Why OECD Countries Should Reform Rules of Origin

With preferential trade agreements on the rise worldwide rules of origin—which are necessary to prevent trade deflection—are attracting increasing attention. At the same time, preference erosion for Generalized System of Preferences (GSP) recipients is increasing resistance to further multilateral n...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Cadot, Olivier, de Melo, Jaime
Format: Journal Article
Published: World Bank 2012
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10986/4416
id okr-10986-4416
recordtype oai_dc
spelling okr-10986-44162021-04-23T14:02:17Z Why OECD Countries Should Reform Rules of Origin Cadot, Olivier de Melo, Jaime customs unions export protection external tariff external tariffs free trade free trade agreements intermediate goods market access multilateral negotiations preferential access preferential trade preferential trade agreements regionalism rules of origin tariff revenue trade deflection trade facilitation world trade world trade organization world trading system With preferential trade agreements on the rise worldwide rules of origin—which are necessary to prevent trade deflection—are attracting increasing attention. At the same time, preference erosion for Generalized System of Preferences (GSP) recipients is increasing resistance to further multilateral negotiations. Drawing on different approaches, this article shows that the current system of rules of origin that is used by the European Union and the United States in preferential trade agreements (including the GSP) and that is similar to systems used by other Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development countries should be drastically simplified if developed economies really want to help developing economies integrate into the world trading system. In addition to diverting resources for administrative tasks, current rules of origin carry significant compliance costs. More fundamentally, it is becoming increasingly clear that they are often been designed to force developing economies to buy inefficient intermediate products from developed economies to "pay for" preferential access for the final product. The evidence also suggests that a significant share of the rents associated with market access (net of rules of origin compliance costs) is captured by developed economies. Finally, the restrictiveness of rules of origin is found to be beyond the levels that would be justified to prevent trade deflection, suggesting a capture by special interest groups. The article outlines some alternative paths to reforms. 2012-03-30T07:12:33Z 2012-03-30T07:12:33Z 2008-03-01 Journal Article World Bank Research Observer 1564-6971 http://hdl.handle.net/10986/4416 CC BY-NC-ND 3.0 IGO http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/igo/ World Bank World Bank Journal Article Uruguay Tunisia
repository_type Digital Repository
institution_category Foreign Institution
institution Digital Repositories
building World Bank Open Knowledge Repository
collection World Bank
topic customs unions
export protection
external tariff
external tariffs
free trade
free trade agreements
intermediate goods
market access
multilateral negotiations
preferential access
preferential trade
preferential trade agreements
regionalism
rules of origin
tariff revenue
trade deflection
trade facilitation
world trade
world trade organization
world trading system
spellingShingle customs unions
export protection
external tariff
external tariffs
free trade
free trade agreements
intermediate goods
market access
multilateral negotiations
preferential access
preferential trade
preferential trade agreements
regionalism
rules of origin
tariff revenue
trade deflection
trade facilitation
world trade
world trade organization
world trading system
Cadot, Olivier
de Melo, Jaime
Why OECD Countries Should Reform Rules of Origin
geographic_facet Uruguay
Tunisia
description With preferential trade agreements on the rise worldwide rules of origin—which are necessary to prevent trade deflection—are attracting increasing attention. At the same time, preference erosion for Generalized System of Preferences (GSP) recipients is increasing resistance to further multilateral negotiations. Drawing on different approaches, this article shows that the current system of rules of origin that is used by the European Union and the United States in preferential trade agreements (including the GSP) and that is similar to systems used by other Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development countries should be drastically simplified if developed economies really want to help developing economies integrate into the world trading system. In addition to diverting resources for administrative tasks, current rules of origin carry significant compliance costs. More fundamentally, it is becoming increasingly clear that they are often been designed to force developing economies to buy inefficient intermediate products from developed economies to "pay for" preferential access for the final product. The evidence also suggests that a significant share of the rents associated with market access (net of rules of origin compliance costs) is captured by developed economies. Finally, the restrictiveness of rules of origin is found to be beyond the levels that would be justified to prevent trade deflection, suggesting a capture by special interest groups. The article outlines some alternative paths to reforms.
format Journal Article
author Cadot, Olivier
de Melo, Jaime
author_facet Cadot, Olivier
de Melo, Jaime
author_sort Cadot, Olivier
title Why OECD Countries Should Reform Rules of Origin
title_short Why OECD Countries Should Reform Rules of Origin
title_full Why OECD Countries Should Reform Rules of Origin
title_fullStr Why OECD Countries Should Reform Rules of Origin
title_full_unstemmed Why OECD Countries Should Reform Rules of Origin
title_sort why oecd countries should reform rules of origin
publisher World Bank
publishDate 2012
url http://hdl.handle.net/10986/4416
_version_ 1764391265662664704