Exploring teacher cognition in Malaysian ESL classrooms
The paper addresses the key question in teaching English language, that is, how does teacher cognition interact with classroom practice. The paper is part of a larger study which was conducted in sub-urban schools in Sarawak, East Malaysia via qualitative case study method involving teachers in ac...
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Penerbit Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia
2019
|
| Online Access: | http://journalarticle.ukm.my/14015/ http://journalarticle.ukm.my/14015/ http://journalarticle.ukm.my/14015/1/35892-115981-1-PB.pdf |
| Summary: | The paper addresses the key question in teaching English language, that is, how does teacher cognition interact with
classroom practice. The paper is part of a larger study which was conducted in sub-urban schools in Sarawak, East
Malaysia via qualitative case study method involving teachers in actual classroom practice. The teacher
participants were video-recorded in two separate teaching sessions to capture as far as possible authentic teacher
cognition practice. Each teacher was then asked to review his own recorded lessons and verbally report on his
actions in the class via stimulated recall protocol technique. The qualitative data generated were analysed for
specific features in relation to three main knowledge types representing teacher cognition namely, knowledge of
students, pedagogical content knowledge and general pedagogical knowledge. Several features were identified and
categorised according to the knowledge types. As far as Knowledge of students (KS) is concerned, it is important for
teachers to be aware of their students’ preferred learning styles as well as their proficiency levels. On Pedagogical
Content Knowledge (PCK), teachers should allow their students a lot of freedom in choosing the activities they
prefer. As regards General pedagogical knowledge (GPK), teachers need to be less dominating in the actual
classroom practice but instead acting more as facilitator to help guide and facilitate the students’ learning process.
For future research, it is recommended that longitudinal studies be conducted to further provide insights into
teacher cognition via generation of larger corpus of data on evidence of teacher cognition processes. |
|---|