Rethinking Resource Conflict

Reconsiders how natural resource abundance in minerals, oil and gas, water, and land is frequently associated with various negative development outcomes. Policy making has been affected by the theories on (1) economic performance of resource abundance; (2) political behavioral variables; and (3) civ...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: McNeish, John-Andrew
Language:English
Published: Washington, DC: World Bank 2012
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10986/9192
id okr-10986-9192
recordtype oai_dc
spelling okr-10986-91922021-04-23T14:02:44Z Rethinking Resource Conflict McNeish, John-Andrew World Development Report 2011 Reconsiders how natural resource abundance in minerals, oil and gas, water, and land is frequently associated with various negative development outcomes. Policy making has been affected by the theories on (1) economic performance of resource abundance; (2) political behavioral variables; and (3) civil war onset, duration, and intensity. Mechanisms that abate the resource curse include short-term confidence and peacebuilding, reconstruction of war economies, corporate social responsibility (CSR), medium-term legitimacy and state-building achieved through fiscal transparency and sharing of resource revenues, and regional anti-corruption strategies. The need for more qualitative social and historical analysis demands a new approach to the socio-economics of resource governance which builds on current scholarly trends toward reinstating grievance alongside greed as a factor defining natural resource conflict and suggests the further study of contrasting resource epistemologies as another layer in such friction. Including a larger spectrum of conflict reveals the importance of civil society, and with it of bargaining and confrontation to secure public agreements on natural resource management and the distribution of rents. 2012-06-26T15:40:33Z 2012-06-26T15:40:33Z 2011 http://hdl.handle.net/10986/9192 English CC BY 3.0 IGO http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo/ World Bank Washington, DC: World Bank Africa Latin America & Caribbean
repository_type Digital Repository
institution_category Foreign Institution
institution Digital Repositories
building World Bank Open Knowledge Repository
collection World Bank
language English
topic World Development Report 2011
spellingShingle World Development Report 2011
McNeish, John-Andrew
Rethinking Resource Conflict
geographic_facet Africa
Latin America & Caribbean
description Reconsiders how natural resource abundance in minerals, oil and gas, water, and land is frequently associated with various negative development outcomes. Policy making has been affected by the theories on (1) economic performance of resource abundance; (2) political behavioral variables; and (3) civil war onset, duration, and intensity. Mechanisms that abate the resource curse include short-term confidence and peacebuilding, reconstruction of war economies, corporate social responsibility (CSR), medium-term legitimacy and state-building achieved through fiscal transparency and sharing of resource revenues, and regional anti-corruption strategies. The need for more qualitative social and historical analysis demands a new approach to the socio-economics of resource governance which builds on current scholarly trends toward reinstating grievance alongside greed as a factor defining natural resource conflict and suggests the further study of contrasting resource epistemologies as another layer in such friction. Including a larger spectrum of conflict reveals the importance of civil society, and with it of bargaining and confrontation to secure public agreements on natural resource management and the distribution of rents.
author McNeish, John-Andrew
author_facet McNeish, John-Andrew
author_sort McNeish, John-Andrew
title Rethinking Resource Conflict
title_short Rethinking Resource Conflict
title_full Rethinking Resource Conflict
title_fullStr Rethinking Resource Conflict
title_full_unstemmed Rethinking Resource Conflict
title_sort rethinking resource conflict
publisher Washington, DC: World Bank
publishDate 2012
url http://hdl.handle.net/10986/9192
_version_ 1764408814459682816