Training to Teach Science : Experimental Evidence from Argentina

This paper evaluates the learning impact of different teacher training methods using a randomized controlled trial implemented in 70 state schools in Buenos Aires, Argentina. A control group receiving standard teacher training was compared with two alternative treatment arms: providing a structured...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Albornoz, Facundo, Anauati, María Victoria, Furman, Melina, Luzuriaga, Mariana, Podestá, María Eugenia, Taylor, Inés
Format: Journal Article
Published: Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the World Bank 2021
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10986/36716
id okr-10986-36716
recordtype oai_dc
spelling okr-10986-367162021-12-11T05:10:36Z Training to Teach Science : Experimental Evidence from Argentina Albornoz, Facundo Anauati, María Victoria Furman, Melina Luzuriaga, Mariana Podestá, María Eugenia Taylor, Inés TEACHER TRAINING SCIENCE EDUCATION TEACHER EFFECTIVENESS CURRICULUM SECONDARY EDUCATION This paper evaluates the learning impact of different teacher training methods using a randomized controlled trial implemented in 70 state schools in Buenos Aires, Argentina. A control group receiving standard teacher training was compared with two alternative treatment arms: providing a structured curriculum unit or receiving both the unit and weekly coaching. Following a 12-week intervention, there are substantial learning gains for students whose teachers were trained using structured curriculum units, as well as for those whose teachers received coaching (between 55 percent and 64 percent of a standard deviation more than those students in the control group). Coaching teachers does not appear to be cost-effective, as the unit cost per 0.1 standard deviation is more than twice the cost of using only the structured curriculum unit. However, additional coaching is particularly beneficial for inexperienced teachers with less than two years of teaching science. Coaching teachers also showed specific gains for girls, who both learned and declared to enjoy science lessons more. High-performing students especially benefited from both interventions, with students from coached teachers performing particularly well in harder questions. Using structured curriculum units and providing coaching also affected teacher perceptions: teachers expressed that they enjoyed teaching science more and taught more hours of science, and that their students developed more skills. Results from a follow-up survey suggest persistent change in teacher practice, with the vast majority reporting using the structured curriculum unit one year after the intervention. 2021-12-10T15:10:15Z 2021-12-10T15:10:15Z 2020-06 Journal Article World Bank Economic Review 1564-698X http://hdl.handle.net/10986/36716 CC BY-NC-ND 3.0 IGO http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/igo World Bank Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the World Bank Publications & Research Publications & Research :: Journal Article Latin America & Caribbean Argentina
repository_type Digital Repository
institution_category Foreign Institution
institution Digital Repositories
building World Bank Open Knowledge Repository
collection World Bank
topic TEACHER TRAINING
SCIENCE EDUCATION
TEACHER EFFECTIVENESS
CURRICULUM
SECONDARY EDUCATION
spellingShingle TEACHER TRAINING
SCIENCE EDUCATION
TEACHER EFFECTIVENESS
CURRICULUM
SECONDARY EDUCATION
Albornoz, Facundo
Anauati, María Victoria
Furman, Melina
Luzuriaga, Mariana
Podestá, María Eugenia
Taylor, Inés
Training to Teach Science : Experimental Evidence from Argentina
geographic_facet Latin America & Caribbean
Argentina
description This paper evaluates the learning impact of different teacher training methods using a randomized controlled trial implemented in 70 state schools in Buenos Aires, Argentina. A control group receiving standard teacher training was compared with two alternative treatment arms: providing a structured curriculum unit or receiving both the unit and weekly coaching. Following a 12-week intervention, there are substantial learning gains for students whose teachers were trained using structured curriculum units, as well as for those whose teachers received coaching (between 55 percent and 64 percent of a standard deviation more than those students in the control group). Coaching teachers does not appear to be cost-effective, as the unit cost per 0.1 standard deviation is more than twice the cost of using only the structured curriculum unit. However, additional coaching is particularly beneficial for inexperienced teachers with less than two years of teaching science. Coaching teachers also showed specific gains for girls, who both learned and declared to enjoy science lessons more. High-performing students especially benefited from both interventions, with students from coached teachers performing particularly well in harder questions. Using structured curriculum units and providing coaching also affected teacher perceptions: teachers expressed that they enjoyed teaching science more and taught more hours of science, and that their students developed more skills. Results from a follow-up survey suggest persistent change in teacher practice, with the vast majority reporting using the structured curriculum unit one year after the intervention.
format Journal Article
author Albornoz, Facundo
Anauati, María Victoria
Furman, Melina
Luzuriaga, Mariana
Podestá, María Eugenia
Taylor, Inés
author_facet Albornoz, Facundo
Anauati, María Victoria
Furman, Melina
Luzuriaga, Mariana
Podestá, María Eugenia
Taylor, Inés
author_sort Albornoz, Facundo
title Training to Teach Science : Experimental Evidence from Argentina
title_short Training to Teach Science : Experimental Evidence from Argentina
title_full Training to Teach Science : Experimental Evidence from Argentina
title_fullStr Training to Teach Science : Experimental Evidence from Argentina
title_full_unstemmed Training to Teach Science : Experimental Evidence from Argentina
title_sort training to teach science : experimental evidence from argentina
publisher Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the World Bank
publishDate 2021
url http://hdl.handle.net/10986/36716
_version_ 1764485758942445568