Mauritania : Urban Infrastructure and Pilot Decentralization Project
The project, implemented between 1996 and 2001 with World Bank funding of US$24 million had two components: (i) a program of poverty-oriented, labor-intensive works subprojects in participating cities, consisting of the rehabilitation or constructi...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Brief |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
World Bank, Washington, DC
2012
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2003/10/2810322/mauritania-urban-infrastructure-pilot-decentralization-project http://hdl.handle.net/10986/9717 |
| Summary: | The project, implemented between 1996
and 2001 with World Bank funding of US$24 million had two
components: (i) a program of poverty-oriented,
labor-intensive works subprojects in participating cities,
consisting of the rehabilitation or construction of urban
infrastructure and community facilities; and (ii) capacity
building ( pilot decentralization) at the municipal and
national levels. The project capitalized on the work and
experience gained by the country, the Region and the Bank
through the earlier "highly satisfactory"
Construction Capacity and Employment Project (CCEP). The
project created approximately 46,281 man-months of temporary
jobs- more than twice the projected number. There was a
delegation of 125 contract management conventions covering
149 infrastructure construction and/or rehabilitation
subprojects completed in 13 cities, which accounts for 85
percent of the urban population or 1.2 million inhabitants.
Nouakchott and Nouadhibou consumed 40 percent of the
investments, commensurate with their share of the urban
population (37 percent). Of the 149 subprojects, 144 were
fully executed (5 were under implementation in 2002)
targeting the most under-serviced neighborhoods. Two-thirds
of the subprojects were for educational and social
infrastructure and contributed to the reduction of crowding,
improvement of hygiene and security in schools, access to
primary health, and, to a lesser extent, access to
productive assets. Revenue-generating projects accounted for
about 18 percent of the total coat of $15.4 million-these
included the rehabilitation and/or construction of new
markets, slaughterhouses, livestock enclosures, and taxi stations. |
|---|