Uzbekistan : Public Expenditure Review
This Public Expenditure Review (PER) is Uzbekistan's first one, prepared as part of the Bank's effort to establish a multiyear program of public expenditure work with the Government. The PER seeks to demonstrate how to improve the quality of the ongoing fiscal adjustment, and increase the...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Public Expenditure Review |
Language: | English en_US |
Published: |
Washington, DC
2012
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2005/03/5711237/uzbekistan-public-expenditure-review http://hdl.handle.net/10986/8528 |
id |
okr-10986-8528 |
---|---|
recordtype |
oai_dc |
repository_type |
Digital Repository |
institution_category |
Foreign Institution |
institution |
Digital Repositories |
building |
World Bank Open Knowledge Repository |
collection |
World Bank |
language |
English en_US |
topic |
BANKS BASIC EDUCATION BASIC HEALTH BEDS BORROWING BUDGET EXECUTION BUDGET PROCESS CAPITATION COMMUNITIES/RURAL-URBAN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CROWDING OUT DEBT DEBT FINANCING DEBT SERVICE DECENTRALIZATION DEFICITS ECONOMIC FACTORS ECONOMIC GROWTH ECONOMICS EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE EMPIRICAL STUDIES EMPLOYMENT EXPENDITURES EXTERNALITIES EXTERNALITY EXTRABUDGETARY FUNDS FAMILIES FINANCIAL ACCOUNTABILITY FINANCIAL RESOURCES FISCAL DISCIPLINE FISCAL POLICIES FISCAL POLICY GOVERNMENT DEBT GOVERNMENT EXPENDITURES GOVERNMENT GUARANTEES GOVERNMENT SPENDING HEALTH CARE HEALTH CARE DELIVERY HEALTH CARE REFORM HEALTH FACILITIES HEALTH INDICATORS HEALTH NEEDS HEALTH SPENDING HEALTH STATUS HOSPITALS HUMAN CAPITAL INCOME INFECTIOUS DISEASES INTEREST RATES LABOR FORCE LEGAL FRAMEWORK LIVING STANDARDS LOCAL AUTHORITIES LOCAL GOVERNMENTS MACROECONOMIC STABILITY MARGINAL COST MARGINAL PRODUCTIVITY MEDIA MEDICAL SERVICES MORTALITY OUTPATIENT CARE OUTPATIENT SERVICES PATIENTS PHYSICAL CAPITAL POLICY DECISIONS PREVENTIVE HEALTH CARE PRIMARY CARE PRIMARY HEALTH CARE PRIVATE SECTOR PRIVATE SECTOR INVESTMENT PRODUCERS PUBLIC EXPENDITURE PUBLIC EXPENDITURE MANAGEMENT PUBLIC EXPENDITURE REVIEW PUBLIC EXPENDITURES PUBLIC FINANCE PUBLIC FINANCE MANAGEMENT PUBLIC GOODS PUBLIC HEALTH PUBLIC HEALTH EXPENDITURES PUBLIC INVESTMENT PUBLIC SECTOR PUBLIC SECTOR DEFICIT RESOURCE ALLOCATION RESOURCE USE SAVINGS SCHOOLS SOCIAL SUPPORT TAX TAX RATES TAXATION TRANSPARENCY TREASURY TUBERCULOSIS URBAN HEALTH URBAN HEALTH CARE UTILITIES |
spellingShingle |
BANKS BASIC EDUCATION BASIC HEALTH BEDS BORROWING BUDGET EXECUTION BUDGET PROCESS CAPITATION COMMUNITIES/RURAL-URBAN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CROWDING OUT DEBT DEBT FINANCING DEBT SERVICE DECENTRALIZATION DEFICITS ECONOMIC FACTORS ECONOMIC GROWTH ECONOMICS EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE EMPIRICAL STUDIES EMPLOYMENT EXPENDITURES EXTERNALITIES EXTERNALITY EXTRABUDGETARY FUNDS FAMILIES FINANCIAL ACCOUNTABILITY FINANCIAL RESOURCES FISCAL DISCIPLINE FISCAL POLICIES FISCAL POLICY GOVERNMENT DEBT GOVERNMENT EXPENDITURES GOVERNMENT GUARANTEES GOVERNMENT SPENDING HEALTH CARE HEALTH CARE DELIVERY HEALTH CARE REFORM HEALTH FACILITIES HEALTH INDICATORS HEALTH NEEDS HEALTH SPENDING HEALTH STATUS HOSPITALS HUMAN CAPITAL INCOME INFECTIOUS DISEASES INTEREST RATES LABOR FORCE LEGAL FRAMEWORK LIVING STANDARDS LOCAL AUTHORITIES LOCAL GOVERNMENTS MACROECONOMIC STABILITY MARGINAL COST MARGINAL PRODUCTIVITY MEDIA MEDICAL SERVICES MORTALITY OUTPATIENT CARE OUTPATIENT SERVICES PATIENTS PHYSICAL CAPITAL POLICY DECISIONS PREVENTIVE HEALTH CARE PRIMARY CARE PRIMARY HEALTH CARE PRIVATE SECTOR PRIVATE SECTOR INVESTMENT PRODUCERS PUBLIC EXPENDITURE PUBLIC EXPENDITURE MANAGEMENT PUBLIC EXPENDITURE REVIEW PUBLIC EXPENDITURES PUBLIC FINANCE PUBLIC FINANCE MANAGEMENT PUBLIC GOODS PUBLIC HEALTH PUBLIC HEALTH EXPENDITURES PUBLIC INVESTMENT PUBLIC SECTOR PUBLIC SECTOR DEFICIT RESOURCE ALLOCATION RESOURCE USE SAVINGS SCHOOLS SOCIAL SUPPORT TAX TAX RATES TAXATION TRANSPARENCY TREASURY TUBERCULOSIS URBAN HEALTH URBAN HEALTH CARE UTILITIES World Bank Uzbekistan : Public Expenditure Review |
geographic_facet |
Europe and Central Asia Asia Central Asia Commonwealth of Independent States Eastern Europe Uzbekistan |
relation |
Public expenditure review (PER); |
description |
This Public Expenditure Review (PER) is Uzbekistan's first one, prepared as part of the Bank's effort to establish a multiyear program of public expenditure work with the Government. The PER seeks to demonstrate how to improve the quality of the ongoing fiscal adjustment, and increase the efficiency of government expenditure, emphasizing the interconnections between sector policies and budgeting. At the request of the Government, the PER focuses on the health and education sectors, and, complements a Country Financial Accountability Assessment (CFAA), being prepared in parallel, focused on issues of internal control, and internal and external public expenditures audit. The reduction of expenditure, in the face of declining revenues, led to a remarkable, necessary improvement in the overall fiscal position. The broad public sector deficit has fallen to around 2 percent of GDP by 2003, from close to 10 percent in the late 1990s and, as a result, although high, debt levels have stabilized. However, the PER argues how sustainable are the deficit reductions. The brunt of reductions fell on non-salary recurrent expenditures, often vital materials and supplies, and on maintenance expenditures. As a result, there are funding shortages for primary health and basic education, as Chapters 2 and 3 show, and the government is unable to allocate sufficient expenditures on some of its stated priorities. An important reason for such outcome is the budgeting system, as Chapter 4 shows, which determines budget allocations based on input norms. Nevertheless, under-funding and inefficient expenditure allocation is also due to other factors discussed in Chapter 4. Ensuring that key services, such as basic health and education, are maintained and do reach the poor, will entail a rationalization of expenditures which, in turn, will require sectoral and associated budgeting reforms. Finally, the report addresses policy priorities and expenditure issues in the health and education sectors, and the necessary reforms in public expenditure management to implement the sector policies. |
format |
Economic & Sector Work :: Public Expenditure Review |
author |
World Bank |
author_facet |
World Bank |
author_sort |
World Bank |
title |
Uzbekistan : Public Expenditure Review |
title_short |
Uzbekistan : Public Expenditure Review |
title_full |
Uzbekistan : Public Expenditure Review |
title_fullStr |
Uzbekistan : Public Expenditure Review |
title_full_unstemmed |
Uzbekistan : Public Expenditure Review |
title_sort |
uzbekistan : public expenditure review |
publisher |
Washington, DC |
publishDate |
2012 |
url |
http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2005/03/5711237/uzbekistan-public-expenditure-review http://hdl.handle.net/10986/8528 |
_version_ |
1764404875909660672 |
spelling |
okr-10986-85282021-04-23T14:02:39Z Uzbekistan : Public Expenditure Review World Bank BANKS BASIC EDUCATION BASIC HEALTH BEDS BORROWING BUDGET EXECUTION BUDGET PROCESS CAPITATION COMMUNITIES/RURAL-URBAN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CROWDING OUT DEBT DEBT FINANCING DEBT SERVICE DECENTRALIZATION DEFICITS ECONOMIC FACTORS ECONOMIC GROWTH ECONOMICS EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE EMPIRICAL STUDIES EMPLOYMENT EXPENDITURES EXTERNALITIES EXTERNALITY EXTRABUDGETARY FUNDS FAMILIES FINANCIAL ACCOUNTABILITY FINANCIAL RESOURCES FISCAL DISCIPLINE FISCAL POLICIES FISCAL POLICY GOVERNMENT DEBT GOVERNMENT EXPENDITURES GOVERNMENT GUARANTEES GOVERNMENT SPENDING HEALTH CARE HEALTH CARE DELIVERY HEALTH CARE REFORM HEALTH FACILITIES HEALTH INDICATORS HEALTH NEEDS HEALTH SPENDING HEALTH STATUS HOSPITALS HUMAN CAPITAL INCOME INFECTIOUS DISEASES INTEREST RATES LABOR FORCE LEGAL FRAMEWORK LIVING STANDARDS LOCAL AUTHORITIES LOCAL GOVERNMENTS MACROECONOMIC STABILITY MARGINAL COST MARGINAL PRODUCTIVITY MEDIA MEDICAL SERVICES MORTALITY OUTPATIENT CARE OUTPATIENT SERVICES PATIENTS PHYSICAL CAPITAL POLICY DECISIONS PREVENTIVE HEALTH CARE PRIMARY CARE PRIMARY HEALTH CARE PRIVATE SECTOR PRIVATE SECTOR INVESTMENT PRODUCERS PUBLIC EXPENDITURE PUBLIC EXPENDITURE MANAGEMENT PUBLIC EXPENDITURE REVIEW PUBLIC EXPENDITURES PUBLIC FINANCE PUBLIC FINANCE MANAGEMENT PUBLIC GOODS PUBLIC HEALTH PUBLIC HEALTH EXPENDITURES PUBLIC INVESTMENT PUBLIC SECTOR PUBLIC SECTOR DEFICIT RESOURCE ALLOCATION RESOURCE USE SAVINGS SCHOOLS SOCIAL SUPPORT TAX TAX RATES TAXATION TRANSPARENCY TREASURY TUBERCULOSIS URBAN HEALTH URBAN HEALTH CARE UTILITIES This Public Expenditure Review (PER) is Uzbekistan's first one, prepared as part of the Bank's effort to establish a multiyear program of public expenditure work with the Government. The PER seeks to demonstrate how to improve the quality of the ongoing fiscal adjustment, and increase the efficiency of government expenditure, emphasizing the interconnections between sector policies and budgeting. At the request of the Government, the PER focuses on the health and education sectors, and, complements a Country Financial Accountability Assessment (CFAA), being prepared in parallel, focused on issues of internal control, and internal and external public expenditures audit. The reduction of expenditure, in the face of declining revenues, led to a remarkable, necessary improvement in the overall fiscal position. The broad public sector deficit has fallen to around 2 percent of GDP by 2003, from close to 10 percent in the late 1990s and, as a result, although high, debt levels have stabilized. However, the PER argues how sustainable are the deficit reductions. The brunt of reductions fell on non-salary recurrent expenditures, often vital materials and supplies, and on maintenance expenditures. As a result, there are funding shortages for primary health and basic education, as Chapters 2 and 3 show, and the government is unable to allocate sufficient expenditures on some of its stated priorities. An important reason for such outcome is the budgeting system, as Chapter 4 shows, which determines budget allocations based on input norms. Nevertheless, under-funding and inefficient expenditure allocation is also due to other factors discussed in Chapter 4. Ensuring that key services, such as basic health and education, are maintained and do reach the poor, will entail a rationalization of expenditures which, in turn, will require sectoral and associated budgeting reforms. Finally, the report addresses policy priorities and expenditure issues in the health and education sectors, and the necessary reforms in public expenditure management to implement the sector policies. 2012-06-20T15:49:56Z 2012-06-20T15:49:56Z 2005-03 http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2005/03/5711237/uzbekistan-public-expenditure-review http://hdl.handle.net/10986/8528 English en_US Public expenditure review (PER); CC BY 3.0 IGO http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo/ World Bank Washington, DC Economic & Sector Work :: Public Expenditure Review Economic & Sector Work Europe and Central Asia Asia Central Asia Commonwealth of Independent States Eastern Europe Uzbekistan |