Response to 'What Do the Worldwide Governance Indicators Measure?'

Thomas (2009) dismisses the Worldwide Governance Indicators (WGI) as an 'elaborate and unsupported hypothesis' because of the failure to demonstrate the 'construct validity' of these indicators. We argue that 'construct validity' is not a useful tool to assess the merit...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kaufmann, Daniel, Kraay, Aart, Mastruzzi, Massimo
Format: Journal Article
Language:EN
Published: 2012
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10986/5897
id okr-10986-5897
recordtype oai_dc
spelling okr-10986-58972021-04-23T14:02:23Z Response to 'What Do the Worldwide Governance Indicators Measure?' Kaufmann, Daniel Kraay, Aart Mastruzzi, Massimo Index Numbers and Aggregation leading indicators C430 Models of Political Processes: Rent-seeking, Elections, Legislatures, and Voting Behavior D720 Structure, Scope, and Performance of Government H110 Formal and Informal Sectors Shadow Economy Institutional Arrangements O170 Thomas (2009) dismisses the Worldwide Governance Indicators (WGI) as an 'elaborate and unsupported hypothesis' because of the failure to demonstrate the 'construct validity' of these indicators. We argue that 'construct validity' is not a useful tool to assess the merits of the WGI, and even if it were, Thomas provides no evidence of any practical consequences of failure to meet the criteria of construct validity. 2012-03-30T07:35:04Z 2012-03-30T07:35:04Z 2010 Journal Article European Journal of Development Research 09578811 http://hdl.handle.net/10986/5897 EN http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/igo World Bank Journal Article
repository_type Digital Repository
institution_category Foreign Institution
institution Digital Repositories
building World Bank Open Knowledge Repository
collection World Bank
language EN
topic Index Numbers and Aggregation
leading indicators C430
Models of Political Processes: Rent-seeking, Elections, Legislatures, and Voting Behavior D720
Structure, Scope, and Performance of Government H110
Formal and Informal Sectors
Shadow Economy
Institutional Arrangements O170
spellingShingle Index Numbers and Aggregation
leading indicators C430
Models of Political Processes: Rent-seeking, Elections, Legislatures, and Voting Behavior D720
Structure, Scope, and Performance of Government H110
Formal and Informal Sectors
Shadow Economy
Institutional Arrangements O170
Kaufmann, Daniel
Kraay, Aart
Mastruzzi, Massimo
Response to 'What Do the Worldwide Governance Indicators Measure?'
relation http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/igo
description Thomas (2009) dismisses the Worldwide Governance Indicators (WGI) as an 'elaborate and unsupported hypothesis' because of the failure to demonstrate the 'construct validity' of these indicators. We argue that 'construct validity' is not a useful tool to assess the merits of the WGI, and even if it were, Thomas provides no evidence of any practical consequences of failure to meet the criteria of construct validity.
format Journal Article
author Kaufmann, Daniel
Kraay, Aart
Mastruzzi, Massimo
author_facet Kaufmann, Daniel
Kraay, Aart
Mastruzzi, Massimo
author_sort Kaufmann, Daniel
title Response to 'What Do the Worldwide Governance Indicators Measure?'
title_short Response to 'What Do the Worldwide Governance Indicators Measure?'
title_full Response to 'What Do the Worldwide Governance Indicators Measure?'
title_fullStr Response to 'What Do the Worldwide Governance Indicators Measure?'
title_full_unstemmed Response to 'What Do the Worldwide Governance Indicators Measure?'
title_sort response to 'what do the worldwide governance indicators measure?'
publishDate 2012
url http://hdl.handle.net/10986/5897
_version_ 1764396700419489792