Mexico - Analysis of the Information, Monitoring, and Evaluation Guidelines of the Programs in the Public Federal Administration
This collection of works represents the results of a 'fee for services' contract with the National Evaluation Council of the Policy for Social Development in Mexico (CONEVAL), enforced between 2007 and 2008. The goal of the job was to pro...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Other Poverty Study |
Language: | English |
Published: |
World Bank
2012
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www-wds.worldbank.org/external/default/main?menuPK=64187510&pagePK=64193027&piPK=64187937&theSitePK=523679&menuPK=64187510&searchMenuPK=64187283&siteName=WDS&entityID=000333037_20090828014546 http://hdl.handle.net/10986/3098 |
Summary: | This collection of works represents the
results of a 'fee for services' contract with the
National Evaluation Council of the Policy for Social
Development in Mexico (CONEVAL), enforced between 2007 and
2008. The goal of the job was to provide support to CONEVAL
in the strengthening of the general guidelines of evaluation
of the federal programmers of the federal public
administration that were published in March 2007 by CONEVAL
itself, the ministry of the treasury and public credit and
the public function. It was for such a purpose that the team
of the World Bank worked on four different reports that
looked at providing an integral analysis of the guidelines.
The four reports include: an executive summary, an
institutional analysis of the guidelines, a management tools
analysis of the guidelines, and an analysis of the basic
information within the context of the guidelines. The
guidelines were published to consolidate the vision of the
Mexican government to create a 'menu of
evaluations' aimed at providing different key users
within the public administration with performance
information that will serve their different needs. It is
within this context that the analysis had as its general
objective to analyze the results of the first year of the
implementation of the 2007 guidelines and also to reflect on
the content of the guidelines based on international experience. |
---|