Developing and validating lean manufacturing constructs: an SEM approach

1) Purpose – To provide valid and reliable constructs for lean manufacturing (LM) for assessing its implementation level in order to target areas of improvement. 2) Design/methodology/approach – Based on an extensive review on LM literature and content validity assessment from practitioners and ac...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors:	Nawanir, Gusman, Lim, Kong Teong, Siti Norezam, Othman, Adeleke, A. Q.
Format:	Article
Language:	English
Published:	Emerald 2018
Subjects:	HD28 Management. Industrial Management
Online Access:	http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/21668/ http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/21668/ http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/21668/ http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/21668/1/Nawanir%20et%20al.%2C%202018%2C%20Developing%20and%20validating%20LM%20constructs.pdf

id	ump-21668
recordtype	eprints
spelling	ump-216682018-09-27T08:24:43Z http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/21668/ Developing and validating lean manufacturing constructs: an SEM approach Nawanir, Gusman Lim, Kong Teong Siti Norezam, Othman Adeleke, A. Q. HD28 Management. Industrial Management 1) Purpose – To provide valid and reliable constructs for lean manufacturing (LM) for assessing its implementation level in order to target areas of improvement. 2) Design/methodology/approach – Based on an extensive review on LM literature and content validity assessment from practitioners and academicians, nine LM constructs were identified. Measurement items for each construct were developed to become a complete questionnaire. The questionnaire booklets were distributed to large and discrete manufacturing companies in Indonesia. Out of 1,000 survey questionnaires sent, 236 usable responses were returned giving response rate of 23.60%. Subsequently, an empirical assessment on the constructs was done by using structural equation modeling approach. 3) Findings – The study identified the valid and reliable LM constructs, consisting of nine LM constructs and 64 measurement items. The study found that all the constructs are complementary and mutually supportive with each other. Indeed, it suggests the holistic implementation of all the LM practices. 4) Research limitations/implications – Owing the time and resource constraint, this study only involved large and discrete process manufacturing industries in Indonesia. Hence, the generalization of the result is slightly limited. More studies in several different contexts are required. 5) Practical implications – This study provided a valuable tool for researchers for gaining deeper understanding regarding the LM and its implementation. For practitioners, it is useful to evaluate the degree of LM employment in their companies, to target area of improvement, as well as to take possible actions in attempting to enhance the organizational performance. More importantly, practitioners should adopt all the LM practices in a holistic manner. 6) Originality/value – This study represents the first attempt to develop LM constructs for evaluating the LM implementation in Indonesia. Emerald 2018 Article PeerReviewed pdf en http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/21668/1/Nawanir%20et%20al.%2C%202018%2C%20Developing%20and%20validating%20LM%20constructs.pdf Nawanir, Gusman and Lim, Kong Teong and Siti Norezam, Othman and Adeleke, A. Q. (2018) Developing and validating lean manufacturing constructs: an SEM approach. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 25 (5). pp. 1382-1405. ISSN 1463-5771 https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-02-2017-0029 10.1108/BIJ-02-2017-0029
repository_type	Digital Repository
institution_category	Local University
institution	Universiti Malaysia Pahang
building	UMP Institutional Repository
collection	Online Access
language	English
topic	HD28 Management. Industrial Management
spellingShingle	HD28 Management. Industrial Management Nawanir, Gusman Lim, Kong Teong Siti Norezam, Othman Adeleke, A. Q. Developing and validating lean manufacturing constructs: an SEM approach
description	1) Purpose – To provide valid and reliable constructs for lean manufacturing (LM) for assessing its implementation level in order to target areas of improvement. 2) Design/methodology/approach – Based on an extensive review on LM literature and content validity assessment from practitioners and academicians, nine LM constructs were identified. Measurement items for each construct were developed to become a complete questionnaire. The questionnaire booklets were distributed to large and discrete manufacturing companies in Indonesia. Out of 1,000 survey questionnaires sent, 236 usable responses were returned giving response rate of 23.60%. Subsequently, an empirical assessment on the constructs was done by using structural equation modeling approach. 3) Findings – The study identified the valid and reliable LM constructs, consisting of nine LM constructs and 64 measurement items. The study found that all the constructs are complementary and mutually supportive with each other. Indeed, it suggests the holistic implementation of all the LM practices. 4) Research limitations/implications – Owing the time and resource constraint, this study only involved large and discrete process manufacturing industries in Indonesia. Hence, the generalization of the result is slightly limited. More studies in several different contexts are required. 5) Practical implications – This study provided a valuable tool for researchers for gaining deeper understanding regarding the LM and its implementation. For practitioners, it is useful to evaluate the degree of LM employment in their companies, to target area of improvement, as well as to take possible actions in attempting to enhance the organizational performance. More importantly, practitioners should adopt all the LM practices in a holistic manner. 6) Originality/value – This study represents the first attempt to develop LM constructs for evaluating the LM implementation in Indonesia.
format	Article
author	Nawanir, Gusman Lim, Kong Teong Siti Norezam, Othman Adeleke, A. Q.
author_facet	Nawanir, Gusman Lim, Kong Teong Siti Norezam, Othman Adeleke, A. Q.
author_sort	Nawanir, Gusman
title	Developing and validating lean manufacturing constructs: an SEM approach
title_short	Developing and validating lean manufacturing constructs: an SEM approach
title_full	Developing and validating lean manufacturing constructs: an SEM approach
title_fullStr	Developing and validating lean manufacturing constructs: an SEM approach
title_full_unstemmed	Developing and validating lean manufacturing constructs: an SEM approach
title_sort	developing and validating lean manufacturing constructs: an sem approach
publisher	Emerald
publishDate	2018
url	http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/21668/ http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/21668/ http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/21668/ http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/21668/1/Nawanir%20et%20al.%2C%202018%2C%20Developing%20and%20validating%20LM%20constructs.pdf
first_indexed	2023-09-18T22:31:53Z
last_indexed	2023-09-18T22:31:53Z
_version_	1777416340377698304

Developing and validating lean manufacturing constructs: an SEM approach

Similar Items