Determination of body weight from footprint and foot outline breadth anthropometry among Melanau ethnics of Borneo island, east Malaysia for forensic investigation
The crime scene investigators use forensic footprint analysis to obtain vital information to solve crime. These include the estimation of stature, body weight, gender and age. Literature review shows that limited studies were conducted on body weight determination using foot impressions. This stud...
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Malaysian Society of Applied Biology
2016
|
| Online Access: | http://journalarticle.ukm.my/11826/ http://journalarticle.ukm.my/11826/ http://journalarticle.ukm.my/11826/1/45_02_21.pdf |
| Summary: | The crime scene investigators use forensic footprint analysis to obtain vital information to solve crime. These include the
estimation of stature, body weight, gender and age. Literature review shows that limited studies were conducted on body
weight determination using foot impressions. This study aims to develop body weight determination models for an indigenous
Melanau population residing in Borneo Island of east Malaysia from footprint and foot outline anthropometry. Footprint
study results showed that breadth measurements provided better result in body weight determination than length measurements.
Anthropometric measurements were made from a sample of 210 adults, with equal representation of 105 males and 105
females, following the standard procedure. Informed consent and ethical approval were obtained. The obtained data were
analysed with PASW 20 computer software and developed population specific model to determine living body weight from
footprint and foot outline breadth measurements. Correlation coefficient (R) values in footprint are found to be higher in the
pooled sample (0.592–0.602) when compared with males (0.509–0.527) and females (0.569–0.591) separately. Correlation
coefficient (R) values in foot outline are found to be higher in females (0.677-0.681) when compared with male (0.559-
0.641) and the pooled sample (0.642-0.665). |
|---|