A legal study on inquiry procedure under the registration of Pharmacists Act 1951 and its regulations / Nurul Afifah Osman

In Malaysia, pharmacist’s misconduct cases are handled by Pharmacy Board Malaysia using existing inquiry process provides under the Registration of Pharmacists Act 1951 and its regulations. However, the implementation of the procedure has a limitation in certain aspects. Therefore, this research is...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Osman, Nurul Afifah
Format: Thesis
Language:English
Published: 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:http://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/21802/
http://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/21802/1/TM_NURUL%20AFIFAH%20OSMAN%20LW%2018_5.pdf
id uitm-21802
recordtype eprints
spelling uitm-218022018-10-09T02:40:54Z http://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/21802/ A legal study on inquiry procedure under the registration of Pharmacists Act 1951 and its regulations / Nurul Afifah Osman Osman, Nurul Afifah K Law in general. Comparative and uniform law. Jurisprudence In Malaysia, pharmacist’s misconduct cases are handled by Pharmacy Board Malaysia using existing inquiry process provides under the Registration of Pharmacists Act 1951 and its regulations. However, the implementation of the procedure has a limitation in certain aspects. Therefore, this research is to examine and compare the current laws on inquiry procedure for pharmacists between Malaysia and United Kingdom so as to highlight the inadequacies of the law in Malaysia. Subsequently, it is to recommend the methods in order to improve the current procedure. This research adopted qualitative research methodology where the information gathered from journals, reports, articles, books and a semi-structured interview. From this research, it was discovered that provisions in the Registration of Pharmacists Act 1951 are inadequate to assist the Pharmacy Board Malaysia in implementing the inquiry procedure for pharmacists. The obvious lacking is the absence of the definition of ‘infamous and disgraceful conduct’. Besides that, there are differences between Malaysia and United Kingdom in term of appointment of Board’s Members and no provision on notification to the complainant and interim order as compared with Pharmacy Order in the United Kingdom. Thus there is a need to improve on the administrative and legislative with regard to implementation of inquiry procedure in Malaysia. 2018 Thesis NonPeerReviewed text en http://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/21802/1/TM_NURUL%20AFIFAH%20OSMAN%20LW%2018_5.pdf Osman, Nurul Afifah (2018) A legal study on inquiry procedure under the registration of Pharmacists Act 1951 and its regulations / Nurul Afifah Osman. Masters thesis, Universiti Teknologi MARA.
repository_type Digital Repository
institution_category Local University
institution Universiti Teknologi MARA
building UiTM Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
language English
topic K Law in general. Comparative and uniform law. Jurisprudence
spellingShingle K Law in general. Comparative and uniform law. Jurisprudence
Osman, Nurul Afifah
A legal study on inquiry procedure under the registration of Pharmacists Act 1951 and its regulations / Nurul Afifah Osman
description In Malaysia, pharmacist’s misconduct cases are handled by Pharmacy Board Malaysia using existing inquiry process provides under the Registration of Pharmacists Act 1951 and its regulations. However, the implementation of the procedure has a limitation in certain aspects. Therefore, this research is to examine and compare the current laws on inquiry procedure for pharmacists between Malaysia and United Kingdom so as to highlight the inadequacies of the law in Malaysia. Subsequently, it is to recommend the methods in order to improve the current procedure. This research adopted qualitative research methodology where the information gathered from journals, reports, articles, books and a semi-structured interview. From this research, it was discovered that provisions in the Registration of Pharmacists Act 1951 are inadequate to assist the Pharmacy Board Malaysia in implementing the inquiry procedure for pharmacists. The obvious lacking is the absence of the definition of ‘infamous and disgraceful conduct’. Besides that, there are differences between Malaysia and United Kingdom in term of appointment of Board’s Members and no provision on notification to the complainant and interim order as compared with Pharmacy Order in the United Kingdom. Thus there is a need to improve on the administrative and legislative with regard to implementation of inquiry procedure in Malaysia.
format Thesis
author Osman, Nurul Afifah
author_facet Osman, Nurul Afifah
author_sort Osman, Nurul Afifah
title A legal study on inquiry procedure under the registration of Pharmacists Act 1951 and its regulations / Nurul Afifah Osman
title_short A legal study on inquiry procedure under the registration of Pharmacists Act 1951 and its regulations / Nurul Afifah Osman
title_full A legal study on inquiry procedure under the registration of Pharmacists Act 1951 and its regulations / Nurul Afifah Osman
title_fullStr A legal study on inquiry procedure under the registration of Pharmacists Act 1951 and its regulations / Nurul Afifah Osman
title_full_unstemmed A legal study on inquiry procedure under the registration of Pharmacists Act 1951 and its regulations / Nurul Afifah Osman
title_sort legal study on inquiry procedure under the registration of pharmacists act 1951 and its regulations / nurul afifah osman
publishDate 2018
url http://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/21802/
http://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/21802/1/TM_NURUL%20AFIFAH%20OSMAN%20LW%2018_5.pdf
first_indexed 2023-09-18T23:07:20Z
last_indexed 2023-09-18T23:07:20Z
_version_ 1777418570921148416