The comparative study of judicial activism in Malaysia and India / Mohamad Muhaimin Zakaria … [et al.]

This research was conducted to find out whether the practice of judicial activism is possible in Malaysia. The reason why this topic was chosen is due to the fact that each judgments made by judges are unique in its own way. From this research we are able to see that certain judges apply strict inte...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Zakaria, Mohamad Muhaimin, Nazeri, Abdul Khaliq, Abdullah, Muhamad Atif, Zuber, Mohamad Afiq
Format: Student Project
Language:English
Published: Faculty of Law 2013
Subjects:
Online Access:http://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/28335/
http://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/28335/1/28335.pdf
id uitm-28335
recordtype eprints
spelling uitm-283352020-02-13T08:44:31Z http://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/28335/ The comparative study of judicial activism in Malaysia and India / Mohamad Muhaimin Zakaria … [et al.] Zakaria, Mohamad Muhaimin Nazeri, Abdul Khaliq Abdullah, Muhamad Atif Zuber, Mohamad Afiq Foreign relations administration This research was conducted to find out whether the practice of judicial activism is possible in Malaysia. The reason why this topic was chosen is due to the fact that each judgments made by judges are unique in its own way. From this research we are able to see that certain judges apply strict interpretation of the law while some inserted a hint of creativity in making a decision. Besides that, we are able to identify the advantages of applying judicial activism and also the implications of improper practice and over practice of judicial activism. India was chosen as a benchmark for our research because of its practice of judicial activism that is a few decades more advanced than Malaysia and has more legal occurrences that can be compared with Malaysia. Besides that, from the resources that we have gathered, we have seen that the judges in India have actively participated injudicial activism to the extent that they also get involved in law making process. This research was conducted by way of perusing the decided cases and articles written by various academicians, lawyers and judges. Besides that, we also attained our sources by conducting interviews with the judges from the Court of Appeal and the High Court. From this research, we have managed to identify the benefits of judicial activism and its effects. Besides that, we have managed to create a simple guideline that can be referred in practicing judicial activism. Faculty of Law 2013 Student Project NonPeerReviewed text en http://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/28335/1/28335.pdf Zakaria, Mohamad Muhaimin and Nazeri, Abdul Khaliq and Abdullah, Muhamad Atif and Zuber, Mohamad Afiq (2013) The comparative study of judicial activism in Malaysia and India / Mohamad Muhaimin Zakaria … [et al.]. [Student Project] (Unpublished)
repository_type Digital Repository
institution_category Local University
institution Universiti Teknologi MARA
building UiTM Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
language English
topic Foreign relations administration
spellingShingle Foreign relations administration
Zakaria, Mohamad Muhaimin
Nazeri, Abdul Khaliq
Abdullah, Muhamad Atif
Zuber, Mohamad Afiq
The comparative study of judicial activism in Malaysia and India / Mohamad Muhaimin Zakaria … [et al.]
description This research was conducted to find out whether the practice of judicial activism is possible in Malaysia. The reason why this topic was chosen is due to the fact that each judgments made by judges are unique in its own way. From this research we are able to see that certain judges apply strict interpretation of the law while some inserted a hint of creativity in making a decision. Besides that, we are able to identify the advantages of applying judicial activism and also the implications of improper practice and over practice of judicial activism. India was chosen as a benchmark for our research because of its practice of judicial activism that is a few decades more advanced than Malaysia and has more legal occurrences that can be compared with Malaysia. Besides that, from the resources that we have gathered, we have seen that the judges in India have actively participated injudicial activism to the extent that they also get involved in law making process. This research was conducted by way of perusing the decided cases and articles written by various academicians, lawyers and judges. Besides that, we also attained our sources by conducting interviews with the judges from the Court of Appeal and the High Court. From this research, we have managed to identify the benefits of judicial activism and its effects. Besides that, we have managed to create a simple guideline that can be referred in practicing judicial activism.
format Student Project
author Zakaria, Mohamad Muhaimin
Nazeri, Abdul Khaliq
Abdullah, Muhamad Atif
Zuber, Mohamad Afiq
author_facet Zakaria, Mohamad Muhaimin
Nazeri, Abdul Khaliq
Abdullah, Muhamad Atif
Zuber, Mohamad Afiq
author_sort Zakaria, Mohamad Muhaimin
title The comparative study of judicial activism in Malaysia and India / Mohamad Muhaimin Zakaria … [et al.]
title_short The comparative study of judicial activism in Malaysia and India / Mohamad Muhaimin Zakaria … [et al.]
title_full The comparative study of judicial activism in Malaysia and India / Mohamad Muhaimin Zakaria … [et al.]
title_fullStr The comparative study of judicial activism in Malaysia and India / Mohamad Muhaimin Zakaria … [et al.]
title_full_unstemmed The comparative study of judicial activism in Malaysia and India / Mohamad Muhaimin Zakaria … [et al.]
title_sort comparative study of judicial activism in malaysia and india / mohamad muhaimin zakaria … [et al.]
publisher Faculty of Law
publishDate 2013
url http://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/28335/
http://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/28335/1/28335.pdf
first_indexed 2023-09-18T23:20:04Z
last_indexed 2023-09-18T23:20:04Z
_version_ 1777419371466981376