Indonesia : Long-Term Generasi Qualitative Study

Indonesia : Long-Term Generasi Qualitative Study

In 2007, the government of Indonesia (GoI) introduced PNPM Generasi (National Community Empowerment Program—Healthy and Smart Generation, Program Nasional Pemberdayaan Masyarakat—Generasi Sehat dan Cerdas) to address key policy priorities and the M...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: World Bank
Format: Report
Language:English
Published: World Bank, Jakarta 2018
Subjects:
MATERNAL HEALTH
CHILD HEALTH
ACCESS TO EDUCATION
BASIC EDUCATION
POVERTY REDUCTION
COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION
EMPOWERMENT
FACILITATORS
VILLAGE GOVERNANCE
SERVICE DELIVERY
Online Access:http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/102101542808714703/Indonesia-Long-Term-Generasi-Qualitative-Study
http://hdl.handle.net/10986/31010
id okr-10986-31010
recordtype oai_dc
spelling okr-10986-310102021-05-25T09:20:23Z Indonesia : Long-Term Generasi Qualitative Study World Bank MATERNAL HEALTH CHILD HEALTH ACCESS TO EDUCATION BASIC EDUCATION POVERTY REDUCTION COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION EMPOWERMENT FACILITATORS VILLAGE GOVERNANCE SERVICE DELIVERY In 2007, the government of Indonesia (GoI) introduced PNPM Generasi (National Community Empowerment Program—Healthy and Smart Generation, Program Nasional Pemberdayaan Masyarakat—Generasi Sehat dan Cerdas) to address key policy priorities and the Millennium Development Goals—reducing poverty, maternal mortality, and child mortality, as well as ensuring universal coverage of basic education. To facilitate a rigorous evaluation of the program, GoI (working with the World Bank and the Abdul Latif Jameel Poverty Action Lab) randomly assigned Generasi locations for the pilot phase (2007–2009). A randomized evaluation of two different versions of the program (with and without performance bonuses) was conducted in three rounds (Wave I at baseline, Wave II eighteen months after implementation, and Wave III thirty months after implementation). In 2016-2017, the impact evaluation (IE) team fielded a follow-up survey in the same subdistricts as the first three waves. A separate report analyzes the quantitative findings of this final survey. During the final survey round, the IE team also collected qualitative data in geographically distinct treatment and control communities to explore two problems:1) first, whether Generasi’s three components—facilitation, community participation, and the target and performance bonus system—functioning as intended; second, what is the program’s long-term impact on village governance and service delivery, and how it can influence Village Law implementation 2018-12-18T20:36:00Z 2018-12-18T20:36:00Z 2018-11 Report http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/102101542808714703/Indonesia-Long-Term-Generasi-Qualitative-Study http://hdl.handle.net/10986/31010 English CC BY 3.0 IGO http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo World Bank World Bank, Jakarta Economic & Sector Work :: Other Social Protection Study Economic & Sector Work East Asia and Pacific Indonesia
repository_type Digital Repository
institution_category Foreign Institution
institution Digital Repositories
building World Bank Open Knowledge Repository
collection World Bank
language English
topic MATERNAL HEALTH
CHILD HEALTH
ACCESS TO EDUCATION
BASIC EDUCATION
POVERTY REDUCTION
COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION
EMPOWERMENT
FACILITATORS
VILLAGE GOVERNANCE
SERVICE DELIVERY
spellingShingle MATERNAL HEALTH
CHILD HEALTH
ACCESS TO EDUCATION
BASIC EDUCATION
POVERTY REDUCTION
COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION
EMPOWERMENT
FACILITATORS
VILLAGE GOVERNANCE
SERVICE DELIVERY
World Bank
Indonesia : Long-Term Generasi Qualitative Study
geographic_facet East Asia and Pacific
Indonesia
description In 2007, the government of Indonesia (GoI) introduced PNPM Generasi (National Community Empowerment Program—Healthy and Smart Generation, Program Nasional Pemberdayaan Masyarakat—Generasi Sehat dan Cerdas) to address key policy priorities and the Millennium Development Goals—reducing poverty, maternal mortality, and child mortality, as well as ensuring universal coverage of basic education. To facilitate a rigorous evaluation of the program, GoI (working with the World Bank and the Abdul Latif Jameel Poverty Action Lab) randomly assigned Generasi locations for the pilot phase (2007–2009). A randomized evaluation of two different versions of the program (with and without performance bonuses) was conducted in three rounds (Wave I at baseline, Wave II eighteen months after implementation, and Wave III thirty months after implementation). In 2016-2017, the impact evaluation (IE) team fielded a follow-up survey in the same subdistricts as the first three waves. A separate report analyzes the quantitative findings of this final survey. During the final survey round, the IE team also collected qualitative data in geographically distinct treatment and control communities to explore two problems:1) first, whether Generasi’s three components—facilitation, community participation, and the target and performance bonus system—functioning as intended; second, what is the program’s long-term impact on village governance and service delivery, and how it can influence Village Law implementation
format Report
author World Bank
author_facet World Bank
author_sort World Bank
title Indonesia : Long-Term Generasi Qualitative Study
title_short Indonesia : Long-Term Generasi Qualitative Study
title_full Indonesia : Long-Term Generasi Qualitative Study
title_fullStr Indonesia : Long-Term Generasi Qualitative Study
title_full_unstemmed Indonesia : Long-Term Generasi Qualitative Study
title_sort indonesia : long-term generasi qualitative study
publisher World Bank, Jakarta
publishDate 2018
url http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/102101542808714703/Indonesia-Long-Term-Generasi-Qualitative-Study
http://hdl.handle.net/10986/31010
_version_ 1764473385571581952

Similar Items