Public Transport Subsidies and Affordability in Mumbai, India
This paper describes the role of public transport and the nature and incidence of transport subsidies in Mumbai, India. Mumbai has an extensive rail and bus network, and public transport is used for over 75 percent of all motorized trips in Greate...
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Policy Research Working Paper |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
World Bank, Washington, DC
2012
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2007/11/8683737/public-transport-subsidies-affordability-mumbai-india http://hdl.handle.net/10986/7522 |
| id |
okr-10986-7522 |
|---|---|
| recordtype |
oai_dc |
| repository_type |
Digital Repository |
| institution_category |
Foreign Institution |
| institution |
Digital Repositories |
| building |
World Bank Open Knowledge Repository |
| collection |
World Bank |
| language |
English |
| topic |
ACCIDENTS ACCOUNTING AIR ARTERIAL ROADS AVERAGE SPEED AVERAGE SPEED OF BUSES BALANCE SHEET BANK LOAN BENEFICIARIES BORROWING BUS BUS FARE BUS FARES BUS LANES BUS NETWORK BUS RIDERS BUS SERVICE BUS SERVICES BUS SUBSIDY BUS SYSTEM BUS USE BUS USERS BUSES CALCULATION CALCULATIONS CAPITAL INVESTMENT CAR CAR USAGE CARRIAGES CARS COMMUTE TRIP COMMUTER RAIL COMMUTER RAIL SERVICES COMMUTERS COMMUTING COST OF TRAVEL DEPRECIATION DEVELOPMENT BANK EARNINGS ELASTICITY ENGINES FARE BUS FARE INCREASE FARE INCREASES FARE STRUCTURE FARES INCREASES FAST TRAINS FLOOR SPACE FUEL HEADWAY HOURS OF OPERATION HOUSEHOLD BUDGETS HOUSEHOLD EXPENDITURE HOUSEHOLD EXPENDITURE ON TRANSPORT HOUSEHOLD INCOME HOUSEHOLD TRIPS IN TERMS OF DISTANCE INCOME INCOME GROUP INCOME GROUPS INCOME RANGE INCOMES JOURNEY JOURNEY TO WORK LONG DISTANCES MASS TRANSIT MODAL SHARE MODAL SHARES MONTHLY INCOME MOTOR CYCLE MOTOR VEHICLE MOTOR VEHICLE EMISSIONS MOTORCYCLE MOTORCYCLES MOTORIZED TRANSPORT PASSENGER PASSENGER KILOMETERS PASSENGER REVENUES PASSENGER VOLUME PASSENGER VOLUMES PASSENGERS PASSENGERS DAILY PASSENGERS PER DAY PEAK HOURS PRICE ELASTICITIES PRIVATE VEHICLES PUBLIC TRANSIT PUBLIC TRANSPORT PUBLIC TRANSPORT AFFORDABILITY PUBLIC TRANSPORT SUBSIDIES PUBLIC TRANSPORT SYSTEM QUESTIONNAIRE RAIL RAIL BUS RAIL EXPENDITURES RAIL FARES RAIL LINES RAIL NETWORKS RAIL OPERATIONS RAIL RAIL RAIL RIDERS RAIL SERVICE RAIL SERVICES RAIL STATIONS RAIL SUBSIDIES RAIL SYSTEM RAIL TRAVEL RAILWAY RAILWAY LINE RAILWAY SECTOR RAILWAY STATIONS RAILWAY SYSTEM RAILWAYS RAPID GROWTH REGIONAL PLANNING RIDERSHIP ROLLING STOCK ROUTE ROUTES SCHOOL BUS SCHOOL TRIPS SOCIAL SERVICES STANDING PASSENGERS SUBURBAN RAIL SUBURBAN RAIL NETWORK SUBURBAN RAILWAYS SUBURBAN TRAINS SUBURBS TAXIS TOTAL COST TOTAL COSTS TOTAL TRIPS TRAINS TRANSIT SUBSIDIES TRANSIT SUBSIDY TRANSPORT AFFORDABILITY TRANSPORT MANAGEMENT TRANSPORT MODE TRANSPORT NETWORK TRANSPORT OPERATIONS TRANSPORT SECTOR TRANSPORTATION TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING TRAVEL BEHAVIOR TRAVEL MODE TRAVEL PATTERNS TRIP PURPOSE TRIPS TRIPS BY MODE URBAN TRANSPORT URBAN TRANSPORTATION VEHICLE WAGE WALKING WORK TRIPS |
| spellingShingle |
ACCIDENTS ACCOUNTING AIR ARTERIAL ROADS AVERAGE SPEED AVERAGE SPEED OF BUSES BALANCE SHEET BANK LOAN BENEFICIARIES BORROWING BUS BUS FARE BUS FARES BUS LANES BUS NETWORK BUS RIDERS BUS SERVICE BUS SERVICES BUS SUBSIDY BUS SYSTEM BUS USE BUS USERS BUSES CALCULATION CALCULATIONS CAPITAL INVESTMENT CAR CAR USAGE CARRIAGES CARS COMMUTE TRIP COMMUTER RAIL COMMUTER RAIL SERVICES COMMUTERS COMMUTING COST OF TRAVEL DEPRECIATION DEVELOPMENT BANK EARNINGS ELASTICITY ENGINES FARE BUS FARE INCREASE FARE INCREASES FARE STRUCTURE FARES INCREASES FAST TRAINS FLOOR SPACE FUEL HEADWAY HOURS OF OPERATION HOUSEHOLD BUDGETS HOUSEHOLD EXPENDITURE HOUSEHOLD EXPENDITURE ON TRANSPORT HOUSEHOLD INCOME HOUSEHOLD TRIPS IN TERMS OF DISTANCE INCOME INCOME GROUP INCOME GROUPS INCOME RANGE INCOMES JOURNEY JOURNEY TO WORK LONG DISTANCES MASS TRANSIT MODAL SHARE MODAL SHARES MONTHLY INCOME MOTOR CYCLE MOTOR VEHICLE MOTOR VEHICLE EMISSIONS MOTORCYCLE MOTORCYCLES MOTORIZED TRANSPORT PASSENGER PASSENGER KILOMETERS PASSENGER REVENUES PASSENGER VOLUME PASSENGER VOLUMES PASSENGERS PASSENGERS DAILY PASSENGERS PER DAY PEAK HOURS PRICE ELASTICITIES PRIVATE VEHICLES PUBLIC TRANSIT PUBLIC TRANSPORT PUBLIC TRANSPORT AFFORDABILITY PUBLIC TRANSPORT SUBSIDIES PUBLIC TRANSPORT SYSTEM QUESTIONNAIRE RAIL RAIL BUS RAIL EXPENDITURES RAIL FARES RAIL LINES RAIL NETWORKS RAIL OPERATIONS RAIL RAIL RAIL RIDERS RAIL SERVICE RAIL SERVICES RAIL STATIONS RAIL SUBSIDIES RAIL SYSTEM RAIL TRAVEL RAILWAY RAILWAY LINE RAILWAY SECTOR RAILWAY STATIONS RAILWAY SYSTEM RAILWAYS RAPID GROWTH REGIONAL PLANNING RIDERSHIP ROLLING STOCK ROUTE ROUTES SCHOOL BUS SCHOOL TRIPS SOCIAL SERVICES STANDING PASSENGERS SUBURBAN RAIL SUBURBAN RAIL NETWORK SUBURBAN RAILWAYS SUBURBAN TRAINS SUBURBS TAXIS TOTAL COST TOTAL COSTS TOTAL TRIPS TRAINS TRANSIT SUBSIDIES TRANSIT SUBSIDY TRANSPORT AFFORDABILITY TRANSPORT MANAGEMENT TRANSPORT MODE TRANSPORT NETWORK TRANSPORT OPERATIONS TRANSPORT SECTOR TRANSPORTATION TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING TRAVEL BEHAVIOR TRAVEL MODE TRAVEL PATTERNS TRIP PURPOSE TRIPS TRIPS BY MODE URBAN TRANSPORT URBAN TRANSPORTATION VEHICLE WAGE WALKING WORK TRIPS Cropper, Maureen Bhattacharya, Soma Public Transport Subsidies and Affordability in Mumbai, India |
| geographic_facet |
South Asia India |
| relation |
Policy Research Working Paper; No. 4395 |
| description |
This paper describes the role of public
transport and the nature and incidence of transport
subsidies in Mumbai, India. Mumbai has an extensive rail
and bus network, and public transport is used for over 75
percent of all motorized trips in Greater Mumbai. Both rail
and bus fares in Mumbai are subsidized: BEST, which
operates public buses in Mumbai, is also an electric
utility, and subsidizes bus fares from electricity revenues.
We analyze the incidence of these subsidies, and their
effect on mode choice, using data from a survey of
households in Greater Mumbai. In Mumbai, as in many cities,
the middle class is more likely to use public transport for
travel than the poor. The poor, however, also use public
transit, and their expenditure on public transit
constitutes, on average, a larger share of their income than
it does for the middle class. It is, therefore, the case
that the poor benefit from transit subsidies in Mumbai, as
well as the middle and upper-middle classes; however, the
poorest 27 percent of the population receives only 19
percent of bus subsidies and 15.5 percent of rail subsidies.
Indeed, 26 percent of the lowest income households surveyed
do not use rail, while 10 percent do not use bus, implying
that they receive no transit subsidies. Expenditure on
transport accounts for 16 percent of income in the lowest
income category (<5000 Rs./month), with 10 percent of
income, on average, spent on bus and rail fares. This
percentage, however, is not evenly distributed: it is much
higher than 10 percent for households in which workers take
the bus or train to work, and lower for households in which
the main earner walks to work. Even in these households,
however, 12.5 percent of income is spent on transportation.
Expenditure on public transport would be even higher if bus
fares in Mumbai were not subsidized. In 2005-2006,
transport revenues of BEST fell below total costs by 30
percent and below operating costs by 20 percent. Rail fares,
which are much lower than bus fares per km traveled,
officially covered operating costs and almost covered
depreciation expenses. |
| format |
Publications & Research :: Policy Research Working Paper |
| author |
Cropper, Maureen Bhattacharya, Soma |
| author_facet |
Cropper, Maureen Bhattacharya, Soma |
| author_sort |
Cropper, Maureen |
| title |
Public Transport Subsidies and Affordability in Mumbai, India |
| title_short |
Public Transport Subsidies and Affordability in Mumbai, India |
| title_full |
Public Transport Subsidies and Affordability in Mumbai, India |
| title_fullStr |
Public Transport Subsidies and Affordability in Mumbai, India |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Public Transport Subsidies and Affordability in Mumbai, India |
| title_sort |
public transport subsidies and affordability in mumbai, india |
| publisher |
World Bank, Washington, DC |
| publishDate |
2012 |
| url |
http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2007/11/8683737/public-transport-subsidies-affordability-mumbai-india http://hdl.handle.net/10986/7522 |
| _version_ |
1764402461782573056 |
| spelling |
okr-10986-75222021-04-23T14:02:34Z Public Transport Subsidies and Affordability in Mumbai, India Cropper, Maureen Bhattacharya, Soma ACCIDENTS ACCOUNTING AIR ARTERIAL ROADS AVERAGE SPEED AVERAGE SPEED OF BUSES BALANCE SHEET BANK LOAN BENEFICIARIES BORROWING BUS BUS FARE BUS FARES BUS LANES BUS NETWORK BUS RIDERS BUS SERVICE BUS SERVICES BUS SUBSIDY BUS SYSTEM BUS USE BUS USERS BUSES CALCULATION CALCULATIONS CAPITAL INVESTMENT CAR CAR USAGE CARRIAGES CARS COMMUTE TRIP COMMUTER RAIL COMMUTER RAIL SERVICES COMMUTERS COMMUTING COST OF TRAVEL DEPRECIATION DEVELOPMENT BANK EARNINGS ELASTICITY ENGINES FARE BUS FARE INCREASE FARE INCREASES FARE STRUCTURE FARES INCREASES FAST TRAINS FLOOR SPACE FUEL HEADWAY HOURS OF OPERATION HOUSEHOLD BUDGETS HOUSEHOLD EXPENDITURE HOUSEHOLD EXPENDITURE ON TRANSPORT HOUSEHOLD INCOME HOUSEHOLD TRIPS IN TERMS OF DISTANCE INCOME INCOME GROUP INCOME GROUPS INCOME RANGE INCOMES JOURNEY JOURNEY TO WORK LONG DISTANCES MASS TRANSIT MODAL SHARE MODAL SHARES MONTHLY INCOME MOTOR CYCLE MOTOR VEHICLE MOTOR VEHICLE EMISSIONS MOTORCYCLE MOTORCYCLES MOTORIZED TRANSPORT PASSENGER PASSENGER KILOMETERS PASSENGER REVENUES PASSENGER VOLUME PASSENGER VOLUMES PASSENGERS PASSENGERS DAILY PASSENGERS PER DAY PEAK HOURS PRICE ELASTICITIES PRIVATE VEHICLES PUBLIC TRANSIT PUBLIC TRANSPORT PUBLIC TRANSPORT AFFORDABILITY PUBLIC TRANSPORT SUBSIDIES PUBLIC TRANSPORT SYSTEM QUESTIONNAIRE RAIL RAIL BUS RAIL EXPENDITURES RAIL FARES RAIL LINES RAIL NETWORKS RAIL OPERATIONS RAIL RAIL RAIL RIDERS RAIL SERVICE RAIL SERVICES RAIL STATIONS RAIL SUBSIDIES RAIL SYSTEM RAIL TRAVEL RAILWAY RAILWAY LINE RAILWAY SECTOR RAILWAY STATIONS RAILWAY SYSTEM RAILWAYS RAPID GROWTH REGIONAL PLANNING RIDERSHIP ROLLING STOCK ROUTE ROUTES SCHOOL BUS SCHOOL TRIPS SOCIAL SERVICES STANDING PASSENGERS SUBURBAN RAIL SUBURBAN RAIL NETWORK SUBURBAN RAILWAYS SUBURBAN TRAINS SUBURBS TAXIS TOTAL COST TOTAL COSTS TOTAL TRIPS TRAINS TRANSIT SUBSIDIES TRANSIT SUBSIDY TRANSPORT AFFORDABILITY TRANSPORT MANAGEMENT TRANSPORT MODE TRANSPORT NETWORK TRANSPORT OPERATIONS TRANSPORT SECTOR TRANSPORTATION TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING TRAVEL BEHAVIOR TRAVEL MODE TRAVEL PATTERNS TRIP PURPOSE TRIPS TRIPS BY MODE URBAN TRANSPORT URBAN TRANSPORTATION VEHICLE WAGE WALKING WORK TRIPS This paper describes the role of public transport and the nature and incidence of transport subsidies in Mumbai, India. Mumbai has an extensive rail and bus network, and public transport is used for over 75 percent of all motorized trips in Greater Mumbai. Both rail and bus fares in Mumbai are subsidized: BEST, which operates public buses in Mumbai, is also an electric utility, and subsidizes bus fares from electricity revenues. We analyze the incidence of these subsidies, and their effect on mode choice, using data from a survey of households in Greater Mumbai. In Mumbai, as in many cities, the middle class is more likely to use public transport for travel than the poor. The poor, however, also use public transit, and their expenditure on public transit constitutes, on average, a larger share of their income than it does for the middle class. It is, therefore, the case that the poor benefit from transit subsidies in Mumbai, as well as the middle and upper-middle classes; however, the poorest 27 percent of the population receives only 19 percent of bus subsidies and 15.5 percent of rail subsidies. Indeed, 26 percent of the lowest income households surveyed do not use rail, while 10 percent do not use bus, implying that they receive no transit subsidies. Expenditure on transport accounts for 16 percent of income in the lowest income category (<5000 Rs./month), with 10 percent of income, on average, spent on bus and rail fares. This percentage, however, is not evenly distributed: it is much higher than 10 percent for households in which workers take the bus or train to work, and lower for households in which the main earner walks to work. Even in these households, however, 12.5 percent of income is spent on transportation. Expenditure on public transport would be even higher if bus fares in Mumbai were not subsidized. In 2005-2006, transport revenues of BEST fell below total costs by 30 percent and below operating costs by 20 percent. Rail fares, which are much lower than bus fares per km traveled, officially covered operating costs and almost covered depreciation expenses. 2012-06-08T15:22:45Z 2012-06-08T15:22:45Z 2007-11 http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2007/11/8683737/public-transport-subsidies-affordability-mumbai-india http://hdl.handle.net/10986/7522 English Policy Research Working Paper; No. 4395 CC BY 3.0 IGO http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo/ World Bank World Bank, Washington, DC Publications & Research :: Policy Research Working Paper Publications & Research South Asia India |