Indefeasibility and equitable intervention in the Malaysian torrens system / Ahmad Nazri Ibrahim

In relation to its concept. effect of and exceptions to Indefeasibility of title in the Torrens system represents a very interesting area of study in Land Law. The very Central concept of Torrens system of registration is the Indefeasibility of title, the registered proprietor being given a sheild o...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author:	Ibrahim, Ahmad Nazri
Format:	Research Reports
Language:	English
Published:	Faculty of Law 1986
Subjects:	K Law in general. Comparative and uniform law. Jurisprudence KP Asia and Eurasia, Africa, Pacific Area, and Antarctica. Asia. (South Asia. Southeast Asia. East Asia)
Online Access:	http://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/27318/ http://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/27318/1/PPd_AHMAD%20NAZRI%20IBRAHIM%20LW%2086_5.pdf

id	uitm-27318
recordtype	eprints
spelling	uitm-273182020-01-16T05:52:34Z http://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/27318/ Indefeasibility and equitable intervention in the Malaysian torrens system / Ahmad Nazri Ibrahim Ibrahim, Ahmad Nazri K Law in general. Comparative and uniform law. Jurisprudence KP Asia and Eurasia, Africa, Pacific Area, and Antarctica. Asia. (South Asia. Southeast Asia. East Asia) In relation to its concept. effect of and exceptions to Indefeasibility of title in the Torrens system represents a very interesting area of study in Land Law. The very Central concept of Torrens system of registration is the Indefeasibility of title, the registered proprietor being given a sheild of protection against any adverse claim as against the title of the landed Property. Section 340 of the National Land code confers upon registration to a registered proprietor of land an Indefeasible title. However the fact remains that notwithstanding the concept of Indefeasibility as pointed out by Lord Wilberforce in FRAZER V NALKER (1967) 1 ALL.E.R. 649. Indefeasibility itself is never absolute. Not only does Section 340(2) of the Code provides for specific statutory exceptions to Indefeasibility of title but the court have also in nature of exceptions made equitable Incursions attacking the very basis of the Concept of Indefeasibility. The courts have stated that equity will step in to prevent the Machinery of the Act of Parliament being used to defeat equities. The Torrens System has not abrogated the principles of équity and its application but only so far as it is necessary to attain its own special objects it has altered the application of equity Faculty of Law 1986-05 Research Reports NonPeerReviewed text en http://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/27318/1/PPd_AHMAD%20NAZRI%20IBRAHIM%20LW%2086_5.pdf Ibrahim, Ahmad Nazri (1986) Indefeasibility and equitable intervention in the Malaysian torrens system / Ahmad Nazri Ibrahim. [Research Reports] (Unpublished)
repository_type	Digital Repository
institution_category	Local University
institution	Universiti Teknologi MARA
building	UiTM Institutional Repository
collection	Online Access
language	English
topic	K Law in general. Comparative and uniform law. Jurisprudence KP Asia and Eurasia, Africa, Pacific Area, and Antarctica. Asia. (South Asia. Southeast Asia. East Asia)
spellingShingle	K Law in general. Comparative and uniform law. Jurisprudence KP Asia and Eurasia, Africa, Pacific Area, and Antarctica. Asia. (South Asia. Southeast Asia. East Asia) Ibrahim, Ahmad Nazri Indefeasibility and equitable intervention in the Malaysian torrens system / Ahmad Nazri Ibrahim
description	In relation to its concept. effect of and exceptions to Indefeasibility of title in the Torrens system represents a very interesting area of study in Land Law. The very Central concept of Torrens system of registration is the Indefeasibility of title, the registered proprietor being given a sheild of protection against any adverse claim as against the title of the landed Property. Section 340 of the National Land code confers upon registration to a registered proprietor of land an Indefeasible title. However the fact remains that notwithstanding the concept of Indefeasibility as pointed out by Lord Wilberforce in FRAZER V NALKER (1967) 1 ALL.E.R. 649. Indefeasibility itself is never absolute. Not only does Section 340(2) of the Code provides for specific statutory exceptions to Indefeasibility of title but the court have also in nature of exceptions made equitable Incursions attacking the very basis of the Concept of Indefeasibility. The courts have stated that equity will step in to prevent the Machinery of the Act of Parliament being used to defeat equities. The Torrens System has not abrogated the principles of équity and its application but only so far as it is necessary to attain its own special objects it has altered the application of equity
format	Research Reports
author	Ibrahim, Ahmad Nazri
author_facet	Ibrahim, Ahmad Nazri
author_sort	Ibrahim, Ahmad Nazri
title	Indefeasibility and equitable intervention in the Malaysian torrens system / Ahmad Nazri Ibrahim
title_short	Indefeasibility and equitable intervention in the Malaysian torrens system / Ahmad Nazri Ibrahim
title_full	Indefeasibility and equitable intervention in the Malaysian torrens system / Ahmad Nazri Ibrahim
title_fullStr	Indefeasibility and equitable intervention in the Malaysian torrens system / Ahmad Nazri Ibrahim
title_full_unstemmed	Indefeasibility and equitable intervention in the Malaysian torrens system / Ahmad Nazri Ibrahim
title_sort	indefeasibility and equitable intervention in the malaysian torrens system / ahmad nazri ibrahim
publisher	Faculty of Law
publishDate	1986
url	http://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/27318/ http://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/27318/1/PPd_AHMAD%20NAZRI%20IBRAHIM%20LW%2086_5.pdf
first_indexed	2023-09-18T23:18:15Z
last_indexed	2023-09-18T23:18:15Z
_version_	1777419257667125248

Indefeasibility and equitable intervention in the Malaysian torrens system / Ahmad Nazri Ibrahim

Similar Items