Equality of Opportunities and Fiscal Incidence in Cote d'Ivoire
This study analyzes opportunities for children in Cote d'Ivoire, where opportunities refer to access to basic services and goods that improve the likelihood of a child maximizing his or her human potential. The principle that guides this analy...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Policy Research Working Paper |
Language: | English |
Published: |
World Bank, Washington, DC
2012
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2012/04/16237531/equality-opportunities-fiscal-incidence-cote-divoire-equality-opportunities-fiscal-incidence-cote-divoire http://hdl.handle.net/10986/6051 |
Summary: | This study analyzes opportunities for
children in Cote d'Ivoire, where opportunities refer to
access to basic services and goods that improve the
likelihood of a child maximizing his or her human potential.
The principle that guides this analysis is one of equality
of opportunity, which is that a child's circumstances
at birth should not determine his or her access to
opportunities. The analysis computes the Human Opportunity
Index, which measures the extent to which access to basic
services is universal and evenly distributed among children
of different circumstances. Opportunities are limited in
Cote d'Ivoire, despite some improvements in access to
electricity and timely access to primary education.
Otherwise, trends on access remain stagnant. Scale effects
(variations across the board) are behind these trends, with
little improvement observed from equalizing interventions.
Circumstances such as region and household head
characteristics affect a child's access to
opportunities, while household incomes and a child's
gender and ethnicity play a relatively small role in access
differentials. Public spending on education opportunities is
shown to be regressive and pro-rich, especially when
analyzed across the distribution of circumstances rather
than acroos income level.The groups of children that are
particularly behind in terms of educational opportunities
are those whose household heads lack primary education and
reside in rural areas. Closing the enrollment gap of these
children should be a priority for targeted educational
interventions. However, improving opportunities may require
more than a single type of intervention: opportunities with
low coverage may need to be scaled up, while those with
large inequalities of access may require equalizing interventions. |
---|