Hedging in the discussion sections of English and Malay educational research articles
Academic writers resort to hedging as one of the interpersonal metadiscourse categories needed to present their findings cautiously in the hope that their research contribution can be accepted by the academic community. Such acceptance, to a great extent, depends on how propositions and claims ar...
Main Authors: | Chek, Kim Loi, Lim, Jason Miin-Hwa |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Penerbit Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia
2019
|
Online Access: | http://journalarticle.ukm.my/14045/ http://journalarticle.ukm.my/14045/ http://journalarticle.ukm.my/14045/1/27187-96210-3-PB.pdf |
Similar Items
-
Background information in the discussion sections of forestry journals: a case study
by: Renu Joseph,, et al.
Published: (2018) -
Use of interactional markers by Malay and native writers of English in the results and discussion section of English language studies research articles.
by: Norizan, Nur Nadhirah, et al.
Published: (2018) -
The use of hedges by Malay writers: a study on the discussion section of theses in English language and applied linguistics
by: Yasin, Nik Nadiah Amalina, et al.
Published: (2016) -
Interactional metadiscourse markers in academic research article result and discussion sections
by: Khedri, Mohsen, et al.
Published: (2013) -
Move analysis of pharmacy research article discussion sections / Laily Zainal
by: Zainal, Laily
Published: (2015)