A Comparison of CAPI and PAPI through a Randomized Field Experiment
This paper reports on a randomized survey experiment among one thousand eight hundred and forty households, designed to compare pen-and-paper interviewing (PAPI) to computer-assisted personal interviewing (CAPI). The authors find that PAPI data con...
Main Authors: | Caeyers, Bet, Chalmers, Neil, De Weerdt, Joachim |
---|---|
Format: | Working Paper |
Language: | English |
Published: |
World Bank, Washington, DC
2020
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/467401588063959793/A-Comparison-of-CAPI-and-PAPI-through-a-Randomized-Field-Experiment http://hdl.handle.net/10986/33699 |
Similar Items
-
Effects of Data Collection Methods on Estimated Household Consumption and Survey Costs : Evidence from an Experiment in the Marshall Islands
by: Sharp, Michael K., et al.
Published: (2022) -
Private But Misunderstood? : Evidence on Measuring Intimate Partner Violence via Self-Interviewing in Rural Liberia and Malawi
by: Park, David Sungho, et al.
Published: (2022) -
Fecal Sludge Management Tools : Data Collection Instruments
by: World Bank Group
Published: (2016) -
Papie, the magic paper
by: Faranina
Published: (2006) -
In Pursuit of Balance : Randomization in Practice in Development Field Experiments
by: Bruhn, Miriam, et al.
Published: (2012)