Evaluation : Why, for Whom and How?
The overall objective of this article is to discuss current theoretical debates in the evaluation literature to assess their relevance for agriculture. After noting the 'bad press' of monitoring and evaluation (M&E) in agriculture, the literature is selectively reviewed to see what lig...
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Journal Article |
| Language: | EN |
| Published: |
2012
|
| Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/10986/5276 |
| id |
okr-10986-5276 |
|---|---|
| recordtype |
oai_dc |
| spelling |
okr-10986-52762021-04-23T14:02:21Z Evaluation : Why, for Whom and How? Lucas, H. Longhurst, R. The overall objective of this article is to discuss current theoretical debates in the evaluation literature to assess their relevance for agriculture. After noting the 'bad press' of monitoring and evaluation (M&E) in agriculture, the literature is selectively reviewed to see what light is shed from different evaluation paradigms and methodologies. Experiences in the health sector are then examined in greater depth, emphasising debates around randomised controlled trials (RCTs). The final section considers some possible ways forward. 2012-03-30T07:32:05Z 2012-03-30T07:32:05Z 2010 Journal Article Ids Bulletin-Institute of Development Studies 0265-5012 http://hdl.handle.net/10986/5276 EN http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/igo World Bank Journal Article |
| repository_type |
Digital Repository |
| institution_category |
Foreign Institution |
| institution |
Digital Repositories |
| building |
World Bank Open Knowledge Repository |
| collection |
World Bank |
| language |
EN |
| relation |
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/igo |
| description |
The overall objective of this article is to discuss current theoretical debates in the evaluation literature to assess their relevance for agriculture. After noting the 'bad press' of monitoring and evaluation (M&E) in agriculture, the literature is selectively reviewed to see what light is shed from different evaluation paradigms and methodologies. Experiences in the health sector are then examined in greater depth, emphasising debates around randomised controlled trials (RCTs). The final section considers some possible ways forward. |
| format |
Journal Article |
| author |
Lucas, H. Longhurst, R. |
| spellingShingle |
Lucas, H. Longhurst, R. Evaluation : Why, for Whom and How? |
| author_facet |
Lucas, H. Longhurst, R. |
| author_sort |
Lucas, H. |
| title |
Evaluation : Why, for Whom and How? |
| title_short |
Evaluation : Why, for Whom and How? |
| title_full |
Evaluation : Why, for Whom and How? |
| title_fullStr |
Evaluation : Why, for Whom and How? |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Evaluation : Why, for Whom and How? |
| title_sort |
evaluation : why, for whom and how? |
| publishDate |
2012 |
| url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10986/5276 |
| _version_ |
1764394525228269568 |