The third man: pseudo-objectivity and the voice of passivity / Thomas Hoy

One of the hallmarks of academic language is the use of the third person. Developed as an academic register primarily in the natural sciences, it is seen as having an air of objectivity. Consequently, it has been mandated in a range of disciplines where the values of objectivity and detachment are l...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Hoy, Thomas
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: ACRULeT, Faculty of Education & UiTM Press 2006
Online Access:http://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/301/
http://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/301/2/AJ_THOMAS%20HOY%20AJUE%2006.pdf
id uitm-301
recordtype eprints
spelling uitm-3012019-03-08T05:27:17Z http://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/301/ The third man: pseudo-objectivity and the voice of passivity / Thomas Hoy Hoy, Thomas One of the hallmarks of academic language is the use of the third person. Developed as an academic register primarily in the natural sciences, it is seen as having an air of objectivity. Consequently, it has been mandated in a range of disciplines where the values of objectivity and detachment are less clear-cut. Students are issued with blanket instructions such as, “Never write in the first person.” The problem is that sometimes the nature and content of the task is such that the only appropriate and honest voice to use is the first person. I describe a number of cases I have encountered in my work as an academic skills adviser where students have been asked to respond to tasks which call primarily on their personal observations, insights and experiences. In being told to record such accounts in the third person, students are being asked to surrender their position of personal authority. The effect is corrosive; students lose confidence in themselves and their ideas. Potentially rich writing becomes bland and corporatist. I suggest a number of strategies that could give students more autonomy in their use of academic language. The choice of voice should never be totally conventional. There are times when the third person should shut up and let someone else speak. ACRULeT, Faculty of Education & UiTM Press 2006-06 Article PeerReviewed text en http://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/301/2/AJ_THOMAS%20HOY%20AJUE%2006.pdf Hoy, Thomas (2006) The third man: pseudo-objectivity and the voice of passivity / Thomas Hoy. Asian Journal of University Education (AJUE), 2 (1). pp. 99-109. ISSN 1823-7797
repository_type Digital Repository
institution_category Local University
institution Universiti Teknologi MARA
building UiTM Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
language English
description One of the hallmarks of academic language is the use of the third person. Developed as an academic register primarily in the natural sciences, it is seen as having an air of objectivity. Consequently, it has been mandated in a range of disciplines where the values of objectivity and detachment are less clear-cut. Students are issued with blanket instructions such as, “Never write in the first person.” The problem is that sometimes the nature and content of the task is such that the only appropriate and honest voice to use is the first person. I describe a number of cases I have encountered in my work as an academic skills adviser where students have been asked to respond to tasks which call primarily on their personal observations, insights and experiences. In being told to record such accounts in the third person, students are being asked to surrender their position of personal authority. The effect is corrosive; students lose confidence in themselves and their ideas. Potentially rich writing becomes bland and corporatist. I suggest a number of strategies that could give students more autonomy in their use of academic language. The choice of voice should never be totally conventional. There are times when the third person should shut up and let someone else speak.
format Article
author Hoy, Thomas
spellingShingle Hoy, Thomas
The third man: pseudo-objectivity and the voice of passivity / Thomas Hoy
author_facet Hoy, Thomas
author_sort Hoy, Thomas
title The third man: pseudo-objectivity and the voice of passivity / Thomas Hoy
title_short The third man: pseudo-objectivity and the voice of passivity / Thomas Hoy
title_full The third man: pseudo-objectivity and the voice of passivity / Thomas Hoy
title_fullStr The third man: pseudo-objectivity and the voice of passivity / Thomas Hoy
title_full_unstemmed The third man: pseudo-objectivity and the voice of passivity / Thomas Hoy
title_sort third man: pseudo-objectivity and the voice of passivity / thomas hoy
publisher ACRULeT, Faculty of Education & UiTM Press
publishDate 2006
url http://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/301/
http://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/301/2/AJ_THOMAS%20HOY%20AJUE%2006.pdf
first_indexed 2023-09-18T22:44:24Z
last_indexed 2023-09-18T22:44:24Z
_version_ 1777417127970471936