Insurance, Credit, and Technology Adoption : Field Experimental Evidence from Malawi

Does production risk suppress the demand for credit? We implemented a randomized field experiment to ask whether provision of insurance against a major source of production risk induces farmers to take out loans to adopt a new crop technology. The study sample was composed of roughly 800 maize and g...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Gine, Xavier, Yang, Dean
Format: Journal Article
Language:EN
Published: 2012
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10986/5782
id okr-10986-5782
recordtype oai_dc
spelling okr-10986-57822021-04-23T14:02:23Z Insurance, Credit, and Technology Adoption : Field Experimental Evidence from Malawi Gine, Xavier Yang, Dean Insurance Insurance Companies G220 Economic Development: Agriculture Natural Resources Energy Environment Other Primary Products O130 Technological Change: Choices and Consequences Diffusion Processes O330 Micro Analysis of Farm Firms, Farm Households, and Farm Input Markets Q120 Agricultural Finance Q140 Agricultural Policy Food Policy Q180 Microdata Set Does production risk suppress the demand for credit? We implemented a randomized field experiment to ask whether provision of insurance against a major source of production risk induces farmers to take out loans to adopt a new crop technology. The study sample was composed of roughly 800 maize and groundnut farmers in Malawi, where by far the dominant source of production risk is the level of rainfall. We randomly selected half of the farmers to be offered credit to purchase high-yielding hybrid maize and groundnut seeds for planting in the November 2006 crop season. The other half of farmers were offered a similar credit package, but were also required to purchase (at actuarially fair rates) a weather insurance policy that partially or fully forgave the loan in the event of poor rainfall. Surprisingly, take-up was lower by 13 percentage points among farmers offered insurance with the loan. Take-up was 33.0% for farmers who were offered the uninsured loan. There is suggestive evidence that reduced take-up of the insured loan was due to farmers already having implicit insurance from the limited liability clause in the loan contract: insured loan take-up was positively correlated with farmer education, income, and wealth, which may proxy for the individual's default costs. By contrast, take-up of the uninsured loan was uncorrelated with these farmer characteristics. 2012-03-30T07:34:31Z 2012-03-30T07:34:31Z 2009 Journal Article Journal of Development Economics 03043878 http://hdl.handle.net/10986/5782 EN CC BY-NC-ND 3.0 IGO http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/igo World Bank Journal Article Malawi
repository_type Digital Repository
institution_category Foreign Institution
institution Digital Repositories
building World Bank Open Knowledge Repository
collection World Bank
language EN
topic Insurance
Insurance Companies G220
Economic Development: Agriculture
Natural Resources
Energy
Environment
Other Primary Products O130
Technological Change: Choices and Consequences
Diffusion Processes O330
Micro Analysis of Farm Firms, Farm Households, and Farm Input Markets Q120
Agricultural Finance Q140
Agricultural Policy
Food Policy Q180
Microdata Set
spellingShingle Insurance
Insurance Companies G220
Economic Development: Agriculture
Natural Resources
Energy
Environment
Other Primary Products O130
Technological Change: Choices and Consequences
Diffusion Processes O330
Micro Analysis of Farm Firms, Farm Households, and Farm Input Markets Q120
Agricultural Finance Q140
Agricultural Policy
Food Policy Q180
Microdata Set
Gine, Xavier
Yang, Dean
Insurance, Credit, and Technology Adoption : Field Experimental Evidence from Malawi
geographic_facet Malawi
description Does production risk suppress the demand for credit? We implemented a randomized field experiment to ask whether provision of insurance against a major source of production risk induces farmers to take out loans to adopt a new crop technology. The study sample was composed of roughly 800 maize and groundnut farmers in Malawi, where by far the dominant source of production risk is the level of rainfall. We randomly selected half of the farmers to be offered credit to purchase high-yielding hybrid maize and groundnut seeds for planting in the November 2006 crop season. The other half of farmers were offered a similar credit package, but were also required to purchase (at actuarially fair rates) a weather insurance policy that partially or fully forgave the loan in the event of poor rainfall. Surprisingly, take-up was lower by 13 percentage points among farmers offered insurance with the loan. Take-up was 33.0% for farmers who were offered the uninsured loan. There is suggestive evidence that reduced take-up of the insured loan was due to farmers already having implicit insurance from the limited liability clause in the loan contract: insured loan take-up was positively correlated with farmer education, income, and wealth, which may proxy for the individual's default costs. By contrast, take-up of the uninsured loan was uncorrelated with these farmer characteristics.
format Journal Article
author Gine, Xavier
Yang, Dean
author_facet Gine, Xavier
Yang, Dean
author_sort Gine, Xavier
title Insurance, Credit, and Technology Adoption : Field Experimental Evidence from Malawi
title_short Insurance, Credit, and Technology Adoption : Field Experimental Evidence from Malawi
title_full Insurance, Credit, and Technology Adoption : Field Experimental Evidence from Malawi
title_fullStr Insurance, Credit, and Technology Adoption : Field Experimental Evidence from Malawi
title_full_unstemmed Insurance, Credit, and Technology Adoption : Field Experimental Evidence from Malawi
title_sort insurance, credit, and technology adoption : field experimental evidence from malawi
publishDate 2012
url http://hdl.handle.net/10986/5782
_version_ 1764396275478822912