Two For One : How Leveraging Small Claims Procedures Can Improve Judicial Efficiency and Access to Justice

People often argue about little things in both their personal and their business relationships. From a legal perspective, low-value monetary disputes are known as small claims. The monetary threshold for a claim to be qualified as “small” is genera...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Petkova, Svetozara, Senderayi, Runyararo Gladys
Format: Brief
Language:English
Published: World Bank, Washington, DC 2020
Subjects:
Online Access:http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/487041607706210590/Two-For-One-How-Leveraging-Small-Claims-Procedures-Can-Improve-Judicial-Efficiency-and-Access-to-Justice
http://hdl.handle.net/10986/34927
id okr-10986-34927
recordtype oai_dc
spelling okr-10986-349272021-04-23T14:02:11Z Two For One : How Leveraging Small Claims Procedures Can Improve Judicial Efficiency and Access to Justice Petkova, Svetozara Senderayi, Runyararo Gladys SMALL CLAIMS PROCEDURE ACCESS TO JUSTICE SMALL AND MEDIUM SIZE ENTERPRISE CASE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM People often argue about little things in both their personal and their business relationships. From a legal perspective, low-value monetary disputes are known as small claims. The monetary threshold for a claim to be qualified as “small” is generally determined by the economic conditions of a country, but it can also reflect a policy choice to subject a subset of the overall demand for court services to specific procedural rules. Given the frequency of small claims if they are not resolved quickly and efficiently, they can inundate the justice system, drain limited judicial resources, and generate case backlogs, while ruining personal relationships and frustrating business operations. Conversely, some small claims cases do not even get to have their day in court because litigation is too costly for many ordinary citizens. This means that access to justice is hindered. Therefore, unresolved small claims can exacerbate inefficiency in court processes and contribute to a lack of access to justice. Societies cannot afford to let a growing body of minor disputes clog justice systems, stall economic activity, and fuel social tensions. Thus, an increasing number of countries are designing special rules for such disputes; these are often known as small claims, simplified, or fast-track procedures. Currently, as many as 132 economies have either a stand-alone small claims court or a simplified procedure for small claims. 2020-12-14T20:31:20Z 2020-12-14T20:31:20Z 2020-12-10 Brief http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/487041607706210590/Two-For-One-How-Leveraging-Small-Claims-Procedures-Can-Improve-Judicial-Efficiency-and-Access-to-Justice http://hdl.handle.net/10986/34927 English Equitable Growth, Finance and Institutions Notes; CC BY 3.0 IGO http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo World Bank World Bank, Washington, DC Publications & Research Publications & Research :: Brief
repository_type Digital Repository
institution_category Foreign Institution
institution Digital Repositories
building World Bank Open Knowledge Repository
collection World Bank
language English
topic SMALL CLAIMS PROCEDURE
ACCESS TO JUSTICE
SMALL AND MEDIUM SIZE ENTERPRISE
CASE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
spellingShingle SMALL CLAIMS PROCEDURE
ACCESS TO JUSTICE
SMALL AND MEDIUM SIZE ENTERPRISE
CASE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
Petkova, Svetozara
Senderayi, Runyararo Gladys
Two For One : How Leveraging Small Claims Procedures Can Improve Judicial Efficiency and Access to Justice
relation Equitable Growth, Finance and Institutions Notes;
description People often argue about little things in both their personal and their business relationships. From a legal perspective, low-value monetary disputes are known as small claims. The monetary threshold for a claim to be qualified as “small” is generally determined by the economic conditions of a country, but it can also reflect a policy choice to subject a subset of the overall demand for court services to specific procedural rules. Given the frequency of small claims if they are not resolved quickly and efficiently, they can inundate the justice system, drain limited judicial resources, and generate case backlogs, while ruining personal relationships and frustrating business operations. Conversely, some small claims cases do not even get to have their day in court because litigation is too costly for many ordinary citizens. This means that access to justice is hindered. Therefore, unresolved small claims can exacerbate inefficiency in court processes and contribute to a lack of access to justice. Societies cannot afford to let a growing body of minor disputes clog justice systems, stall economic activity, and fuel social tensions. Thus, an increasing number of countries are designing special rules for such disputes; these are often known as small claims, simplified, or fast-track procedures. Currently, as many as 132 economies have either a stand-alone small claims court or a simplified procedure for small claims.
format Brief
author Petkova, Svetozara
Senderayi, Runyararo Gladys
author_facet Petkova, Svetozara
Senderayi, Runyararo Gladys
author_sort Petkova, Svetozara
title Two For One : How Leveraging Small Claims Procedures Can Improve Judicial Efficiency and Access to Justice
title_short Two For One : How Leveraging Small Claims Procedures Can Improve Judicial Efficiency and Access to Justice
title_full Two For One : How Leveraging Small Claims Procedures Can Improve Judicial Efficiency and Access to Justice
title_fullStr Two For One : How Leveraging Small Claims Procedures Can Improve Judicial Efficiency and Access to Justice
title_full_unstemmed Two For One : How Leveraging Small Claims Procedures Can Improve Judicial Efficiency and Access to Justice
title_sort two for one : how leveraging small claims procedures can improve judicial efficiency and access to justice
publisher World Bank, Washington, DC
publishDate 2020
url http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/487041607706210590/Two-For-One-How-Leveraging-Small-Claims-Procedures-Can-Improve-Judicial-Efficiency-and-Access-to-Justice
http://hdl.handle.net/10986/34927
_version_ 1764481950361321472