Policy Assessment in the OECD : Lessons for Chile

Chile is well-advanced in the field of program and project evaluation, with adequate institutions and procedures in place, and has achieved a very high standard by any international comparison. DIPRES has established a system of evaluations of soun...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: World Bank
Format: Report
Language:English
Published: World Bank, Washington, DC 2020
Subjects:
Online Access:http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/948101607670582911/Policy-Assessment-in-the-OECD-Lessons-for-Chile
http://hdl.handle.net/10986/34922
id okr-10986-34922
recordtype oai_dc
spelling okr-10986-349222021-04-23T14:02:11Z Policy Assessment in the OECD : Lessons for Chile World Bank POVERTY REDUCTION AND ECONOMIC MANAGEMENT POLICY PROCESS POLICY ASSESSMENT POLICY MAKING GOVERNANCE EVALUATION Chile is well-advanced in the field of program and project evaluation, with adequate institutions and procedures in place, and has achieved a very high standard by any international comparison. DIPRES has established a system of evaluations of sound quality. This system promotes the utilization of evaluation results in management decisions, including budget decision. The outsourcing of evaluations guarantees technical and political independence of program and project evaluations, while increasing their credibility. On the other hand, policy evaluation in Chile is mainly an ad-hoc and spontaneous activity, with no definite procedures or standards. Regardless of the quality of those sporadic evaluations, the fact remains that no one is responsible for the selection, methods, implementation, financing, and utilization of the results of policy evaluations. This report will focus on developing a strategy and instruments for further institutionalizing public policy assessment in Chile. The first chapter discusses definitions and concepts related to the public policy process and describes the scope of this report. Chapter second examines the policy processes of six Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) countries, including federal countries such as Canada and the United States (U.S.) and unitary countries similar to Chile. Chapter third takes the OECD context as background to analyze Chile’s own policy process and lays out challenges to improving the policy process in Chile. Chapter fourth builds on the previous analysis to offer a number of possible directions Chile can take to achieve its goal of strengthening public policy assessment. 2020-12-14T16:11:04Z 2020-12-14T16:11:04Z 2010-02-01 Report http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/948101607670582911/Policy-Assessment-in-the-OECD-Lessons-for-Chile http://hdl.handle.net/10986/34922 English CC BY 3.0 IGO http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo World Bank World Bank, Washington, DC Economic & Sector Work Economic & Sector Work :: Institutional and Governance Review Latin America & Caribbean Canada Chile France New Zealand Spain United Kingdom United States
repository_type Digital Repository
institution_category Foreign Institution
institution Digital Repositories
building World Bank Open Knowledge Repository
collection World Bank
language English
topic POVERTY REDUCTION AND ECONOMIC MANAGEMENT
POLICY PROCESS
POLICY ASSESSMENT
POLICY MAKING
GOVERNANCE
EVALUATION
spellingShingle POVERTY REDUCTION AND ECONOMIC MANAGEMENT
POLICY PROCESS
POLICY ASSESSMENT
POLICY MAKING
GOVERNANCE
EVALUATION
World Bank
Policy Assessment in the OECD : Lessons for Chile
geographic_facet Latin America & Caribbean
Canada
Chile
France
New Zealand
Spain
United Kingdom
United States
description Chile is well-advanced in the field of program and project evaluation, with adequate institutions and procedures in place, and has achieved a very high standard by any international comparison. DIPRES has established a system of evaluations of sound quality. This system promotes the utilization of evaluation results in management decisions, including budget decision. The outsourcing of evaluations guarantees technical and political independence of program and project evaluations, while increasing their credibility. On the other hand, policy evaluation in Chile is mainly an ad-hoc and spontaneous activity, with no definite procedures or standards. Regardless of the quality of those sporadic evaluations, the fact remains that no one is responsible for the selection, methods, implementation, financing, and utilization of the results of policy evaluations. This report will focus on developing a strategy and instruments for further institutionalizing public policy assessment in Chile. The first chapter discusses definitions and concepts related to the public policy process and describes the scope of this report. Chapter second examines the policy processes of six Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) countries, including federal countries such as Canada and the United States (U.S.) and unitary countries similar to Chile. Chapter third takes the OECD context as background to analyze Chile’s own policy process and lays out challenges to improving the policy process in Chile. Chapter fourth builds on the previous analysis to offer a number of possible directions Chile can take to achieve its goal of strengthening public policy assessment.
format Report
author World Bank
author_facet World Bank
author_sort World Bank
title Policy Assessment in the OECD : Lessons for Chile
title_short Policy Assessment in the OECD : Lessons for Chile
title_full Policy Assessment in the OECD : Lessons for Chile
title_fullStr Policy Assessment in the OECD : Lessons for Chile
title_full_unstemmed Policy Assessment in the OECD : Lessons for Chile
title_sort policy assessment in the oecd : lessons for chile
publisher World Bank, Washington, DC
publishDate 2020
url http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/948101607670582911/Policy-Assessment-in-the-OECD-Lessons-for-Chile
http://hdl.handle.net/10986/34922
_version_ 1764481940026556416