Protection of minority under the company law a comparative study / Ruziah Mohd

"It is not the business of the court to manage the affairs of the company. That is for the shareholders and directors. "It (the just and equitable provision) does, as equity always does, enable the court to subject the exercise of legal rights to equitable consideration; consideration, tha...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author:	Mohd, Ruziah
Format:	Student Project
Language:	English
Published:	Faculty of Law 1987
Subjects:	K Law in general. Comparative and uniform law. Jurisprudence KP Asia and Eurasia, Africa, Pacific Area, and Antarctica. Asia. (South Asia. Southeast Asia. East Asia)
Online Access:	http://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/27081/ http://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/27081/1/PPd_RUZIAH%20BINTI%20MOHD%20LW%2087_5.pdf

id	uitm-27081
recordtype	eprints
spelling	uitm-270812020-01-10T15:38:14Z http://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/27081/ Protection of minority under the company law a comparative study / Ruziah Mohd Mohd, Ruziah K Law in general. Comparative and uniform law. Jurisprudence KP Asia and Eurasia, Africa, Pacific Area, and Antarctica. Asia. (South Asia. Southeast Asia. East Asia) "It is not the business of the court to manage the affairs of the company. That is for the shareholders and directors. "It (the just and equitable provision) does, as equity always does, enable the court to subject the exercise of legal rights to equitable consideration; consideration, that is of a personal character between one individual and another, which may make it unjust or inequitable, to insist on legal rights, or to exercise them in a particular way. “Per Lord Wilber force in Ebrahimi v Westbourne Galleries Ltd. The above dicta expressed by the two of England foremost commercial judges represent judicial thinking on the rights of the minority shareholders, and demonstrate the progress made by such shareholders in securing greater protection over the years, culminating in the landmark decision of the House of Lords in Ebrahimi v Westbourne Galleries Ltd." It is axiomatic that a company acts in accordance with the decisions taken by the majority of its members, willing and able to vote yet, the minority cannot be completely ridden sough-shod. Hence, a proper balance of the rights of the majority and the minority is essential for the smooth functioning of the company. Faculty of Law 1987 Student Project NonPeerReviewed text en http://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/27081/1/PPd_RUZIAH%20BINTI%20MOHD%20LW%2087_5.pdf Mohd, Ruziah (1987) Protection of minority under the company law a comparative study / Ruziah Mohd. [Student Project] (Unpublished)
repository_type	Digital Repository
institution_category	Local University
institution	Universiti Teknologi MARA
building	UiTM Institutional Repository
collection	Online Access
language	English
topic	K Law in general. Comparative and uniform law. Jurisprudence KP Asia and Eurasia, Africa, Pacific Area, and Antarctica. Asia. (South Asia. Southeast Asia. East Asia)
spellingShingle	K Law in general. Comparative and uniform law. Jurisprudence KP Asia and Eurasia, Africa, Pacific Area, and Antarctica. Asia. (South Asia. Southeast Asia. East Asia) Mohd, Ruziah Protection of minority under the company law a comparative study / Ruziah Mohd
description	"It is not the business of the court to manage the affairs of the company. That is for the shareholders and directors. "It (the just and equitable provision) does, as equity always does, enable the court to subject the exercise of legal rights to equitable consideration; consideration, that is of a personal character between one individual and another, which may make it unjust or inequitable, to insist on legal rights, or to exercise them in a particular way. “Per Lord Wilber force in Ebrahimi v Westbourne Galleries Ltd. The above dicta expressed by the two of England foremost commercial judges represent judicial thinking on the rights of the minority shareholders, and demonstrate the progress made by such shareholders in securing greater protection over the years, culminating in the landmark decision of the House of Lords in Ebrahimi v Westbourne Galleries Ltd." It is axiomatic that a company acts in accordance with the decisions taken by the majority of its members, willing and able to vote yet, the minority cannot be completely ridden sough-shod. Hence, a proper balance of the rights of the majority and the minority is essential for the smooth functioning of the company.
format	Student Project
author	Mohd, Ruziah
author_facet	Mohd, Ruziah
author_sort	Mohd, Ruziah
title	Protection of minority under the company law a comparative study / Ruziah Mohd
title_short	Protection of minority under the company law a comparative study / Ruziah Mohd
title_full	Protection of minority under the company law a comparative study / Ruziah Mohd
title_fullStr	Protection of minority under the company law a comparative study / Ruziah Mohd
title_full_unstemmed	Protection of minority under the company law a comparative study / Ruziah Mohd
title_sort	protection of minority under the company law a comparative study / ruziah mohd
publisher	Faculty of Law
publishDate	1987
url	http://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/27081/ http://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/27081/1/PPd_RUZIAH%20BINTI%20MOHD%20LW%2087_5.pdf
first_indexed	2023-09-18T23:17:44Z
last_indexed	2023-09-18T23:17:44Z
_version_	1777419224725061632

Protection of minority under the company law a comparative study / Ruziah Mohd

Similar Items