Mass Fraction Burn Comparison of Compressed Natural Gas and Gasoline

Vehicle efficiency relates to pollutants and cost savings in third world countries. In term of subcompact cars, the vehicle characteristics are governed by the engine for alternative fuels. The main focus of this paper is to evaluate a sub compact car engine for its performance and burn rate of gaso...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors:	D., Ramasamy, K., Kadirgama, R. A., Bakar, Z. A., Zainal
Format:	Article
Language:	English
Published:	Trans Tech Publications, Switzerland 2014
Subjects:	TL Motor vehicles. Aeronautics. Astronautics
Online Access:	http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/8445/ http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/8445/ http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/8445/ http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/8445/1/fkm-2014-devarajan-mass_fraction_burn.pdf

id	ump-8445
recordtype	eprints
spelling	ump-84452018-01-31T00:02:24Z http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/8445/ Mass Fraction Burn Comparison of Compressed Natural Gas and Gasoline D., Ramasamy K., Kadirgama R. A., Bakar Z. A., Zainal TL Motor vehicles. Aeronautics. Astronautics Vehicle efficiency relates to pollutants and cost savings in third world countries. In term of subcompact cars, the vehicle characteristics are governed by the engine for alternative fuels. The main focus of this paper is to evaluate a sub compact car engine for its performance and burn rate of gasoline and Compressed Natural Gas (CNG). A bi-fuel sequential system was used to do this evaluation. Measurements of engine speed, torque and fuel were done on an eddy current dynamometer, while measurements or in-cylinder pressure, crank angle and spark were analyzed from results taken by data acquisition system. The emissions readings were also compared from an emission analyzer. The results were analyzed for burn rate based on the first law of thermodynamic. The comparison show a drop of 18.6% for the power, brake specific fuel consumption (BSFC) loss was 7% and efficiency loss was at 17.3% in average for all engine speed. Pressure analysis shows peak pressure dropped by 16%. Burn rate shows why CNG had a slower burning speed on the small engine. The engine speed of 4000 rpm at Maximum Brake Torque (MBT) produced the most nearest results to gasoline Trans Tech Publications, Switzerland 2014-08-12 Article PeerReviewed application/pdf en http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/8445/1/fkm-2014-devarajan-mass_fraction_burn.pdf D., Ramasamy and K., Kadirgama and R. A., Bakar and Z. A., Zainal (2014) Mass Fraction Burn Comparison of Compressed Natural Gas and Gasoline. Applied Mechanics and Materials, 660. pp. 442-446. ISSN 1662-7482 http://www.scientific.net/AMM.660.442 DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.660.442
repository_type	Digital Repository
institution_category	Local University
institution	Universiti Malaysia Pahang
building	UMP Institutional Repository
collection	Online Access
language	English
topic	TL Motor vehicles. Aeronautics. Astronautics
spellingShingle	TL Motor vehicles. Aeronautics. Astronautics D., Ramasamy K., Kadirgama R. A., Bakar Z. A., Zainal Mass Fraction Burn Comparison of Compressed Natural Gas and Gasoline
description	Vehicle efficiency relates to pollutants and cost savings in third world countries. In term of subcompact cars, the vehicle characteristics are governed by the engine for alternative fuels. The main focus of this paper is to evaluate a sub compact car engine for its performance and burn rate of gasoline and Compressed Natural Gas (CNG). A bi-fuel sequential system was used to do this evaluation. Measurements of engine speed, torque and fuel were done on an eddy current dynamometer, while measurements or in-cylinder pressure, crank angle and spark were analyzed from results taken by data acquisition system. The emissions readings were also compared from an emission analyzer. The results were analyzed for burn rate based on the first law of thermodynamic. The comparison show a drop of 18.6% for the power, brake specific fuel consumption (BSFC) loss was 7% and efficiency loss was at 17.3% in average for all engine speed. Pressure analysis shows peak pressure dropped by 16%. Burn rate shows why CNG had a slower burning speed on the small engine. The engine speed of 4000 rpm at Maximum Brake Torque (MBT) produced the most nearest results to gasoline
format	Article
author	D., Ramasamy K., Kadirgama R. A., Bakar Z. A., Zainal
author_facet	D., Ramasamy K., Kadirgama R. A., Bakar Z. A., Zainal
author_sort	D., Ramasamy
title	Mass Fraction Burn Comparison of Compressed Natural Gas and Gasoline
title_short	Mass Fraction Burn Comparison of Compressed Natural Gas and Gasoline
title_full	Mass Fraction Burn Comparison of Compressed Natural Gas and Gasoline
title_fullStr	Mass Fraction Burn Comparison of Compressed Natural Gas and Gasoline
title_full_unstemmed	Mass Fraction Burn Comparison of Compressed Natural Gas and Gasoline
title_sort	mass fraction burn comparison of compressed natural gas and gasoline
publisher	Trans Tech Publications, Switzerland
publishDate	2014
url	http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/8445/ http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/8445/ http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/8445/ http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/8445/1/fkm-2014-devarajan-mass_fraction_burn.pdf
first_indexed	2023-09-18T22:06:01Z
last_indexed	2023-09-18T22:06:01Z
_version_	1777414713366282240

Mass Fraction Burn Comparison of Compressed Natural Gas and Gasoline

Similar Items