(Un)bundling Infrastructure Procurement: Evidence from Water Supply and Sewage Projects

Public infrastructure has long been faced with difficulty in financing. Available public resources are often limited in many countries. Competitive bidding in public procurement systems is an important instrument to contain the public investment costs. But competition is often limited in the infrast...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Estache, Antonio, Iimi, Atsushi
Format: Journal Article
Language:EN
Published: 2012
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10986/5701
id okr-10986-5701
recordtype oai_dc
spelling okr-10986-57012021-04-23T14:02:23Z (Un)bundling Infrastructure Procurement: Evidence from Water Supply and Sewage Projects Estache, Antonio Iimi, Atsushi Production Cost Capital, Total Factor, and Multifactor Productivity Capacity D240 National Government Expenditures and Related Policies: Infrastructures Other Public Investment and Capital Stock H540 Production, Pricing, and Market Structure Size Distribution of Firms L110 Renewable Resources and Conservation: Water Q250 Air Pollution Water Pollution Noise Hazardous Waste Solid Waste Recycling Q530 Public infrastructure has long been faced with difficulty in financing. Available public resources are often limited in many countries. Competitive bidding in public procurement systems is an important instrument to contain the public investment costs. But competition is often limited in the infrastructure sector. In such circumstances, better public procurement design can save a lot of public resources. There is a general tradeoff between the competition effect and economies of scale and scope; large contracts can benefit from the scale and scope effects but have to compromise competition. The unbundling approach can foster competition but may suffer from diseconomies of scale and scope. Using procurement data from water supply and sewage projects in developing countries, the paper analyzes the effects of the (un)bundling strategy on bidders' entry and bidding behavior. It shows that the bidder cost structure exhibits significant diseconomies of scope between two main public works in this sector, i.e., treatment plant construction and distribution network installation. There is no clear evidence of the competition effect. Therefore, there is no rationale of bundling these two works into a single contract. Unbundling can help governments to contain public infrastructure costs. 2012-03-30T07:34:07Z 2012-03-30T07:34:07Z 2011 Journal Article Utilities Policy 09571787 http://hdl.handle.net/10986/5701 EN http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/igo 3922 World Bank Journal Article
repository_type Digital Repository
institution_category Foreign Institution
institution Digital Repositories
building World Bank Open Knowledge Repository
collection World Bank
language EN
topic Production
Cost
Capital, Total Factor, and Multifactor Productivity
Capacity D240
National Government Expenditures and Related Policies: Infrastructures
Other Public Investment and Capital Stock H540
Production, Pricing, and Market Structure
Size Distribution of Firms L110
Renewable Resources and Conservation: Water Q250
Air Pollution
Water Pollution
Noise
Hazardous Waste
Solid Waste
Recycling Q530
spellingShingle Production
Cost
Capital, Total Factor, and Multifactor Productivity
Capacity D240
National Government Expenditures and Related Policies: Infrastructures
Other Public Investment and Capital Stock H540
Production, Pricing, and Market Structure
Size Distribution of Firms L110
Renewable Resources and Conservation: Water Q250
Air Pollution
Water Pollution
Noise
Hazardous Waste
Solid Waste
Recycling Q530
Estache, Antonio
Iimi, Atsushi
(Un)bundling Infrastructure Procurement: Evidence from Water Supply and Sewage Projects
relation http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/igo
description Public infrastructure has long been faced with difficulty in financing. Available public resources are often limited in many countries. Competitive bidding in public procurement systems is an important instrument to contain the public investment costs. But competition is often limited in the infrastructure sector. In such circumstances, better public procurement design can save a lot of public resources. There is a general tradeoff between the competition effect and economies of scale and scope; large contracts can benefit from the scale and scope effects but have to compromise competition. The unbundling approach can foster competition but may suffer from diseconomies of scale and scope. Using procurement data from water supply and sewage projects in developing countries, the paper analyzes the effects of the (un)bundling strategy on bidders' entry and bidding behavior. It shows that the bidder cost structure exhibits significant diseconomies of scope between two main public works in this sector, i.e., treatment plant construction and distribution network installation. There is no clear evidence of the competition effect. Therefore, there is no rationale of bundling these two works into a single contract. Unbundling can help governments to contain public infrastructure costs.
format Journal Article
author Estache, Antonio
Iimi, Atsushi
author_facet Estache, Antonio
Iimi, Atsushi
author_sort Estache, Antonio
title (Un)bundling Infrastructure Procurement: Evidence from Water Supply and Sewage Projects
title_short (Un)bundling Infrastructure Procurement: Evidence from Water Supply and Sewage Projects
title_full (Un)bundling Infrastructure Procurement: Evidence from Water Supply and Sewage Projects
title_fullStr (Un)bundling Infrastructure Procurement: Evidence from Water Supply and Sewage Projects
title_full_unstemmed (Un)bundling Infrastructure Procurement: Evidence from Water Supply and Sewage Projects
title_sort (un)bundling infrastructure procurement: evidence from water supply and sewage projects
publishDate 2012
url http://hdl.handle.net/10986/5701
_version_ 1764396007804633088