Do Institutions Matter for FDI Spillovers? The Implications of China’s “Special Characteristics”
The authors investigate how institutions affect productivity spillovers from foreign direct investment (FDI) to China's domestic industrial enterprises during 1998-2007. They examine three institutional features that comprise aspects of China&...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Policy Research Working Paper |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2012
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www-wds.worldbank.org/external/default/main?menuPK=64187510&pagePK=64193027&piPK=64187937&theSitePK=523679&menuPK=64187510&searchMenuPK=64187283&siteName=WDS&entityID=000158349_20110815095155 http://hdl.handle.net/10986/3518 |
Summary: | The authors investigate how institutions
affect productivity spillovers from foreign direct
investment (FDI) to China's domestic industrial
enterprises during 1998-2007. They examine three
institutional features that comprise aspects of China's
"special characteristics": (1) the different
sources of FDI, where FDI is nearly evenly divided between
mostly Organization for Economic Co-operation and
Development (OECD) countries and Hong Kong (SAR of China),
Taiwan (China), and Macau (SAR of China); (2) China's
heterogeneous ownership structure, involving state- (SOEs)
and non-state owned (non-SOEs) enterprises, firms with
foreign equity participation, and non-SOE, domestic firms;
and (3) industrial promotion via tariffs or through tax
holidays to foreign direct investment. The authors also
explore how productivity spillovers from FDI changed with
China's entry into the WTO in late 2001. They find
robust positive and significant spillovers to domestic firms
via backward linkages (the contacts between foreign buyers
and local suppliers). The results suggest varied success
with industrial promotion policies. Final goods tariffs as
well as input tariffs are negatively associated with
firm-level productivity. However, they find that
productivity spillovers were higher from foreign firms that
paid less than the statutory corporate tax rate. |
---|