Development and the Interaction of Enforcement Institutions

The authors examine how institutions that enforce contracts between two parties-producers and consumers-interact in a competitive market with one-sided asymmetric information and productivity shocks. They compare an informal enforcement mechanism, reputation, the efficacy of which is enhanced by con...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Dhillon, Amrita, Rigolini, Jamele
Format: Policy Research Working Paper
Language:English
en_US
Published: World Bank, Washington, DC 2012
Subjects:
Online Access:http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2006/12/7259034/development-interaction-enforcement-institutions
http://hdl.handle.net/10986/9280
id okr-10986-9280
recordtype oai_dc
spelling okr-10986-92802021-04-23T14:02:42Z Development and the Interaction of Enforcement Institutions Dhillon, Amrita Rigolini, Jamele ADVERSE SELECTION AGENTS AGRICULTURE APPLICATIONS ASYMMETRIC INFORMATION BUSINESS ASSOCIATIONS COMPARATIVE ADVANTAGE CONSUMERS DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS DISCOUNT RATE ECONOMETRICS ECONOMIC PERFORMANCE EQUILIBRIUM EQUILIBRIUM PRICES EXPECTED UTILITY EXPORTS FIXED COSTS FREE ENTRY FUTURE RESEARCH IMPERFECT INFORMATION MARGINAL COST MARGINAL COSTS MARKET FORCES MARKET SHARE MORAL HAZARD NASH EQUILIBRIUM POLITICAL ECONOMY PREMIUMS PRICE COMPETITION PRISONERS DILEMMA PRODUCT MARKETS PRODUCT QUALITY PRODUCTIVITY PROPERTY RIGHTS SAVINGS SPREAD SUB-SAHARAN AFRICA SUBSTITUTE SUNK COSTS The authors examine how institutions that enforce contracts between two parties-producers and consumers-interact in a competitive market with one-sided asymmetric information and productivity shocks. They compare an informal enforcement mechanism, reputation, the efficacy of which is enhanced by consumers investing in "connectedness," with a formal mechanism, legal enforcement, the effectiveness of which can be reduced by producers by means of bribes. When legal enforcement is poor, consumers connect more with one another to improve informal enforcement. In contrast, a well-connected network of consumers reduces producers' incentives to bribe. In equilibrium, the model predicts a positive relationship between the frequency of productivity shocks, bribing, and the use of informal enforcement, providing a physical explanation of why developing countries often fail to have efficient legal systems. Firm-level estimations confirm the partial equilibrium implications of the model. 2012-06-26T19:19:07Z 2012-06-26T19:19:07Z 2006-12 http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2006/12/7259034/development-interaction-enforcement-institutions http://hdl.handle.net/10986/9280 English en_US Policy Research Working Paper; No. 4090 CC BY 3.0 IGO http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo/ World Bank World Bank, Washington, DC Publications & Research :: Policy Research Working Paper Publications & Research
repository_type Digital Repository
institution_category Foreign Institution
institution Digital Repositories
building World Bank Open Knowledge Repository
collection World Bank
language English
en_US
topic ADVERSE SELECTION
AGENTS
AGRICULTURE
APPLICATIONS
ASYMMETRIC INFORMATION
BUSINESS ASSOCIATIONS
COMPARATIVE ADVANTAGE
CONSUMERS
DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS
DISCOUNT RATE
ECONOMETRICS
ECONOMIC PERFORMANCE
EQUILIBRIUM
EQUILIBRIUM PRICES
EXPECTED UTILITY
EXPORTS
FIXED COSTS
FREE ENTRY
FUTURE RESEARCH
IMPERFECT INFORMATION
MARGINAL COST
MARGINAL COSTS
MARKET FORCES
MARKET SHARE
MORAL HAZARD
NASH EQUILIBRIUM
POLITICAL ECONOMY
PREMIUMS
PRICE COMPETITION
PRISONERS DILEMMA
PRODUCT MARKETS
PRODUCT QUALITY
PRODUCTIVITY
PROPERTY RIGHTS
SAVINGS
SPREAD
SUB-SAHARAN AFRICA
SUBSTITUTE
SUNK COSTS
spellingShingle ADVERSE SELECTION
AGENTS
AGRICULTURE
APPLICATIONS
ASYMMETRIC INFORMATION
BUSINESS ASSOCIATIONS
COMPARATIVE ADVANTAGE
CONSUMERS
DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS
DISCOUNT RATE
ECONOMETRICS
ECONOMIC PERFORMANCE
EQUILIBRIUM
EQUILIBRIUM PRICES
EXPECTED UTILITY
EXPORTS
FIXED COSTS
FREE ENTRY
FUTURE RESEARCH
IMPERFECT INFORMATION
MARGINAL COST
MARGINAL COSTS
MARKET FORCES
MARKET SHARE
MORAL HAZARD
NASH EQUILIBRIUM
POLITICAL ECONOMY
PREMIUMS
PRICE COMPETITION
PRISONERS DILEMMA
PRODUCT MARKETS
PRODUCT QUALITY
PRODUCTIVITY
PROPERTY RIGHTS
SAVINGS
SPREAD
SUB-SAHARAN AFRICA
SUBSTITUTE
SUNK COSTS
Dhillon, Amrita
Rigolini, Jamele
Development and the Interaction of Enforcement Institutions
relation Policy Research Working Paper; No. 4090
description The authors examine how institutions that enforce contracts between two parties-producers and consumers-interact in a competitive market with one-sided asymmetric information and productivity shocks. They compare an informal enforcement mechanism, reputation, the efficacy of which is enhanced by consumers investing in "connectedness," with a formal mechanism, legal enforcement, the effectiveness of which can be reduced by producers by means of bribes. When legal enforcement is poor, consumers connect more with one another to improve informal enforcement. In contrast, a well-connected network of consumers reduces producers' incentives to bribe. In equilibrium, the model predicts a positive relationship between the frequency of productivity shocks, bribing, and the use of informal enforcement, providing a physical explanation of why developing countries often fail to have efficient legal systems. Firm-level estimations confirm the partial equilibrium implications of the model.
format Publications & Research :: Policy Research Working Paper
author Dhillon, Amrita
Rigolini, Jamele
author_facet Dhillon, Amrita
Rigolini, Jamele
author_sort Dhillon, Amrita
title Development and the Interaction of Enforcement Institutions
title_short Development and the Interaction of Enforcement Institutions
title_full Development and the Interaction of Enforcement Institutions
title_fullStr Development and the Interaction of Enforcement Institutions
title_full_unstemmed Development and the Interaction of Enforcement Institutions
title_sort development and the interaction of enforcement institutions
publisher World Bank, Washington, DC
publishDate 2012
url http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2006/12/7259034/development-interaction-enforcement-institutions
http://hdl.handle.net/10986/9280
_version_ 1764406806376873984