The negligent nuisance / Ismail Brahim

In ‘The Wagon Mound’1 the Privy Council had to consider claims in public nuisance and negligence arising out of the original accident in Sydney Harbour. The decision in this case has given a fresh life to discussion of the relationship between Nuisance and Negligence. The judgement leaves obscure th...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Brahim, Ismail
Format: Student Project
Language:English
Published: Faculty of Law 1986
Subjects:
Online Access:http://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/27987/
http://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/27987/1/PPd_ISMAIL%20BRAHIM%20LW%2086_5.pdf
id uitm-27987
recordtype eprints
spelling uitm-279872020-01-30T08:37:53Z http://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/27987/ The negligent nuisance / Ismail Brahim Brahim, Ismail Negligence In ‘The Wagon Mound’1 the Privy Council had to consider claims in public nuisance and negligence arising out of the original accident in Sydney Harbour. The decision in this case has given a fresh life to discussion of the relationship between Nuisance and Negligence. The judgement leaves obscure the relationship between these torts. The Privy Council do not claim to have assimilated them, but in Goldman v Hargrave2 the court states las this Board has recently explained in the Wagon Mound (No.2) the tort of nuisance, uncertain in its boundary, may comprise a wide variety of situations, in some of which negligence plays no part, in others of which it is decisive. I n the Wagon Mound (No: 2) , ‘foreseeability’ , 'negligence' and fault are jostled together without any clear analysis of the relationship between these concepts or their proper roles in deciding actions in different torts. Faculty of Law 1986 Student Project NonPeerReviewed text en http://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/27987/1/PPd_ISMAIL%20BRAHIM%20LW%2086_5.pdf Brahim, Ismail (1986) The negligent nuisance / Ismail Brahim. [Student Project] (Unpublished)
repository_type Digital Repository
institution_category Local University
institution Universiti Teknologi MARA
building UiTM Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
language English
topic Negligence
spellingShingle Negligence
Brahim, Ismail
The negligent nuisance / Ismail Brahim
description In ‘The Wagon Mound’1 the Privy Council had to consider claims in public nuisance and negligence arising out of the original accident in Sydney Harbour. The decision in this case has given a fresh life to discussion of the relationship between Nuisance and Negligence. The judgement leaves obscure the relationship between these torts. The Privy Council do not claim to have assimilated them, but in Goldman v Hargrave2 the court states las this Board has recently explained in the Wagon Mound (No.2) the tort of nuisance, uncertain in its boundary, may comprise a wide variety of situations, in some of which negligence plays no part, in others of which it is decisive. I n the Wagon Mound (No: 2) , ‘foreseeability’ , 'negligence' and fault are jostled together without any clear analysis of the relationship between these concepts or their proper roles in deciding actions in different torts.
format Student Project
author Brahim, Ismail
author_facet Brahim, Ismail
author_sort Brahim, Ismail
title The negligent nuisance / Ismail Brahim
title_short The negligent nuisance / Ismail Brahim
title_full The negligent nuisance / Ismail Brahim
title_fullStr The negligent nuisance / Ismail Brahim
title_full_unstemmed The negligent nuisance / Ismail Brahim
title_sort negligent nuisance / ismail brahim
publisher Faculty of Law
publishDate 1986
url http://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/27987/
http://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/27987/1/PPd_ISMAIL%20BRAHIM%20LW%2086_5.pdf
first_indexed 2023-09-18T23:19:22Z
last_indexed 2023-09-18T23:19:22Z
_version_ 1777419327773868032