Analysis on aspects of traditional (‘indigenous’) and western thinking in the classical and modern Burmese elites’ discourse concerning madness.

English translations of excerpts from a translated traditional medical text in Burmese on what it termed the ‘madness disease’ is provided and commented on. It is asserted that the text confuses between causes, symptoms, etiology and treatment of mental disorders. As to the nature of ‘the cause’ of...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Myint Zan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia 2010
Online Access:http://journalarticle.ukm.my/595/
http://journalarticle.ukm.my/595/
http://journalarticle.ukm.my/595/1/1.pdf
id ukm-595
recordtype eprints
spelling ukm-5952011-08-11T07:14:40Z http://journalarticle.ukm.my/595/ Analysis on aspects of traditional (‘indigenous’) and western thinking in the classical and modern Burmese elites’ discourse concerning madness. Myint Zan, English translations of excerpts from a translated traditional medical text in Burmese on what it termed the ‘madness disease’ is provided and commented on. It is asserted that the text confuses between causes, symptoms, etiology and treatment of mental disorders. As to the nature of ‘the cause’ of ‘madness disease’ the text gives the most emphasis on the supernatural, esoteric or ‘macabre’ causes of madness that is considered as an ‘affliction’ when the subject is ‘seized’ or possessed by the ‘nats’ roughly translated as evil ‘spirits’ or the agents of the evil spirits. The Burmese translation of this text which was published around the year 1963 directly contradicts the educative books on psychiatry written by a Burmese psychiatrist and a literary writer which was published in the same decade and which in effect ‘debunks’ the notion of madness being caused by the nats. In contrast to those discoursed in the traditional texts, the modern Burmese elites inclusive of psychiatrists, psychologists and literary writers adhere to and directly or indirectly espouse the tenets of the modern, Western concepts of mental illness. The theories of Michel Foucault and Thomas Szasz on mental illness can be considered as challenges to or strong dissents from the ‘main stream’ Western concepts of mental illness. The article concludes with an analysis of the possible causes of the lack of interest, discussion and discourse among even a handful of Burmese elites on the ‘dissident’ theories of Foucault and Szasz on the subject. Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia 2010-01 Article PeerReviewed application/pdf en http://journalarticle.ukm.my/595/1/1.pdf Myint Zan, (2010) Analysis on aspects of traditional (‘indigenous’) and western thinking in the classical and modern Burmese elites’ discourse concerning madness. AKADEMIKA, 78 . pp. 15-35. ISSN 0126-5008 http://www.ukm.my/~penerbit/akademika
repository_type Digital Repository
institution_category Local University
institution Universiti Kebangasaan Malaysia
building UKM Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
language English
description English translations of excerpts from a translated traditional medical text in Burmese on what it termed the ‘madness disease’ is provided and commented on. It is asserted that the text confuses between causes, symptoms, etiology and treatment of mental disorders. As to the nature of ‘the cause’ of ‘madness disease’ the text gives the most emphasis on the supernatural, esoteric or ‘macabre’ causes of madness that is considered as an ‘affliction’ when the subject is ‘seized’ or possessed by the ‘nats’ roughly translated as evil ‘spirits’ or the agents of the evil spirits. The Burmese translation of this text which was published around the year 1963 directly contradicts the educative books on psychiatry written by a Burmese psychiatrist and a literary writer which was published in the same decade and which in effect ‘debunks’ the notion of madness being caused by the nats. In contrast to those discoursed in the traditional texts, the modern Burmese elites inclusive of psychiatrists, psychologists and literary writers adhere to and directly or indirectly espouse the tenets of the modern, Western concepts of mental illness. The theories of Michel Foucault and Thomas Szasz on mental illness can be considered as challenges to or strong dissents from the ‘main stream’ Western concepts of mental illness. The article concludes with an analysis of the possible causes of the lack of interest, discussion and discourse among even a handful of Burmese elites on the ‘dissident’ theories of Foucault and Szasz on the subject.
format Article
author Myint Zan,
spellingShingle Myint Zan,
Analysis on aspects of traditional (‘indigenous’) and western thinking in the classical and modern Burmese elites’ discourse concerning madness.
author_facet Myint Zan,
author_sort Myint Zan,
title Analysis on aspects of traditional (‘indigenous’) and western thinking in the classical and modern Burmese elites’ discourse concerning madness.
title_short Analysis on aspects of traditional (‘indigenous’) and western thinking in the classical and modern Burmese elites’ discourse concerning madness.
title_full Analysis on aspects of traditional (‘indigenous’) and western thinking in the classical and modern Burmese elites’ discourse concerning madness.
title_fullStr Analysis on aspects of traditional (‘indigenous’) and western thinking in the classical and modern Burmese elites’ discourse concerning madness.
title_full_unstemmed Analysis on aspects of traditional (‘indigenous’) and western thinking in the classical and modern Burmese elites’ discourse concerning madness.
title_sort analysis on aspects of traditional (‘indigenous’) and western thinking in the classical and modern burmese elites’ discourse concerning madness.
publisher Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia
publishDate 2010
url http://journalarticle.ukm.my/595/
http://journalarticle.ukm.my/595/
http://journalarticle.ukm.my/595/1/1.pdf
first_indexed 2023-09-18T19:31:19Z
last_indexed 2023-09-18T19:31:19Z
_version_ 1777404980654768128