Evaluation of Virtual Desktop Infrastructure host using User Workload Simulator

Increasing cost and complexity of maintaining physical computers have caused large organization to consider alternative solution such as implementing Virtual Desktop Infrastructure (VDI) in their enterprise network. However, before deploying VDI solution in a large scale, it is essential to evaluate...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors:	Syahrul A. C., Abdullah, Muhammad F. M., Nazri, H. C. Soh, Zainal, Kamal Z., Zamli
Format:	Conference or Workshop Item
Language:	English English
Published:	2015
Subjects:	QA76 Computer software
Online Access:	http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/11861/ http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/11861/ http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/11861/1/Evaluation%20of%20Virtual%20Desktop%20Infrastructure%20host%20using%20User%20Workload%20Simulator.pdf http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/11861/7/Evaluation%20of%20Virtual%20Desktop%20Infrastructure%20host%20using%20User%20Workload%20Simulator-abstract.pdf

id	ump-11861
recordtype	eprints
spelling	ump-118612018-01-16T02:30:51Z http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/11861/ Evaluation of Virtual Desktop Infrastructure host using User Workload Simulator Syahrul A. C., Abdullah Muhammad F. M., Nazri H. C. Soh, Zainal Kamal Z., Zamli QA76 Computer software Increasing cost and complexity of maintaining physical computers have caused large organization to consider alternative solution such as implementing Virtual Desktop Infrastructure (VDI) in their enterprise network. However, before deploying VDI solution in a large scale, it is essential to evaluate the sufficiency of the solution first. As a result, User Workload Simulator was developed. The simulator was used to evaluate two VDI solutions that are named VDI A and VDI B. The objective of the evaluation is to compare which solution can be a better VDI server host. From the result, VDI A is sufficiently better than VDI B for VM density per host. But in terms of network bandwidth utilization and Input/Output Operations Per Second (IOPS) consumption per host, VDI B is sufficiently better as it utilized less network bandwidth and consumed less IOPS on most of the user profiles evaluated. 2015 Conference or Workshop Item PeerReviewed application/pdf en http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/11861/1/Evaluation%20of%20Virtual%20Desktop%20Infrastructure%20host%20using%20User%20Workload%20Simulator.pdf application/pdf en http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/11861/7/Evaluation%20of%20Virtual%20Desktop%20Infrastructure%20host%20using%20User%20Workload%20Simulator-abstract.pdf Syahrul A. C., Abdullah and Muhammad F. M., Nazri and H. C. Soh, Zainal and Kamal Z., Zamli (2015) Evaluation of Virtual Desktop Infrastructure host using User Workload Simulator. In: Conference on Open Systems, 24-26 August 2015 , Melaka. pp. 28-33.. http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpls/abs_all.jsp?arnumber=7377273&tag=1
repository_type	Digital Repository
institution_category	Local University
institution	Universiti Malaysia Pahang
building	UMP Institutional Repository
collection	Online Access
language	English English
topic	QA76 Computer software
spellingShingle	QA76 Computer software Syahrul A. C., Abdullah Muhammad F. M., Nazri H. C. Soh, Zainal Kamal Z., Zamli Evaluation of Virtual Desktop Infrastructure host using User Workload Simulator
description	Increasing cost and complexity of maintaining physical computers have caused large organization to consider alternative solution such as implementing Virtual Desktop Infrastructure (VDI) in their enterprise network. However, before deploying VDI solution in a large scale, it is essential to evaluate the sufficiency of the solution first. As a result, User Workload Simulator was developed. The simulator was used to evaluate two VDI solutions that are named VDI A and VDI B. The objective of the evaluation is to compare which solution can be a better VDI server host. From the result, VDI A is sufficiently better than VDI B for VM density per host. But in terms of network bandwidth utilization and Input/Output Operations Per Second (IOPS) consumption per host, VDI B is sufficiently better as it utilized less network bandwidth and consumed less IOPS on most of the user profiles evaluated.
format	Conference or Workshop Item
author	Syahrul A. C., Abdullah Muhammad F. M., Nazri H. C. Soh, Zainal Kamal Z., Zamli
author_facet	Syahrul A. C., Abdullah Muhammad F. M., Nazri H. C. Soh, Zainal Kamal Z., Zamli
author_sort	Syahrul A. C., Abdullah
title	Evaluation of Virtual Desktop Infrastructure host using User Workload Simulator
title_short	Evaluation of Virtual Desktop Infrastructure host using User Workload Simulator
title_full	Evaluation of Virtual Desktop Infrastructure host using User Workload Simulator
title_fullStr	Evaluation of Virtual Desktop Infrastructure host using User Workload Simulator
title_full_unstemmed	Evaluation of Virtual Desktop Infrastructure host using User Workload Simulator
title_sort	evaluation of virtual desktop infrastructure host using user workload simulator
publishDate	2015
url	http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/11861/ http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/11861/ http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/11861/1/Evaluation%20of%20Virtual%20Desktop%20Infrastructure%20host%20using%20User%20Workload%20Simulator.pdf http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/11861/7/Evaluation%20of%20Virtual%20Desktop%20Infrastructure%20host%20using%20User%20Workload%20Simulator-abstract.pdf
first_indexed	2023-09-18T22:12:52Z
last_indexed	2023-09-18T22:12:52Z
_version_	1777415144610988032

Evaluation of Virtual Desktop Infrastructure host using User Workload Simulator

Similar Items