South Sudan’s Infrastructure : A Continental Perspective
Newly independent South Sudan faces a challenge in making its own way in infrastructure development. Despite earning $6 billion in oil revenues since 2005, South Sudan's spending has not been proportional to its income, but rather has lagged b...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Policy Research Working Paper |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2012
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www-wds.worldbank.org/external/default/main?menuPK=64187510&pagePK=64193027&piPK=64187937&theSitePK=523679&menuPK=64187510&searchMenuPK=64187283&siteName=WDS&entityID=000158349_20110927142346 http://hdl.handle.net/10986/3577 |
Summary: | Newly independent South Sudan faces a
challenge in making its own way in infrastructure
development. Despite earning $6 billion in oil revenues
since 2005, South Sudan's spending has not been
proportional to its income, but rather has lagged behind
North Sudan's development of infrastructure and social
support. South Sudan benefitted from strong donor support
during 2004-10, the interim period defined by the
Comprehensive Peace Agreement. It focused on reestablishing
regional transport links and access to seaports as well as
rehabilitating its ports, airstrips, and single rail line.
South Sudan also successfully liberalized the ICT sector.
Nonetheless, the new country's infrastructure remains
in such a dismal state that it is difficult to pinpoint a
single most pressing challenge. The transport sector
accounts for half of the country's spending needs, and
water and sanitation account for a further quarter of the
total. But so many improvements are needed that the nation
cannot realistically catch up with its neighbors within 10
years, or even longer. South Sudan's annual
infrastructure funding gap is $879 million per year. Given
that the country's total needs are beyond its reach in
the medium term, it must adopt firm priorities for its
infrastructure spending. It also must attract international
and private-sector investment and look to lower-cost
technologies to begin to close its funding gap. Although
South Sudan loses relatively little to inefficiencies,
redressing those inefficiencies will be vital to creating
solid institutions to attract new investors and get the most
out of their investments. |
---|