The Political Economy of Healthcare Litigation : Model and Empirical Application to Uruguay

The political economy of health care is complex, as stakeholders have conflicting preferences over efficiency and equity. This paper formally models the preferences of consumer and producer groups involved in priority setting and judicialization in...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Corduneanu-Huci, Cristina, Hamilton, Alexander, Masses-Ferrer, Issel
Format: Policy Research Working Paper
Language:English
Published: 2012
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www-wds.worldbank.org/external/default/main?menuPK=64187510&pagePK=64193027&piPK=64187937&theSitePK=523679&menuPK=64187510&searchMenuPK=64187283&siteName=WDS&entityID=000158349_20110929102908
http://hdl.handle.net/10986/3585
id okr-10986-3585
recordtype oai_dc
spelling okr-10986-35852021-04-23T14:02:11Z The Political Economy of Healthcare Litigation : Model and Empirical Application to Uruguay Corduneanu-Huci, Cristina Hamilton, Alexander Masses-Ferrer, Issel ACCESS TO HEALTH CARE ACCESS TO HEALTH SERVICES AGGRESSIVE ALLOCATION OF RESOURCES BUDGET CONSTRAINTS CANCER CANCER PATIENT CITIZENS CONSULTATION PROCESS DEMOCRACY DEVELOPING COUNTRIES DEVELOPMENT POLICY DOCTORS ECONOMIC ANALYSIS ECONOMIC GROWTH ECONOMIC POLICY ECONOMIC RESOURCES ECONOMIC REVIEW EQUAL ACCESS EQUILIBRIUM ESSENTIAL MEDICINES EXCLUSIVE DEALING EXPENDITURES EXTERNALITIES GOVERNMENT AGENCIES HEALTH CARE HEALTH CARE ALLOCATION HEALTH CARE POLICY HEALTH CARE PROVIDERS HEALTH CARE PROVISION HEALTH CARE SYSTEM HEALTH ECONOMICS HEALTH FINANCING HEALTH LAWS HEALTH PLANNING HEALTH POLICY HEALTH PROVIDERS HEALTH RESEARCH HEALTH SERVICE HEALTH SERVICES HEALTH SYSTEM HEALTH SYSTEMS HEALTHCARE HEALTHCARE PROVIDERS HEALTHCARE SERVICES HEALTHCARE SYSTEM HOUSEHOLD SURVEYS HUMAN RIGHTS IMPACT ON HEALTH INCENTIVE STRUCTURES INCOME INDIVIDUAL MEMBERS INFORMATION ASYMMETRIES INSURANCE INSURANCE COMPANIES INSURERS JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS LAWS LOW INCOME MALPRACTICE MARGINAL COST MEDICATION MEDICINES NATIONAL HEALTH NATURE OF HEALTH OBESITY PATIENT CARE PATIENTS PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANIES POLICY DISCUSSIONS POLICY PROCESS POLICY RESEARCH POLICY RESEARCH WORKING PAPER POLITICAL PARTY POLITICAL POWER POLITICAL PROCESS POPULATION SIZE PRIVATE CONSUMPTION PRIVATE SECTOR PROGRESS PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION PUBLIC HEALTH PUBLIC HEALTH CARE PUBLIC HEALTH POLICY PUBLIC HEALTH PROVIDERS PUBLIC HEALTH SYSTEM PUBLIC POLICY PUBLIC SECTOR QUANTITATIVE MEASURES RESOURCE ALLOCATION RESPECT RIGHT TO HEALTH CARE SCARCE RESOURCES SERVICE QUALITY SOCIAL SCIENCE SOCIAL SCIENCES SOCIAL WELFARE TREATMENTS The political economy of health care is complex, as stakeholders have conflicting preferences over efficiency and equity. This paper formally models the preferences of consumer and producer groups involved in priority setting and judicialization in public health care. It uses a unique dataset of stakeholder perceptions, from Uruguay, to test whether these hypotheses are consistent with empirical evidence. The results suggest that the expectations of the political economy literature are supported: 1) regulators of public healthcare are less concerned with efficiency considerations than consumers; and 2) less organized groups are more concerned about equity than more organized interest groups. With respect to the consequences of health litigation, the findings are only partially consistent with the health care governance literature. Consumers perceive litigation as more beneficial than health care providers and regulators do. Counter-intuitively, powerful interest groups seem less willing to use litigation to shape policy outcomes. 2012-03-19T18:05:02Z 2012-03-19T18:05:02Z 2011-09-01 http://www-wds.worldbank.org/external/default/main?menuPK=64187510&pagePK=64193027&piPK=64187937&theSitePK=523679&menuPK=64187510&searchMenuPK=64187283&siteName=WDS&entityID=000158349_20110929102908 http://hdl.handle.net/10986/3585 English Policy Research working paper ; no. WPS 5821 CC BY 3.0 IGO http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo/ World Bank Publications & Research :: Policy Research Working Paper Latin America & Caribbean Latin America & Caribbean South America America Uruguay
repository_type Digital Repository
institution_category Foreign Institution
institution Digital Repositories
building World Bank Open Knowledge Repository
collection World Bank
language English
topic ACCESS TO HEALTH CARE
ACCESS TO HEALTH SERVICES
AGGRESSIVE
ALLOCATION OF RESOURCES
BUDGET CONSTRAINTS
CANCER
CANCER PATIENT
CITIZENS
CONSULTATION PROCESS
DEMOCRACY
DEVELOPING COUNTRIES
DEVELOPMENT POLICY
DOCTORS
ECONOMIC ANALYSIS
ECONOMIC GROWTH
ECONOMIC POLICY
ECONOMIC RESOURCES
ECONOMIC REVIEW
EQUAL ACCESS
EQUILIBRIUM
ESSENTIAL MEDICINES
EXCLUSIVE DEALING
EXPENDITURES
EXTERNALITIES
GOVERNMENT AGENCIES
HEALTH CARE
HEALTH CARE ALLOCATION
HEALTH CARE POLICY
HEALTH CARE PROVIDERS
HEALTH CARE PROVISION
HEALTH CARE SYSTEM
HEALTH ECONOMICS
HEALTH FINANCING
HEALTH LAWS
HEALTH PLANNING
HEALTH POLICY
HEALTH PROVIDERS
HEALTH RESEARCH
HEALTH SERVICE
HEALTH SERVICES
HEALTH SYSTEM
HEALTH SYSTEMS
HEALTHCARE
HEALTHCARE PROVIDERS
HEALTHCARE SERVICES
HEALTHCARE SYSTEM
HOUSEHOLD SURVEYS
HUMAN RIGHTS
IMPACT ON HEALTH
INCENTIVE STRUCTURES
INCOME
INDIVIDUAL MEMBERS
INFORMATION ASYMMETRIES
INSURANCE
INSURANCE COMPANIES
INSURERS
JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
LAWS
LOW INCOME
MALPRACTICE
MARGINAL COST
MEDICATION
MEDICINES
NATIONAL HEALTH
NATURE OF HEALTH
OBESITY
PATIENT CARE
PATIENTS
PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANIES
POLICY DISCUSSIONS
POLICY PROCESS
POLICY RESEARCH
POLICY RESEARCH WORKING PAPER
POLITICAL PARTY
POLITICAL POWER
POLITICAL PROCESS
POPULATION SIZE
PRIVATE CONSUMPTION
PRIVATE SECTOR
PROGRESS
PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION
PUBLIC HEALTH
PUBLIC HEALTH CARE
PUBLIC HEALTH POLICY
PUBLIC HEALTH PROVIDERS
PUBLIC HEALTH SYSTEM
PUBLIC POLICY
PUBLIC SECTOR
QUANTITATIVE MEASURES
RESOURCE ALLOCATION
RESPECT
RIGHT TO HEALTH CARE
SCARCE RESOURCES
SERVICE QUALITY
SOCIAL SCIENCE
SOCIAL SCIENCES
SOCIAL WELFARE
TREATMENTS
spellingShingle ACCESS TO HEALTH CARE
ACCESS TO HEALTH SERVICES
AGGRESSIVE
ALLOCATION OF RESOURCES
BUDGET CONSTRAINTS
CANCER
CANCER PATIENT
CITIZENS
CONSULTATION PROCESS
DEMOCRACY
DEVELOPING COUNTRIES
DEVELOPMENT POLICY
DOCTORS
ECONOMIC ANALYSIS
ECONOMIC GROWTH
ECONOMIC POLICY
ECONOMIC RESOURCES
ECONOMIC REVIEW
EQUAL ACCESS
EQUILIBRIUM
ESSENTIAL MEDICINES
EXCLUSIVE DEALING
EXPENDITURES
EXTERNALITIES
GOVERNMENT AGENCIES
HEALTH CARE
HEALTH CARE ALLOCATION
HEALTH CARE POLICY
HEALTH CARE PROVIDERS
HEALTH CARE PROVISION
HEALTH CARE SYSTEM
HEALTH ECONOMICS
HEALTH FINANCING
HEALTH LAWS
HEALTH PLANNING
HEALTH POLICY
HEALTH PROVIDERS
HEALTH RESEARCH
HEALTH SERVICE
HEALTH SERVICES
HEALTH SYSTEM
HEALTH SYSTEMS
HEALTHCARE
HEALTHCARE PROVIDERS
HEALTHCARE SERVICES
HEALTHCARE SYSTEM
HOUSEHOLD SURVEYS
HUMAN RIGHTS
IMPACT ON HEALTH
INCENTIVE STRUCTURES
INCOME
INDIVIDUAL MEMBERS
INFORMATION ASYMMETRIES
INSURANCE
INSURANCE COMPANIES
INSURERS
JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
LAWS
LOW INCOME
MALPRACTICE
MARGINAL COST
MEDICATION
MEDICINES
NATIONAL HEALTH
NATURE OF HEALTH
OBESITY
PATIENT CARE
PATIENTS
PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANIES
POLICY DISCUSSIONS
POLICY PROCESS
POLICY RESEARCH
POLICY RESEARCH WORKING PAPER
POLITICAL PARTY
POLITICAL POWER
POLITICAL PROCESS
POPULATION SIZE
PRIVATE CONSUMPTION
PRIVATE SECTOR
PROGRESS
PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION
PUBLIC HEALTH
PUBLIC HEALTH CARE
PUBLIC HEALTH POLICY
PUBLIC HEALTH PROVIDERS
PUBLIC HEALTH SYSTEM
PUBLIC POLICY
PUBLIC SECTOR
QUANTITATIVE MEASURES
RESOURCE ALLOCATION
RESPECT
RIGHT TO HEALTH CARE
SCARCE RESOURCES
SERVICE QUALITY
SOCIAL SCIENCE
SOCIAL SCIENCES
SOCIAL WELFARE
TREATMENTS
Corduneanu-Huci, Cristina
Hamilton, Alexander
Masses-Ferrer, Issel
The Political Economy of Healthcare Litigation : Model and Empirical Application to Uruguay
geographic_facet Latin America & Caribbean
Latin America & Caribbean
South America
America
Uruguay
relation Policy Research working paper ; no. WPS 5821
description The political economy of health care is complex, as stakeholders have conflicting preferences over efficiency and equity. This paper formally models the preferences of consumer and producer groups involved in priority setting and judicialization in public health care. It uses a unique dataset of stakeholder perceptions, from Uruguay, to test whether these hypotheses are consistent with empirical evidence. The results suggest that the expectations of the political economy literature are supported: 1) regulators of public healthcare are less concerned with efficiency considerations than consumers; and 2) less organized groups are more concerned about equity than more organized interest groups. With respect to the consequences of health litigation, the findings are only partially consistent with the health care governance literature. Consumers perceive litigation as more beneficial than health care providers and regulators do. Counter-intuitively, powerful interest groups seem less willing to use litigation to shape policy outcomes.
format Publications & Research :: Policy Research Working Paper
author Corduneanu-Huci, Cristina
Hamilton, Alexander
Masses-Ferrer, Issel
author_facet Corduneanu-Huci, Cristina
Hamilton, Alexander
Masses-Ferrer, Issel
author_sort Corduneanu-Huci, Cristina
title The Political Economy of Healthcare Litigation : Model and Empirical Application to Uruguay
title_short The Political Economy of Healthcare Litigation : Model and Empirical Application to Uruguay
title_full The Political Economy of Healthcare Litigation : Model and Empirical Application to Uruguay
title_fullStr The Political Economy of Healthcare Litigation : Model and Empirical Application to Uruguay
title_full_unstemmed The Political Economy of Healthcare Litigation : Model and Empirical Application to Uruguay
title_sort political economy of healthcare litigation : model and empirical application to uruguay
publishDate 2012
url http://www-wds.worldbank.org/external/default/main?menuPK=64187510&pagePK=64193027&piPK=64187937&theSitePK=523679&menuPK=64187510&searchMenuPK=64187283&siteName=WDS&entityID=000158349_20110929102908
http://hdl.handle.net/10986/3585
_version_ 1764387322068992000