Why Do Some Countries Default More Often Than Others? The Role of Institutions
This paper examines how a country's weak institutions and polarized government can affect the likelihood of its default on sovereign debt. Using a data set of 90 countries, it shows that strong institutions are associated with fewer sovereign...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Policy Research Working Paper |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2012
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www-wds.worldbank.org/external/default/main?menuPK=64187510&pagePK=64193027&piPK=64187937&theSitePK=523679&menuPK=64187510&searchMenuPK=64187283&siteName=WDS&entityID=000158349_20120312132447 http://hdl.handle.net/10986/3282 |
Summary: | This paper examines how a country's
weak institutions and polarized government can affect the
likelihood of its default on sovereign debt. Using a data
set of 90 countries, it shows that strong institutions are
associated with fewer sovereign default crises. In addition,
when institutions are weak, a more polarized government
tends to default more often. To explain these findings, the
author develops a model showing the dynamics between the
quality of institutions, the level of government
polarization and sovereign default risk. Countries default
more often when they lack rules and strong institutions to
curb the influence of powerful groups on government
policies. That is because in a polarized government, each
powerful group makes decisions without considering the
impact on other groups. Simulations of the model show that
more than half the cross-country variation in sovereign
default frequencies can be explained by institutional
quality and the degree of government polarization observed
in the data. |
---|