Estimating the Impact of Weather on Agriculture

This paper quantifies the significance and magnitude of the effect of measurement error in remote sensing weather data in the analysis of smallholder agricultural productivity. The analysis leverages 17 rounds of nationally-representative, panel...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Michler, Jeffrey D., Josephson, Anna, Kilic, Talip, Murray, Siobhan
Format: Working Paper
Language:English
Published: World Bank, Washington, DC 2021
Subjects:
Online Access:http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/undefined/235241638281693198/Estimating-the-Impact-of-Weather-on-Agriculture
http://hdl.handle.net/10986/36643
id okr-10986-36643
recordtype oai_dc
spelling okr-10986-366432021-12-04T05:10:42Z Estimating the Impact of Weather on Agriculture Michler, Jeffrey D. Josephson, Anna Kilic, Talip Murray, Siobhan REMOTE SENSING AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTIVITY CROP YIELD WEATHER IMPACTS PRECIPITATION TEMPERATURE This paper quantifies the significance and magnitude of the effect of measurement error in remote sensing weather data in the analysis of smallholder agricultural productivity. The analysis leverages 17 rounds of nationally-representative, panel household survey data from six countries in Sub-Saharan Africa. These data are spatially linked with a range of geospatial weather data sources and related metrics. The paper provides systematic evidence on measurement error introduced by (1) different methods used to obfuscate the exact GPS coordinates of households, (2) different metrics used to quantify precipitation and temperature, and (3) different remote sensing measurement technologies. First, the analysis finds no discernible effect of measurement error introduced by different obfuscation methods. Second, it finds that simple weather metrics, such as total seasonal rainfall and mean daily temperature, outperform more complex metrics, such as deviations in rainfall from the long-run average or growing degree days, in a broad range of settings. Finally, the analysis finds substantial amounts of measurement error based on remote sensing products. In extreme cases, the data drawn from different remote sensing products result in opposite signs for coefficients on weather metrics, meaning that precipitation or temperature drawn from one product purportedly increases crop output while the same metrics drawn from a different product purportedly reduces crop output. The paper concludes with a set of six best practices for researchers looking to combine remote sensing weather data with socioeconomic survey data. 2021-12-03T14:44:35Z 2021-12-03T14:44:35Z 2021-11 Working Paper http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/undefined/235241638281693198/Estimating-the-Impact-of-Weather-on-Agriculture http://hdl.handle.net/10986/36643 English Policy Research Working Paper;No. 9867 CC BY 3.0 IGO http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo World Bank World Bank, Washington, DC Publications & Research Publications & Research :: Policy Research Working Paper Africa Sub-Saharan Africa
repository_type Digital Repository
institution_category Foreign Institution
institution Digital Repositories
building World Bank Open Knowledge Repository
collection World Bank
language English
topic REMOTE SENSING
AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTIVITY
CROP YIELD
WEATHER IMPACTS
PRECIPITATION
TEMPERATURE
spellingShingle REMOTE SENSING
AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTIVITY
CROP YIELD
WEATHER IMPACTS
PRECIPITATION
TEMPERATURE
Michler, Jeffrey D.
Josephson, Anna
Kilic, Talip
Murray, Siobhan
Estimating the Impact of Weather on Agriculture
geographic_facet Africa
Sub-Saharan Africa
relation Policy Research Working Paper;No. 9867
description This paper quantifies the significance and magnitude of the effect of measurement error in remote sensing weather data in the analysis of smallholder agricultural productivity. The analysis leverages 17 rounds of nationally-representative, panel household survey data from six countries in Sub-Saharan Africa. These data are spatially linked with a range of geospatial weather data sources and related metrics. The paper provides systematic evidence on measurement error introduced by (1) different methods used to obfuscate the exact GPS coordinates of households, (2) different metrics used to quantify precipitation and temperature, and (3) different remote sensing measurement technologies. First, the analysis finds no discernible effect of measurement error introduced by different obfuscation methods. Second, it finds that simple weather metrics, such as total seasonal rainfall and mean daily temperature, outperform more complex metrics, such as deviations in rainfall from the long-run average or growing degree days, in a broad range of settings. Finally, the analysis finds substantial amounts of measurement error based on remote sensing products. In extreme cases, the data drawn from different remote sensing products result in opposite signs for coefficients on weather metrics, meaning that precipitation or temperature drawn from one product purportedly increases crop output while the same metrics drawn from a different product purportedly reduces crop output. The paper concludes with a set of six best practices for researchers looking to combine remote sensing weather data with socioeconomic survey data.
format Working Paper
author Michler, Jeffrey D.
Josephson, Anna
Kilic, Talip
Murray, Siobhan
author_facet Michler, Jeffrey D.
Josephson, Anna
Kilic, Talip
Murray, Siobhan
author_sort Michler, Jeffrey D.
title Estimating the Impact of Weather on Agriculture
title_short Estimating the Impact of Weather on Agriculture
title_full Estimating the Impact of Weather on Agriculture
title_fullStr Estimating the Impact of Weather on Agriculture
title_full_unstemmed Estimating the Impact of Weather on Agriculture
title_sort estimating the impact of weather on agriculture
publisher World Bank, Washington, DC
publishDate 2021
url http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/undefined/235241638281693198/Estimating-the-Impact-of-Weather-on-Agriculture
http://hdl.handle.net/10986/36643
_version_ 1764485671784808448