armenia
title_fullStr Infrastructure Finance in Armenia
title_full_unstemmed Infrastructure Finance in Armenia
title_sort infrastructure finance in armenia
publisher World Bank, Washington, DC
publishDate 2018
url http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/575401530192599240/Infrastructure-finance-in-Armenia-policy-note
http://hdl.handle.net/10986/30271
_version_ 1764471577355747328