The failure of the United Nations in resolving the Palestine-Israel conflict: a neorealist perspective
The existence of non-state actors at the international level has always been viewed within the liberalist and constructivist perspectives. However, despite being a major international organization, the UN’s role and decisions are influenced by super-powers such as the United States (US). This arti...
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities, UKM,Bangi
2015
|
| Online Access: | http://journalarticle.ukm.my/8909/ http://journalarticle.ukm.my/8909/ http://journalarticle.ukm.my/8909/1/9x.geografia-feb15-kartini-edam1.pdf |
| Summary: | The existence of non-state actors at the international level has always been viewed within the liberalist and
constructivist perspectives. However, despite being a major international organization, the UN’s role and decisions
are influenced by super-powers such as the United States (US). This article examines the continuing significance of
the United Nations’ (UN) inability to resolve the conflict between Israel and Palestine from the neorealist
perspective. It delineates the weaknesses embedded in the UN and highlights the interventionist role played by the
US. The method adopted was mainly qualitative, using a process tracing approach of secondary data to address
events and key findings of the UN’s weaknesses and of the US’s intervention timeline. The findings revealed that
the US influence was significant in that it instigated continuous violence in the Palestine-Israel conflict. The “what
is” context in this study was further analyzed into a theoretical discussion the central argument of which was to
explicate the neorealist approach, including the concepts of international systems and hegemony. It examined the
state as the main actor in maximizing its capabilities to influence and dominate the international system. The role of
the UN is now in question but the significance of its existence remains relevant to the international system because
of state recognition besides humanitarian aids, development programmes and other member benefits. As this study
demonstrates the result is that the state continues to be the most important factor driving the international system. |
|---|