Benchmarking Governance as a Tool for Promoting Change
Transparency and openness are fundamental elements of institutional development. Recent events in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) have highlighted the importance of openness and transparency in governance-government processes, decisions, an...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Working Paper |
Language: | English en_US |
Published: |
Washington, DC
2013
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2013/06/18257658/benchmarking-governance-tool-promoting-change http://hdl.handle.net/10986/16249 |
Summary: | Transparency and openness are
fundamental elements of institutional development. Recent
events in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) have
highlighted the importance of openness and transparency in
governance-government processes, decisions, and expenditures
that are visible to public scrutiny and voice for citizens
in decisions affecting their access to basic services and
economic opportunities. This applies to higher education
just as much as it does to social and financial
institutions, corporations, and public agencies.
Institutions that are governed fairly, openly, and honestly
improve the lives of individuals, enhance innovation, and
function more effectively than closed and secretive
organizations. Measuring governance and quality of service
delivery is central to improving education outcomes. This
report addresses how university governance has been assessed
and compared in 100 higher education institutions (HEIs) in
seven countries in MENA, using an instrument that takes into
account the underlying principles of transparency, openness,
accountability, and voice and participation of stakeholders
in decision making. The key role played by university
governance in the improvement of education quality has been
a focus of attention in MENA countries for the past three
years. HE ministers and policy makers expressed their
specific need to benchmark university governance at a
seminar held in December 2009 at the Center for
Mediterranean Integration (CMI) in Marseille. The results of
this exercise to benchmark university governance in 100
universities in seven countries in MENA and the implications
they have for policy changes at the national and
institutional levels are discussed in this report. |
---|