Benefits of the ECOWAS CET and EPA Will Outweigh Costs in Nigeria, but Competitiveness is the Real Issue
This note analyzes the benefits of ECOWAS Common External Tariff (CET) and Economic Partnership Agreement (EPA) will outweigh costs in Nigeria, but competitiveness is the real issue. After decade-long negotiations, the ECOWAS CET and EPA with the...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Policy Note |
Language: | English en_US |
Published: |
World Bank, Washington, DC
2015
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2015/01/23799363/benefits-ecowas-cet-epa-outweigh-costs-nigeria-competitiveness-real-issue http://hdl.handle.net/10986/21312 |
Summary: | This note analyzes the benefits of
ECOWAS Common External Tariff (CET) and Economic Partnership
Agreement (EPA) will outweigh costs in Nigeria, but
competitiveness is the real issue. After decade-long
negotiations, the ECOWAS CET and EPA with the EU recently
reached decisive milestones. These major reforms should have
significant impacts and offer new opportunities to West
Africa, but have so far failed to garner a broad consensus,
notably in Nigeria. The lack of objective and easily
accessible assessments of their likely effects appears to be
partly responsible for this situation. Two recent World Bank
studies use a simple methodology to assess the potential
impact of these reforms on Nigeria. Overall, full
implementation of the CET and EPA in Nigeria would result in
limited fiscal losses, marginal welfare gains for consumers
and higher profits for a majority of manufacturing firms
accounting for the majority of jobs in this sector. Almost
all firms experiencing negative effects exhibit
higher-than-average profitability before the reforms and
most would remain profitable after them. The predicted
magnitude of both the CET and EPA is small compared to gains
that could be achieved by tackling supply-side constraints
faced by Nigerian firms. Combining trade policy reforms with
an ambitious competitiveness agenda that addresses the most
binding constraints and promotes regional trade appears as
the best way to maximize the benefits and minimize the
potential cost of these reforms. |
---|