Transportation Fuel Use, Technology and Standards : The Role of Credibility and Expectations
There is a debate among policy analysts about whether fuel taxes alone are the most effective policy to reduce fuel use by motorists, or whether to also use mandatory standards for fuel efficiency. A problem with a policy mandating fuel economy sta...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Policy Research Working Paper |
Language: | English |
Published: |
World Bank, Washington, DC
2012
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2008/08/9778611/transportation-fuel-use-technology-standards-role-credibility-expectations http://hdl.handle.net/10986/6793 |
Summary: | There is a debate among policy analysts
about whether fuel taxes alone are the most effective policy
to reduce fuel use by motorists, or whether to also use
mandatory standards for fuel efficiency. A problem with a
policy mandating fuel economy standards is the "rebound
effect," whereby owners with more efficient vehicles
increase vehicle usage. If an important part of negative
externalities from transport are associated with vehicle
kilometers (accidents, congestion, road wear) rather than
fuel consumption, the rebound effect increases negative
externalities. Taxes and standards should be mutually
supportive because fuel taxes often meet political
resistance. Over time, fuel efficiency standards can reduce
political resistance to fuel taxes. Thus, by raising fuel
efficiency standards now, politicians may be able to pursue
higher fuel tax paths in the future. Another argument in
support of fuel efficiency standards and similar policies is
that standards to a greater extent than taxes can be
announced in advance and still be credible and change the
behavior of inventors, firms, and other agents in society. A
further argument is that standards can be used with greater
force and commitment through international coordination. |
---|